preview

Deborah L. Rhodes The Beauty Bias

Decent Essays

As I was reading The Beauty Bias, by Deborah L. Rhodes, I came across a statistic that perplexed me, saying the total “annual global investment in grooming” comes to $115 billion (Rhodes, pg. 32). This shocking fact provokes a worrisome question: Why do we, humans, spend so much time, money, and thought on our appearance? As a complex question, there are several equally complex answers. However, the simple answer is that everyone else invests their time and thought into your outer shell, eliciting effort from you to improve what they study - your external image. The concern placed on one’s fashion choice or natural features by society takes away from larger, more pressing issues such as the declining economy, or feeding third-world countries. …show more content…

In the race for the presidency between Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy, many would say that the debate was the most influential factor. Specifically the decision of makeup or no makeup that the two candidates had to make. Before the debate, Nixon had just recently recovered from a broken knee and was exhausted from the long day, but then refused makeup when it was offered to him. Kennedy, on the other hand, had spent the day relaxing and rehearsing, and accepted makeup, looking fully rejuvenated (Morton). TV viewers of the debate said JFK won, while the radio audience claimed it was a draw. Those who could see the competitors were more focused on the contrast in their appearances than their responses to important global issues. If we deem our leaders responsible based on their face rather than their eligibility, we’ll lead ourselves down a destructive path of failure. Also, on the labor side of things, Deborah Rhodes mentioned in her book that short men have a disadvantage in earnings, hiring, and career advancement (Rhodes, pg. 93). Employers are constantly dismissing individuals because they don’t meet some aesthetic quota, even when it doesn’t apply to the type of work for which they’re applying. They evaluate their interviewees using irrelevant information, while possibly affecting the company’s …show more content…

In the article “Books and Covers”, by Jay Nordlinger, he points out that while many thought that Richard Armitage, deputy secretary of state, was a republican, he often sided more democratic and made decisions represented by the liberal party (Nordlinger). This happens quite often, where people decide what political party someone’s in just by examining their looks, or “cover”. That’s like reading the table of contents in a book, then writing a book report over it. These individuals are often wrong, for the simple reason that you can’t judge a book, or person, by the cover. Since humans don’t have psychic abilities, putting someone in a category because of their apparel or physique is fallacious. Also in Nordlinger’s article, he exhibited an old ad for Obamacare, displaying a man in his pajamas, drinking hot cocoa. Many said the model looked metrosexual, but he was in fact heterosexual (Nordlinger). When people assume that someone’s in a group because of how they look, it’s often not only false, but also frequently hurtful. Oscar Wilde’s adage about the word “assume” keeps proving itself to be true. The cost of being hasty to generalize or judge is far greater than presumed and it’s just not worth it. Placing people into columns or political parties

Get Access