The Clean Air Act (CAA) is a law that regulates air emissions from mobile and stationary sources. This law is comprehensive federal that authorize the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to protect people’s health and welfare and to regulate emissions of hazardous air pollutants (The United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA, 2015). The title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA) states the general requirements for states to submit Strategic Investment Programs to achieve and maintain the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the EPA 's actions regarding approval of those SIPs. On July 7, 2014, the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a submittal from …show more content…
Most of the submitted provision by ODAQ is approved by the EPA because the revisions clearly clarify and strengthen the SIP and are congruous with the Clean Air Act (CAA), but certain provisions of the submitted rules are not approved by the EPA because they don’t relate to the requirements for SIPs under section 110 of the CAA. Lastly, the EPA correct the SIP pursuant to the authority of section 110(k)(6) of the CAA to remove certain provisions previously approved by the EPA that do not relate to the requirements for SIPs under section 110 of the CAA (Regulations, 2015).
Several revisions are made by LRAPA about the types of open burning regulation exempt and they add a new exemption to previously listed ones. LRAPA clarify that certain materials such as plastic or garbage are prohibited from burning as fuel. More clarification has been done about residential fires for a recreational purpose by prohibiting yard waste use as fuel. Also prohibited such fires on red and yellow home wood heating advisory days. Religious ceremonial fires have been added to fire exempt as a new category. Some definitions have been revised in LRAPA 47-010 to clarify the waste and burn categories such as construction wastes, Agricultural open burning, construction open burning, commercial wastes, demolition open burning, industrial open burning, demolition wastes, and Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth Boundary. These changes to definitions make clear that
This source features a report by Jill U. Adams on the dangers, and current regulations of air pollution and climate change. Holding a Ph.D. in pharmacology from Emory University, the author primarily writes a health column for the Washington Post. She has also been featured in the magazines Audubon, Scientific American and Science. Because this article covers climate change, there is an inherent liberal bias. However, this bias coincides with irrefutable scientific data proving the existence of climate change. The audience for this article is anyone effected by air pollution and climate change; just about everyone. This source upholds my speculation that human beings have a significant effect on the climate. Before reading this article, I wasn’t aware that 55 million people a year died from air pollution. I found this source on CQ Researcher while searching for ‘pollution.’
The U.S. submitted its INDC to achieve an economy-wide target of reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 26%-28% below its 2005 level by 2025. With this plan, the U.S. has several laws related to its environmental policies. Among them, these are main four Acts (Korea Institute of Energy Research [KIER], 2016a): The Energy Policy Act established in 1992 was to secure energy security and revised in 2005 to decrease the reliance on oil and coal energy; The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) legislated in 2007 due to the necessity for energy independence caused by the unstable Middle East and high oil prices, so President Bush announced the 'Twenty in Ten Initiative ' that aimed to reduce 20% of the gasoline consumption by 2017; The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) was enacted in 2009 as one of the reflationary measures, and this included $8.5 billion investment for energy-related policies; The Clean Air Act (CAA), made in 1970, regulated the atmospheric pollution sources and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) used CAA to restrict the greenhouse gas.
In July 2003, the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District first amended Rule 4901 in the San Joaquin Valley, which focuses on regulations of wood burning fireplaces and wood burning heaters usage by homeowners in the valley. The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District Residential Wood Burning Rule 4901 lists all its amendments, exemptions, requirements, penalties and incentive programs that make up its purpose in limiting the emissions of carbon monoxide and particulate matter from the air of the
Another time it has been used was with the Clean Air Act. The clean air act was a mandate put by the national government, that all of the states must follow, that is unless that states want to face fines by the government. The Clean air act is a federal law that was passed in an effort to regulate air emissions from mobile and immobile devices.
Legislation to Authorize the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to Accept, as Part of a Settlement, Diesel Emission Reduction Supplemental Environmental Projects : Report (to Accompany S. 2146)." (2008): 1-4. UWSP Library Forward. Web. 01 Jan. 2012.
