Introduction The concept of data security is not new to anyone. It refers to those technologies which have been discovered so as to keep the important data safe and out of reach from anyone undesirable. This has been done so as to keep the data safe from any intruders who could get into the computer system through hacking. As a result of advancements in the field of information technology, most data is kept on devices or in the clouds. With the help of such techniques, any unauthorized person could be kept out of a personal computer so that no one has access to any important data. Apart from stealing important data, there is also a chance that most data could be forged and changed so as to affect the authenticity of available information (Berman, 2016). This could not only affect organizations, but also individuals since the stolen or modified data could be important for them. Accordingly, the name data or information security came into existence. This branch of computer sciences started with the emergence of needing to keep data safe. The concept has been shoot and miss in areas of success in keeping data away from prying eyes. However, there have been some cases as to where security did not work. In this paper, I will examine the reasons Apple should stick to their guns and not aid the Federal Bureau of Investigations. Discussion and analysis Background Nevertheless the issue started when the Federal Bureau of Investigations contacted Apple for some important data off
In today’s world of instant connectivity and information at users’ fingertips, it’s vital that sensitive information is safeguarded against those who seek to do personal harm and profit from gaining access to the data. The key behind keeping information safe is the method in which it’s protected and encrypted. In order to appreciate how information is secured, users must understand the encryption concepts behind it. To do this, one must comprehend the current encryption standards, the trends and developments in encryption technology, the importance of securing data, the government’s regulations pertaining to encryption, the companies involved in research and implementation, the implications of leaked or stolen data, and a brief look into
What started as a private issue spread like wildfire as it was made public by Apple. This problem has created two sides that ask whether Apple should have the right to not oblige or if the FBI has the power to force them to make these means a reality. This specific issue opens up a greater problem that takes it outside the US and affects anyone with any kind of technology connected around the world: should the government have the right to access information on your phone? It’s a seemingly yes or no answer, but the precedent this situation will create makes it a lot more important as it can determine what the future of privacy on technology is like. When looking at the facts, rationality, and emotions that stem from whether the government should have the means
The dispute between Apple and the FBI has been one of the controversial topics since the shooting in San Bernardino. The FBI wanted Apple to help “unlock” the iPhone; however, Tim Cook, an Apple CEO, refused to provide the assistance. Mr. Cook was right about doing so because of two reasons: customers’ important information must be protected, and the FBI’s order is a dangerous precedent.
After Farook and Malik were killed following their crimes, an intense legal battle broke out between the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Apple. The FBI wanted the technology giant to unlock Farook’s iPhone, believing that it might contain vital information related to why he and his wife committed the act of major terrorism. Apple refused, realizing that doing so would violate the safety and privacy of their millions of customers. The situation only got more serious when a federal magistrate ordered Apple to unlock the iPhone. Interestingly, there were many cases to similar to this in the past, but none achieved near as much notoriety as this had at its climax. Part of that is because it also involves terrorism; many hope that it also
In today’s IT world every organization has a responsibility to protect the information and sensitive data they have. Protecting data is not only responsibility of security and IT staff but every individual is involved in protecting the information. The risks to information security are not digital only, but it involves technology, people and process that an organization may have. These threats may represent the problems that are associated to complex and expensive solution, but doing nothing about these risks is not the solution.
Data security has become a concern for every individual in our country. We hear about data loss from businesses like Target and University of Maryland at College Park and it is easy to wonder where the next security breach will be and whether it will affect us personally. This is intended as a look at the existing data security policies that receive the most public attention, Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA) (34 CFR) and Health Information Portability and Accountability Act of 2000 (HIPAA) (45 CFR. 76 CFR)with a focus on how these statutes apply to database security and design. These regulations affect every American in some way since nearly every person has been either a student, the parent of a
There is a fair bit both individuals and Apple could do to FBI-proof their phones and shield private information from investigators and cybercriminals. Those measures include multiple difficult for law enforcement to crack. “They are walking on a tightrope,” says Mark Bartholomew, a law professor at the State University of New York at Buffalo who specializes in privacy and encryption issues. In a recent letter to customers, in noted that it has routinely built progressively stronger protections into is products because cyberattacks have only become more frequent and more sophisticated. Apple has resisted the government saying that maintaining that software that opens a single iPhone could be exploited to hack into millions of other devices. As of now, Apple’s focal point is on the current battle with the FBI in a federal court while also trying to sway public opinion in the company’s favor. The purpose is to inform the reader on how to shield private information from investigators (“Turns our there’s a fair both individuals and Apple could do to FBI-proof their phones…” paragraph 2). The audience is the people as
With the world becoming more advanced and more and more devices being conceived, ie. Smartphones, Smart car, and Smart house, along with a growing dependence on, them even on the level of the government, we need to protect our privacy and safety. It has been statistically shown that our safeguards against hackers and foreign threats is severely lacking. Still, this a worldwide problem, and with the technological revolution, people don’t know how to keep their information safe, so it is our job as part of the government to protect our citizens even from digital
According to POLITICO’s post, Feds Drop Fight with Apple over Terrorist's IPhone, dated March 28, 2016, the Federal government asked Apple to help them access a terrorist’s phone. Apple, with their strict privacy laws declined this request. This prompted a legal fight between the Federal government and Apple, who have been in conflict since the release of IOS 8, which encrypted data in the devices. The FBI insisted that Apple should make a backdoor for them to access the devices in case of a national security issue. The issue went to court and a judge in California ordered Apple to unlock the phone of which Apple did not comply. According to Apple, the move could make every Apple customer vulnerable to attacks and
The FBI should try to find a way to get what they need that follows the constitution. If they still can’t find a way after a long time of searching, then they could conclude to using Apple. I do still partially disagree with the idea of violating the constitution.
Digital security, which can likewise be alluded to as data innovation security for the most part takes a gander at PCs, systems and information from an unidentified access.
March 29th, 2016, the Federal Bureau of Investigation targeted a phone that was linked to the San Bernardino attacks in California. (Three armed men opened fire upon a center for people with developmental disabilities, killing fourteen and injuring seventeen). The FBI asked Apple for their help to unlock the phone for them to investigate. Apple said absolutely not, because it would give the government a master key or backdoor to any Iphone.
A breach occurs when an unauthorized person accesses private information, either intentionally or unintentionally. Usually, it is referred to electronic breaches where data on computers, servers or discs fall into the wrong hands (Cook, 2010). In today’s world, barely a day goes by without some news reporting some type of data breach. Breach of data incidents grow in frequency and severity, despite the regulatory requirements for data privacy protection and incident notification becoming more stringent.
Data is stored when it is located on a hard drive. In this comparatively secure form, information is mainly protected by predictable barricades, such as anti-virus programs and firewalls. However, these barricades are not invulnerable. Companies and corporations must have additional levels of protection for data that is sensitive or secrete, from unauthorized intruders, if ever the network that the data is stored in is compromised.
In the last decade it’s amazing how technology has advanced over the years and will continue to advance for many years to come. Every year there is a new cell phone from Apple or Samsung, with new features that make our lives more convenient. From faster software to higher picture quality and so on. I am unable to recall the last time I used a camera to take pictures or went to the bank to deposit a check. Technology advances every day and many can’t wait to see what’s next to come. But with new technology comes greater risk for violations of privacy. In the following research paper I will discuss the types of security breaches and the cost associated with these breaches that businesses around the world face on a daily basis.