preview

Summary Of The New Bathroom Policy At English High School

Decent Essays

The labeling of other people determines how people think about them. Austrian philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein’s idea of linguistic determinism illustrates that people tend to alienate others from themselves, and not relate to those that they do not want to simply by their descriptions of the other. As seen in the film, Maria, Full of Grace, the words used to describe the drug smugglers were sub-human, and therefore no one would think about the reason they needed to play into that role. Likewise, in the short poem, “The New Bathroom Policy at English High School,” the principal’s paranoia to what he cannot understand shows that he is fixated on the differences in language across culture, rather than the similarity. Theoretically this is put …show more content…

He hears his name mentioned in a conversation, and immediately becomes paranoid about what they are saying about him. Because he sees them as different, he assumes them to be wrong, and that they shouldn’t be speaking Spanish in the bathroom to each other. Thus, he decides to ban speaking Spanish in the bathroom. His extreme action is explained by his xenophobia, or the fear of what he sees as foreign. Simply because he frames Spanish as a different language and culture, he cannot focus on the similarities of the people, but sees it as different, and ultimately wrong. Just because he couldn’t understand it, he felt that removing it, those thoughts would also be removed. Not only was his policy impractical, but it also accomplished nothing. Those thoughts would still be thought, and of course the rule is so outrageous that it will be very hard to enforce. Yet, if he tried to empathize with the students, rather than seeing them as very different, he may have been able to reach a much more effective solution. The principal’s abuse of power was justified as him as seeing the children as the other, and as Wittgenstein thinks, …show more content…

By only highlighting the differences and ignoring the similarities, once again, a person will think that the other is morally wrong. His his theoretical prison plan, he would put all the prisoners in a ring, where all prisoners would be visible to all others at any time. By them feeling watched, the prisoners would ultimately want to fit in, and not rebel. However, if framed differently, the prisoners could easily join together, and the system would no longer work. Even thought there would be a guard watching them behind a tinted wall that they couldn’t see through, the real ones holding the power in that prison would be the other prisoners, whose mindsets were changed to see the other prisoners as different and wrong. The guards would simply be able to threaten what would happen, and everyone would fit right into place, trying to be as normal and similar to the norm as possible. By making them all feel paranoid about themselves, Foucault knew the prisoners would try to fit in. Likewise, the prisoners all know through experience that those seen as different are also seen as wrong, and quite apparently would try to avoid that accusation and effect of the

Get Access