Before the Clean Air Act (CAA) was passed by Congress, the Air Pollution Act of 1955 and Motor Vehicle Act of 1960 preceded it. The two acts before the CAA did not really do much except jump starting research and throwing plenty of money at the research. When the research was released to Congress from the Motor Vehicle Act, Congress found out that approximately 60% of pollution was coming from vehicles; of the pollutants that were being emitted from vehicles, the most prominent that were found were Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Oxide (NOx), and Hydrocarbons. These findings pushed Congress to pass another bill that would help to slow down pollution, especially from vehicles. However, when the CAA was passed, it did not mandate any reductions
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) (P.L. 80-845, 62 Stat. 1155) of 1948 was the first major law enacted by Congress to address the problems of water pollution in the United States (n.d). Legislators created over 100 bills in an attempt to pass legislation over the previous half century, but were not successful. Industrial and urban growth caused by World War II in 1948, led to obvious, notorious pollution of the country's rivers, streams, and lakes, urging Congress to finally address the issue. Unfortunately, the act was not designed well enough to achieve the goals set out to address the issue. It did not ban pollution, only gave limited power to the federal government, and provided an extremely awkward enforcement mechanism. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act was not successful in preventing and reducing water pollution. Pollution continued to increase because of the federal government's inability to require any direct reduction in discharges. As a result, the quality of the nation's waters had no improvement. On the other hand, the act established a popular and political support for pollution control efforts. Congress rewrote the act in 1972 to provide more acceptable protection for the nation's waters. It also established the basic agenda for water pollution control, which was amended by Congress afterwards. Congress made changes to the act six times before rewriting it in 1972.
Although the United States passed the Clean Air Act in 1970, but also have half of Americans breathe dirty air (CBSNEWS,2014). The American Lung Association will release an air pollution report every year, which named the State of the Air. According to the report, although the air quality has despite the gradual increase but also have 166 million people breathe polluted air in the United States (lung.org, 2016).
Improved air quality wasn’t a subject of national concern until the mid 1900s. After decades of coal burning, unregulated gas emissions from cars and the excessive burning of fossil fuels, people started noticing bad air quality as a hazard to their lives. Over several decades, after seeing the costly effects air pollution was having on the environment and people’s health, interest groups like the Friends of The Earth club and the influences of Theodore Roosevelt and Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring finally came together to persuade the government to enforce legislation that would reduce air pollution. Because of these efforts, the policies of the Clean Air Act of 1963 and the Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Act of 1965, that aimed to control air pollution and raise air quality standards, helped create the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on December 2, 1970. Since then, the EPA has passed more air quality improvement acts, and amendments to previous acts passed, to increase restrictions on air pollutants, with their main policy concern being the Clean Air Act. Improved air quality acts imposed by the EPA have been successful in cleaning the United States’ air quality by reducing ground-level ozone pollution and reducing emissions, allowing for a decrease in pollution related deaths/illnesses and a better standard of living. The EPA, through regulations and the Clean Air Act, has delivered it’s promise to improve air quality in the United States.
The Pollution Prevention Act 1990 (PPA) came into existence in order to raise the interest in reducing pollution from the source or in another word Pollution Prevention in a way which encourages efficient cost reduction practice from the source.
In an attempt to clean up, the dispersant “Corexit 9580” was developed and although it assisted in cleanup, it was not tested for toxicity and caused the aforementioned blood and organ disorders that cleanup crews subsequently experienced. Mechanical cleanup was initiated using booms and skimmers, but proved to not be very effective as the thick oil and kelp tended to often clog the equipment. High pressure hot water was also used to remove the oil but was discontinued because it kept on destroying microorganisms and disrupting the food chain and preventing biodegradation.
Does the project comply with the federal emission offset requirements under the New Source Review?
Yes. The EPA should be granted deference to interpret a statute when the guidance from
Facts: The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 placed certain requirements on States that have not achieved the national air quality standard established by the Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to earlier legislation. Then in 1981 the Environmental Protection Agency put into effect a new permit requirement that would allow States to adopt something called a plantwide definition that allowed states to treat all pollution-emitting devices
since 1970. 40 percent of sulfer dioxide in the air has been reduced, as well