utauga County DHR Child Support representative’s testimony revealed that the issue is that there was an overpayment and that the custodial parent (CP), Teresa Warren, received a letter that she had to pay back money that she received for child support. Ms. Warren’s testimony is that when she first received the child support money she was made to pay it back in a timely fashion. She stated she paid the money back immediately. The problem is that she has not been in-touch with DHR for a very long time. Then unexpectedly she gets a phone call telling her that she is receiving a check. Ms. Warren stated she thought the check was for money that she paid back previously. She stated she still does not know after all this time why she had to pay
On Thursday, 08/11/2016, at approximately 1638 hours, I, Deputy Stacy Stark #1815 was dispatched to speak to Sheila Haggard about a report involving financial exploitation of an elderly couple. Haggard was a case manager with Shawnee Alliance. I spoke to Haggard via telephone. Haggard explained she spoke to an assistant Jackson County States Attorney, Rebecca Blomer and was advised to call the police department to file a report.
In order for a trial to be brought, the police and prosecutors might be able to prove that the elements of the particular offence are present. In this criminal case both Actus reus, Mens rea as well causation was clearly shown through the behavior of Katherine Knight.
Mercy Otis Warren was born on September 14, 1728. She was born to Cape Cod family. She wrote American poets, but she is dramatist, historian, and the first American woman to write things primarily for the public but not herself. She married a merchant and farmer, has five children. She wrote ‘Observations on the New Constitution.’
Mary Warren’s behavior foreshadow about her testimony in court by giving Elizabeth a doll she made, “a popper,” which later leads to her arrest. They found a needle inside the doll, in the same spot Abigail was stabbed in. She seems to be manipulated by Abigail, due to the fact that she feared to have to testify against her in court. “She’ll kill me for sayin’ that! Abby’ll charge lechery on you, Mr. Proctor!” Mary kept saying over and over again that she cannot, which also indicates that she knows that Abigail will do something terrible to her.
Mary Warren chose to start telling the truth because someone she cared about about was going to die. Mary Warren says in response to Danforth’s question, “...you sat in my court, callously lying, when you knew that people would hang by your evidence?”, “I did, sir.” (Miller 45) Mary Warren has chosen to start being truthful. In response to Danforth’s question, she replied that she had been lying, knowing that people would die. Mary Warren says, “I never saw no spirits.” (Miller 47) Mary has become completely truthful. She has changed from killing people for fun to telling the truth. This evidence concludes that Mary Warren has turned from lying for the sake of others.
The case of Nancy Troy and her family is undoubtedly complex and will necessitate a clinician with the ability to evaluate and address multiple dimensions of Nancy Troy and her family 's lives. It will be critical for a social worker to assess the family structure, the impact of violence, trauma, mental illness, and substance abuse, and finally, cultural considerations in order to address all the needs and areas of improvement presented by the Troy family.
The author, Phyllis A. Roth, is not your ordinary feminist, because she is also a Freudian. A better term to describe Roth would be a psychoanalytic feminist. One of her works as an author can be found in the back of the book Dracula: A Norton Critical Edition. Her criticism article is titled Suddenly Sexual Woman in Bram Stoker’s Dracula. In her article she analyzes the famous novel Dracula. She explores how gender plays a role in the novel and the concept of femininity. She writes about the transformation that takes place when a proper lady turns into a sexual vampire. Her article points out where hostility toward women 's sexuality is displayed in the novel, that the average reader may not pick up on. Roth has a strong argument. Let us examine Roth’s case.
Patricia Williams testimony demonstrates the negative impact the color blind ideology can have on others, in this case her son. The “color makes no difference” statement that the teachers were declaring formed a resistance in her son when identifying colors. This ideology shapes how people understand different races consequently letting racial matters be ignored and avoided. This ideology is indeed problematic is it impacts the way people respond to situations and events. Race must be taken into account in order to address issues of race. Without it, there will be a misunderstanding of, racial hostility, discrimination and other issues. Without it, they will continue to go consciously unnoticed and unsolved.
