The Beginnings Of Intellectual Property Rights

Protection of intellectual property are investments based on acquired knowledge, thought and effort by one or multiple individuals on behalf of themselves, the business they work for when the property is created, and a financial investment. Each of these – acquired knowledge, thought, physical effort, financial investment – have a value that can be attached as it relates the usefulness or importance of the resulting product. That value will have a level of importance to the individual(s) creating the product and if applicable, the investor providing the funds in support of the creation.

Challenges that Serling faced from advertisers and censors included the critics not wanting watcher/listeners to be offended by his scripts.His works were “whittled down to avoid controversy” (5) by the censors. Serling wrote controversial scripts that were considered too “taboo” for audiences. The advertisers wanted to tone down his writing in order to make it more appealing to audiences. Rod Serling chose to write science fiction and create his own T.V.show in order to write freely, without the demands of advertisers and censors.Serling was “intent on making sure his stories made their wayto the screen without sacrificing their central message, no matter how controversial they might have been, so Serling decided to simply create his own

An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property Author(s): Stanley M. Besen and Leo J. Raskind Reviewed work(s): Source: The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Winter, 1991), pp. 3-27 Published by: American Economic Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1942699 . Accessed: 24/11/2011 08:39

Jain, S. C., & Bird, R. (2008). The Global Challenge of Intellectual Property Rights. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

An effective system of intellectual property is important in facilitating innovation as well as economic growth within a country and across all its borders (Davidson, Monoti, Wiseman, 2012). The current global economy is concentrating more in the invention of ideas that are original, other than in manufacturing of machines. To enhance and protect these ideas, there ought to be effective intellectual property laws. The government of Australia has prioritized the protection of original ideas from individuals through copyright, patent, and trademarks among other intelligent property laws, which give the inventor a temporary period to enjoy the financial benefits of his or her original idea. The major purposes of intellectual property laws can be contested; therefore, they create areas of interest for

Intellectual property is described as a person’s ideas, inventions, or works that become their property. The owner of this property then has rights to the property. These rights protect the products of human intelligence and creativity. These rights have been categorized into three subjects: patents, trademarks, and copyrights. Each of these three categories have their own set of laws and policies. Each policy is set into place for specific reasons to protect the owner’s and their intellectual property from being subjected to intellectual property theft. IP theft is a growing industry of thieves that is becoming a much easier task since the invention of the internet.

Paragraph 5 of the Preamble of the TRIPS Agreement provides that “the underlying public policy objectives of national systems for the protection of intellectual property, including developmental and technological objectives” Accordingly, the Preamble is not an operative provision. Therefore, Professor Grosse Ruse-khan suggests that the position of the Preamble “merely opens a door” for other national interest to be taken into consideration, nonetheless the interest would not necessarily prevail. He contends that non-economic interest would be only considered as an “exception” to the right. Through the use of the flexibilities embedded in TRIPS, Professor Gervais contends the Preamble recognizes developing countries’ need to realize their developmental objects, such as innovation policy. However, he also stresses that the flexibility should be used in a manner that “[creates] a sound and viable technological

Some of the copycat strategies embraced by emerging multinationals have violated the intellectual property rights of their rivals in developed economies. As a new CEO of an emerging multinational brought from the outside, you have just discovered this issue at your new employer. What are you going to do about it?

In modern times, the faith that society has in the intellectual property system of the United States of America is fading. “[Patents] include a wealth of attempts to reward friends of the government and restrict or control dangerous technologies. Trademark law has shuttled uneasily between being a free-floating way to police competition so as to prohibit actions that courts thought were “unfair” and an absolute property right over an individual word or symbol.” (Boyle. n.d.)

The lawyer Gregory T. Victoroff said “At its best, sampling benefits society by creating a valuable new contribution to modern music literature. At its worst, sampling is vandalism and stealing”. Half-way between creativity and plagiarism, sampling is a controversial issue in the music industry and the infringement of copyright. In this assignment I’m going to be discussing copyright and intellectual property rights in relation to the music industry.

India must seriously examine its Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) position and see how best TRIPS (Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights) can be interpreted, as IPR laws are national laws. India should cull the best points from various laws to suit her future needs.

American firms must form more joint ventures with Chinese business entities to address the longstanding intellectual property rights (IPR) enforcement problems in China. To incentive their formation, the United States and China should create a bilateral agreement with benefits for joint ventures. About 86-90% of all IP protected goods sold in China have been illegally copied. As a result, U.S. industries lose billions of dollars and thousands of jobs per year. Local Chinese businesses have a vested interest in the counterfeiting industry, so China is unlikely to support IP-protection until incentives change.

Copyright, patents, and intellectual property laws are strong in the United States. However, different countries abroad may have lesser laws (or completely ignore) the proprietary usage of these intellectual properties.

American firms should form more joint ventures with Chinese business entities to address the longstanding intellectual property rights (IPR) enforcement problems in China. About 86-90% of all IP protected goods sold in China have been illegally copied. As a result, U.S. industries lose billions of dollars in revenue and, consequently, thousands of jobs per year. Local Chinese businesses currently have a vested interest in the counterfeiting industry, so China is unlikely to support IP-protection until it has economic incentives to do so.

The World Intellectual Property Organization (n.d.) helps one understand the importance of protecting intellectual property. They have spelled out several reasons of this importance including inventing new works in technology and culture, which allows progress to be made that, can be utilized worldwide. In addition, the legal protection of intellectual property encourages the commitment of additional resources for further modernization. Finally, promoting and protecting intellectual property encourages economic growth. It creates new jobs and industries. Protecting intellectual property also enhances the quality and