Enron: The fallout from the accounting scandal
Determine the primary factors that contributed to the downfall of Enron's financial practices
"Corporate managers are expected to maximize investor returns while complying with regulatory standards, avoiding principal-agent conflicts of interest, and enhancing the reputational capital of their firms" (Patrick & Shearer 2002). Before its demise, the energy company Enron was envied for its burgeoning balance sheets. However, gradually it emerged that its profits were based in sand. Through the use of creative accounting, Enron mislead shareholders, employees, regulators, and the media about its financial solvency. "A combination of aggressive accounting, off-balance-sheet deals and brow-beating of employees and advisers, allowed Enron management to create a virtual company with virtual profits" (Hill, Chaffin, & Fidler 2002). For example, "Enron bolstered profits by booking income immediately on contracts that would take up to 10 years to complete," quite literally 'counting its chickens before they hatched' (Hill, Chaffin, & Fidler 2002). In fact, many of these contracts were highly speculative, given that they were dependent upon the assumption that the energy market in the state would be deregulated something for which Enron had no assurance. "In those cases, Enron forecast when the states would deregulate those markets and then projected what prices would be under the currently nonexistent deregulated market" (Norris &
Greg Whalley, (former Enron President and Chief Operation Officer) had six to eight conversations last fall with the Treasury’s Department Peter Fisher, including one in which he asked Fisher to call Enron’s lenders as they decided whether to extend credit to the company.
Enron’s demise was led by the arrogance and greed of senior executives. The belief was they had to be the best business leaders in the United States. Many also believe that there was a conflict of interest with the auditing firm because not only did they serve as the auditing firm, they also served as a consulting firm to Enron. This enabled them to fabricate financial statements by building assets and hiding debt from investors. The loss of the recorded $1.2 billion shareholders equity meant that many victims of this fraud lost their jobs and their retirement funds.
I was first introduced to the world of business through a book called Pipe Dreams: Greed, Ego, and the Death of Enron. At the time, though I had difficulty understanding all the complicated underlying causes for the energy giant’s collapse, I was struck by the fact that Arthur Andersen, Enron’s auditor, failed to fulfill their obligations to conduct proper audits, and ultimately lost their CPA licenses. This made me interested in the role of auditors and the reasons behind their significant—though not always positive—influence. It also motivated me to learn accountancy at the University of Hong Kong upon graduating from high school.
Enron was named “America’s Most Innovative Company” by Fortune magazine. They were even successful enough to win it six times in a row. How does a company fall so far that they were the biggest bankruptcies at the time? Enron is known for its risky business tactics that would help keep them afloat in stock sales. Enron was headed by two main people that would go on to underhanded business schemes and charismatic acts that would betray the people who worked for the company. Kenneth Lay, the first CEO and the last as it collapsed, and Jeffery Skilling, the second CEO who was only CEO for about six months. These two people are very notorious white collar criminals. White collar crime is crime that is committed without violence but can have very
Power Failure: The Inside Story of the Collapse of Enron, Mimi Swartz and Sherron Watkins, 432 pages, March 25, 2003, Crown Publishing Group, ISBN: 978-0-767-91368-3
The particular causes of Enron 's failure are complex. There are lots of issues that have to do with the Enron collapse. Enron is a company that was called as Houston Natural Gas and then Enteron. It becomes politically connected player in the new deregulated market of energy. At one time Enron appears to have been a successful and innovative enterprise, principally engaged in trading and dealing in energy-related contracts. At some point it expanded by making substantial investments in a variety of large-scale projects. Although some of these were initially successful, others resulted in Enron incurring large economic losses. Then it appears to have embarked on covering up losses and manufacturing earnings. This succeeded for a time, but
As per various researches, it has been proved that today variety of issues are prevailing in our society and all of them should be properly catered so that no further issues can be raised and this will, in the end, helps in reshaping the entire structure of our society too. Therefore proper measures should be taken from the very start so that no negativity can be raised and this will eventually help in enhancing the efficiency of our society too. The ethical code of conduct is linked directly with the research ethics and this is the major arena that should be highlighted positively in our society in order to enhance potential outcomes. In an organization, it is important to see how work is done by keeping in mind the ethical code of conduct and how it is affecting the society. In the majority of the fields, information security is not directly linked with the security and ethics and this is the reason how it is leading towards various alarming issues too. Therefore it is important to see how to enhance the effectiveness of various products. This paper will focus on ethics and how Eron faced issues due to lack of ethical strategies (Conroy & Emerson 2006).