Russell County DHR representative’s testimony revealed that on July 14, 2003, the case with the CP, Juanita James, and the NCP was established. The NCP was ordered to pay child support of $190.10 per month. At the time the case opened, the parties were married, and the NCP was ordered to pay the amount of child support as stated in the divorce decree. The court incorporated and adopted the child support order into the divorce decree order. The NPC was already paying child support on those cases. In 2007, the CP applied for services, the case opened and was referred to the District Attorney’s office. Once the case was referred, the arrears were set on the case at the time of enforcement. The CP stated there were no direct payments received. All payments that were received through the payment center were calculated and received along with entering the Affidavit of No Direct Payments. The representative stated based on those facts, the interest was calculated on the child support amount in the order. The NCP was ordered to pay $190.10 per month beginning June 20, 2003 and an additional $25.00 per month toward retro support; the current arrears owed are $24,635.30. In April
For the public, a shocking judgement has arised from the Supreme Court of Canada on Hart’s trial—a man accused of drowning his three-year-old twin daughters. The Court ruled that videotaped confessions were inadmissible and the murder charges against Nelson Hart would be withdrawn due to insufficient evidence. For such a heartbreaking loss, the conclusion of this case seems confusing at best. However, with examination into the tactics used by undercover officers in an attempt to secure Hart’s confession, the Court uncovers injustice and emotional manipulation which disputes the legitimacy of the operation.
Mary Anne Warren’s argument on the legal status of abortion stands on a concrete understanding and realization of an individual’s personhood. Now Mary Anne Warren’s unyielding argument on the basis of personhood is that, “If we assume that an entity is a person just because it happens to belong to our favored biological classification, we stand convicted of speciesism, close cousin to racism. There are properties that do qualify an entity as a person, but simply being human is not one of them” (124). To first be able to argue why the abortion of a fetus is permissible she needs to give a clear distinction of what can be established a decisive factor of personhood. To distinguish a line between a fetus and a human and if abortion is to be morally permissible there needs to be an understanding of when this cut off between the two officially happens. In an example of the potential personhood and a right to life Mary Ann Warren uses a hypothetical scenario of a space explorer who lands on an unknown plant. While on this plant he encounters a race of aliens. Now since he is on another plant in the presence of these alien beings how should he act towards these beings. He must first determine if they have the capability of morality or if it is acceptable to consume these aliens for food. To determine if these aliens are in fact part of a moral personhood maybe he can notice works of art, forms of tools, and communication. However, even without evidence of these things they could
Mary Anne Warren argues in the position that abortion is morally permissible because the fetus is not a person therefore has no rights and not considered immoral to be killed. I shall argue that Warren’s argument in invalid since the claims of argument cannot be proven.
The second issue appears to be lack of person-group (PG) fit. PG fit is where employees and co-workers generally get along and has similar attributes such as education, values and supporting one another. Hence, this is not the case of PG being visible between Benton and Scoville. From the case this information has been gathered:
MAKEDA Silvera 's chapter 22 testimony is concerning her life as a lesbian woman in her home country, the Caribbean. She touches on certain aspects in her life like hearing gossip from her grandmother or mother about the local women in her community who were rumored to be lesbians and how they were punished for being so within that community. Her Caribbean community was deeply religious which brought out a homophobic energy amongst the locals. This energy is pronounced when Silvera describes that homosexuals were referred to as "sodomite" or "man royals", these terms called "dread words". Silvera goes into more detail about her communities ingrained Christian beliefs and how these beliefs began in slave days. When the majority of the world was subjected to Christian beliefs, missionaries particularly placed these beliefs among the Caribbean slaves. Salvera says that the bible was important for their forefathers because of its stories of strength and endurance but with that encouragement came negative connotations. These strong beliefs in the bible brought strong vibes of misogyny, racism and homophobia throughout the community hence the use of words like "Sodamite" to describe a lesbian. The word "Sodamite" originates from the old testament, this meaning lesbian or strong woman in her community and this revealing her communities very low opinions on homosexuals. Homophobia did not escape Silvera 's own family as she talks about her grandmothers reaction to her coming out
Civil law is predicated upon the original Roman Law code wherein the person was presumed guilty until proven innocent. Countries such as Italy practice this code of law and the most recent case that symbolizes this type of law is the Amanda Knox case. Knox was interrogated for over 24 hours without a lawyer and presumed guilty until proven innocent, which runs contrary to the common law practiced in America. This is why the case caused outrage in America, which didn't understand the civil law practiced in Italy and how a suspect can be deemed guilty until proven innocent, which dictates that the defendant can be incarcerated until the person goes to trial.