preview

The Between Basileis And The Demos Of The Dark Age

Decent Essays

The social contract that existed between basileis and the demos of the Dark Age was that of balanced reciprocity. Balanced reciprocity is “quid pro quo” or the expectation that a fair exchange takes place (Donlan: 51). The expectation of the social contract was that basileus gave and took as much as the demos. Thus, if the basileus were to take more than he was given from the demos, the contract made the basileus’ position vulnerable to dissolution. Although the basileus held substantial power over the demos, the demos were satisfied with the social contract because in return the basileus provided the demos with generosity, protection, and law and order. The demos expected the basileus to be generous to his followers, who were members of the demos and their exchanges to be balanced. When speaking to the other suitors, Antinous says, “Then we’ll seize his estates and worldly goods, carve them up between us, share and share alike,”(The Odyssey: 16.425-426). Antinous was more likely to gain the loyalty of the other suitors, which would extend his influence, because he was willing to distribute the goods equally among them. Odysseus and his men came upon Polyphemus and said “We’re glad to say that we’re men of Atrides Agamemnon…But since we’ve chanced on you, we’re at your knees in hopes of a warm welcome, even a guest-gift, the sort that hosts give strangers. That’s the custom.” (The Odyssey: 9.297-303), there is an implication that interdependence is to occur. By establishing

Get Access