Table of contents
-Introduction
-Theories of his works
- Case Study
-Praises and Criticisms of Laswell’s Work
- Other areas where Harold Laswell was also known
-Reference
HAROLD DWIGHT LASWELL
He ls an American political scientist and a Communications Theorist who was popular for his extensive research in the areas of Politics. He was also a leader in the applications of Psychology principles to Politics and also in designing a structure of Politics which is based on theories of Natural Sciences.
He was born and raised in Donnellson, Illinois, to a Presbyterian clergyman father and a school teacher mother.
As a result of his good school results, he was given a grant to study sociology at the University of Chicago and graduated in 1922.He received a PhD from the same institution at the age of 24 in 1926. His final thesis which was on Propaganda Technique in the World War written in 1927 is in the forefront in the studies and research of Communication Theories.
Harold Laswell later attended the universities of London, Geneva, Paris and Berlin – and he focused on Sigmund Freud ideas which was instrumental to his psychological approach in Political Science.
He was one of the most creative and deep thinking political scientist during his era, who had a Multidisciplinary Academic background and yet did not major in any specific areas or disciple but choose to celebrate the Multi-Dimensional Nature of his works.
One area in which he focused on, is the
Most knew him as a leader. At the center of a revolution he made his mark. The start of a change began slowly. Those around the world learned of the controversy. His accomplishment led to the presidency of a certain college.
As an idealist philosopher, he valued the power of the mind and the imagination of physical reality (Claypool 3). In the summer of 1924 he spent time at Gurdjieffs schools. He became a disciple and led Gurdjieff groups in New
In addition to the difference of purpose between arts and sciences, which we have discussed above, a further distinction is offered by Lasswell (1958) that may be considered by some as somewhat biased: “The science of politics states conditions; the philosophy of politics justifies preferences.” He distinguishes between “the science of politics” and “the philosophy of politics” on the same grounds as the fact-value dichotomy of logical positivism. He appears to be implying that political philosophy (which, for the purpose of this essay, would fall under the jurisdiction of art) “justifies preferences” in the sense that it provides rationalizations for the personal preferences of the theorist of political philosophy (Horwitz, 1962). Science, on the other hand, uses only facts and empirical data as its tools of analysis. This overt process of analysis minimizes the scope for bias by the researcher (Pierce, 2008). Moreover it promises an impartial and reliable means of distinguishing ‘truth’ from ‘falsehood’ and gives us access to objective knowledge about the political world (Heywood, 2002). However the fact/value dichotomy is not as clearly defined as is assumed here. Values are deeply involved in the identification of facts as well as their description and examination since all political scientists enter research with at least some presumptions about their
John Mearsheimer is an American professor of politology of the University of Chicago, was born on the 14th of December of 1947. John Mearsheimer is well-known among scholars as the author of a theory of offensive realism and his book “The Tragedy of Great Powers Politics”.
James W Hewitt is the author of this book. He is president of the Friends of the Center for Great Plains Studies. This story was published in 2015 by the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska. James W Hewitt returns to McCook, Nebraska to see the scene of the crime that scared the small town of McCook.
He was one of those uncommon geniuses who sprung up occasionally produced revolutions and overturned the established order of things.
He was the leader of the Joint Committee on Reconstruction. This caused him to be a mysterious figure in history.
Psychologist, born in Susquhanna, Pa. He studied at Harvard, teaching there (1931-6, 1947-74). A leading behaviorist, he is a proponent of operant conditioning, and the inventor of the Skinner box for facilitating experimental observations.
strong supporter of the american system and a war hawk. known as the “great compromiser” outlined the compromise of 1850
Each of these aspects would influence his unsentimental outlook of the social, political, and governance issues that he would later inform people of in his most famous works (28). This viewpoint of his can clearly be seen in all his works.
he was a unique person who affected many people’s lives. Some would identify him as a rebel,
mostly well known for his stand against segregation in the past time. During the age of “white
Throughout his public life, he embodied for many people an ideal of persistence, tolerance and personal strength. In my opinion, it is the combination of these qualities that made him an outstanding person and a globally recognized leader. Neither persistence without strength, nor strength without tolerance would suffice to turn around the life of
B.F. Skinner was one of the most influential theorists in modern psychology. His work was very important and has been studied by many for years. Skinner was a very straightforward man and a very educated man. His theories have helped mankind in many ways. He has studied the behavior patterns of many living organisms. Skinner was a well-published writer. His work has been published in many journals. He also has written many books on behaviorism. His most important work was the study of behaviorism.
John Dewey transformed the United States educational system as a philosopher, reformer and psychologist. He published thousands of writings on art, social theory, logic, and ethics, but is best known for his promotion of pragmatism and democracy. His work in the birth of functional psychology made him one of the most cited and influential psychologists in the 20th century.