In light of the recent scandals that rose around big multinationals such as Enron and WorldCom, it has become evident that reform in the traditional corporate operations and objectives was to be encompassed in the organisations corporate strategies. Indeed throughout the years, companies main objectives were defined primarily as being economic objectives, Multinationals developed with sight of profit maximisations regardless to the other incentives, Friedman considered that to be the foundation for a well-managed company, it was further considered that the financing of any other sort of social corporate activities rather unnecessary. The expenses were regarded as expenditures for the owners and investors; this was a time where shareholders rights were regarded as conflicting with other constituents namely the employees, creditors, customers or the community in general. However this interpretation is seen as rather inadequate due to the nature of the amalgamated relation between both constituents. Stakeholders in modern corporate doctrine are considered as a core apparatus for the well functioning of a business. It is however often argued that the only way for a corporation to achieve better results and maximise its profits is to include other people in the process, individuals or organisations with direct or indirect interest in the well performance of the company, that is the reason why modern regulations and codes include a number of stakeholders other than the
In 2001, Enron Corporation of Houston, Texas, one of the largest corporations in the world, dramatically reduced their shareholder's values by thousands of dollars. Much of their stock dropped and many people lost much, if not all, of their money. On December 2, 2001, they filed for bankruptcy and became the largest company to do so.
Enron was one of the biggest scandals in accounting history. Enron covered all their troubled assets in complex SPE 's which then made their financial statements look appealing to potential investors. The auditor was also pressured into providing a complex financial statement that was very hard to read.
Enron was a Houston Based natural gas Pipeline Company formed by merger in 1985.The corporation Enron was effectively involved in energy broker, electronic energy training, global commodity and options trading. Enron was long viewed as star of the stock market. Enron was America’s seventh largest corporation. Enron was steady company with good revenue, a large part of Enron case was made up of paper.
The firm’s mangers lied on profit and concealed debts, all to show that the company was doing fine. Indications started to emerged in 2001, with a stock price as high as $85 in January though $90 in the previous year, descending to a record low of 26 cents (see the graph below). Although, things started going bad much earlier. In what follows, I present in chronogical order how business activities of enron were finally grounded:
Ethics in the business world can often times become a second priority behind the gaining of profits and success as a company. This is the controversial issue that led to the Enron scandal and ultimately the fall of this company. Enron Corporation was an energy company, and in the peaks of their success, they were the top supplier of natural gas and electricity throughout America. Enron Corporation came about from a merger between Houston Natural Gas and InterNorth. Houston Natural Gas was a gas providing company formed in Houston during the 1920’s. InterNorth was a company formed in Nebraska during the 1930’s and owned one of America’s largest pipeline networks. In 1985, Sam Segnar, the CEO of InterNorth bought out Houston Natural Gas for $2.4 billion. A year later in 1986, Segnar retired and was replaced by Kenneth Lay, who renamed the company and created Enron. Enron was the owner of the second largest pipeline in America that measured over 36,000 miles. The company was also the creator of the “Gas Bank”, which was a new way to trade and market natural gas and served as an intermediary between buyers and sellers. As the company continued to develop, it became more of a trader rather than a producer of gas. This trading extended into coal, steel, water and many other areas. One of Enron’s largest successes was their creation of a website called, “Enron Online” in 1999, which quickly became one of the top trading cites in the world. By the year 2000 Enron as a company was
The story of Enron begins in 1985, with the merger of two pipeline companies, orchestrated by a man named Kenneth L. Lay (1). In its 15 years of existence, Enron expanded its operations to provide products and services in the areas of electricity, natural gas as well as communications (9). Through its diversification, Enron would become known as a corporate America darling (9) and Fortune Magazine’s most innovative company for 5 years in a row (10). They reported extraordinary profits in a short amount of time. For example, in 1998 Enron shares were valued at a little over $20, while in mid-2000, those same shares were valued at just over $90 (10), the all-time high during the company’s existence (9).
Kenneth Lay, former chairman and chief executive officer (CEO) of Enron Corp., claimed to be a moral and ethical leader and exhorted Enron’s officers and employees to be highly ethical in their decisions and actions. In addition, the Enron Code of Ethics specified that “An employee shall not conduct himself or herself in a manner which directly or indirectly would be detrimental to the best interests of the Company or in a manner which would bring to the employee financial gain separately derived as a direct consequence of his or her employment with the Company.” Enron’s ethics code was based on the values of respect, integrity, communication, and excellence. Given this code of conduct and Ken Lay’s professed commitment to business ethics,