Ukrainian people. In order for the Holodomor to be considered a genocide by the international community, it is necessary for it to meet the standards set out in the Geneva Convention in 1946. In this paper, the criteria for the Geneva Convention are set out, followed by a summary of actions taken by Stalin in Ukraine prior to the Holodomor, the facts of the Holodomor, followed by the argument for genocide and its counterargument, ending with the conclusion that the Holodomor should be considered a genocide
Holodomor, Forced Famine Genocide is the deliberate and organized annihilation of a racial, ethnic, religious, or national group of people. The term “genocide” was not used until after 1944, when it was created by a Polish lawyer named Raphael Lemkin, who combined “geno”, meaning race or tribe, with “cide”, which means killing. The Holodomor refers to the famine of the Ukranian people from 1932 to 1933 under the rule of a Josef Stalin. Under his leadership, the Soviet Union persecuted the Ukrainian
to dominate the region. Instead Piłsudski’s victory highlighted the weakness of the Soveit state, increasing its desire to modernize. This radical desire can be seen in the witness accounts documenting the Holodomor in Ukraine, which saw the deaths of millions of Soviet Citizens. The Holodomor was the result of Stalin’s iron will and desire to modernize the Soviet Union as quickly as possible, regardless of costs. By starving the Ukrainian countryside, Stalin broke all peasant opposition to his regime
Jacob Hill British Literature Mrs. Fudge 9 April 2015 Holodomor: The Effects of the Past on the Present The past profoundly affects the future. When a people is oppressed in a manner intended to crush their spirit, one of two things can happen: either they will be crushed, as intended, or their resolve will be solidified. Despite occupations in the past, Ukraine has maintained a nationalistic spirit that has transcended many decades and dictators. Over eighty years ago Ukraine was nearly pushed
Plan of the investigation: This investigation analyses the successes and failures of collectivisation in the Soviet Union, specifically looking at the impact it had on the peasants of Russia and whether it aided in satisfying the Soviet Union’s economic needs. In order to assess the extent to which collectivisation was a success, this investigation examines and evaluates the first few years of collectivisation, assessing collectivisation’s impact on the economy of the Soviet Union and the people