The Educational System Of 1988 Essay

Dewey focused on the individual saying that “education comes through the stimulation of the child's powers by the demands of the social situations in which he finds himself” (Dewey, 1). He believed that you have to tap into an individual’s “own powers, tastes, and interests-say” then that could be used to relate it to past, current, and potential future social situations in which to

Educational policies researcher Joel Spring (1996) discussed many arguments and historical background about various education topics found in the United States. For example, Spring tells us about the historical development of the Common Schools movement and the underlying groups—such as workingmen and political parties—that influenced the movement. In addition, Spring points out some of the implications the movement had on religious, ethnic, and multicultural groups. One particular idea that caught my attention was from the chapter entitled, “The Ideology and Politics of the Common School.” Indeed, my entire conceptual understanding of K-12 education had been predicated on the idea that high schools were part of the original conception of public

New York City consists of five boroughs, Manhattan, the Bronx, Queens, Brooklyn, and Staten Island. The borough that I reside in is Brooklyn. Brooklyn has approximately 2.592 million people inhabiting this district and approximately 23.4 percent of individuals who reside in Brooklyn, NY come from a low-income household or in other words come from poverty. With catholic and private schools being expensive, people have to rely on the education system to provide their children with a good education. In this paper I will be discussing the public school education system ranging solely up to high school in Brooklyn New York and giving a general idea of the New York education system as well.

The issue at hand here is “Should Schooling Be Based on Social Experiences?” This issue is argued by both John Dewey, and Roger Scruton. John Dewey believes yes they should, while Roger Scruton believes no. Dewey believes that students should learn using a different approach, Progressive Education. Progressive Education is education that focuses on students learning by doing hands on activities and learning about the interests of the students. Dewey believes preparing students’ for lives outside of academics is just as important as academics and that social interactions help students understand the academic information. Scruton believes in the more traditional approach, Essentialism. Essentialism focuses on what educators believe the students

Jean Anyon discusses the “hidden curriculum” that is distributed in various schools throughout this article. The hidden curriculum is the certain things in schools that are not “a part of the curriculum” per say, such as teamwork and collaborative skills, social engagement skills, manners, or rules. When thinking back to past articles I was able to note that Dewey was typically more concerned with the “hidden curriculum” instead of the actual content. Anyon’s article also helped the readers understand that we view the world by others who influence us. Jean Anyon researched five different schools that were

Dewey once said ” I believe that all education proceeds by the participation of the individual in the social consciousness of the race” (Dewey). To me this quote follows the fact that Dewey felt as if kids learn on their own rather than being forced to spend long hours in schools learning a curriculum that they can not even choose. Dewey believes that schooling has a psychological and sociological side of education that both have negative effects on it. I personally agree with Dewey to an extent. I believe that children learn

The Progressive Era was a period of the acknowledgements of the social and economic conditions in America during the 1890s to the 1920s. A social activist/reformer named John Dewey believed that “all education proceeds by the participation of the individual in the social consciousness of the race”. What he is trying to explain is that all the advancements towards education has to be done by the participations by the people who are aware of the different racial matters. In John Dewey’s book, “The School and Society”, he firmly states “what the best and wisest parent wants for his own child, that must the community want for all of its children.” which means that all parents should want the best opportunities for their kids just like a whole community would want schools to supply to all the kids. If all of his beliefs were pulled together into one, you start to notice that Dewey actually kind of works away from this goal rather than towards it. This is why, we should question his intentions and what he actually wanted for the education system in America. John Dewey is a very educated man, but he doesn’t want children to be at his standard, rather they should learn about social skills in school, not actual things that are needed to be taught to get a proper education.

Hirsch begins his argument by defining what it means to be culturally literate. He further explains that being culturally literate is not confined to any defined culture or even to one specific social class. Hirsch states that cultural literacy is the only sure way to provide disadvantaged children the ability to rise out of the same social and educational conditions as their parents. He moves on to explain how cultural literacy relates to the current theories of education with Jean Jacques Rousseau, John Dewy, and Plato. Hirsch elaborates that they all were half way correct in their assumptions, but that when put together, their teaching ways equal literacy.

This essay will explore the 1988 Education reform act by looking at past, during and after ramifications that the act brought . These will include the view that the 1988 Education Reform Act is influential in terms of controlling and progressing schools further could be seen as decisive, one reason being it could be a means of achieving control of the curriculum and the assessment, enabling them to progress and monitor their spending control, as well as the rise in the standards of school in terms of the competition and choice (Parliament, 1989). There are also views that education has since, in similar ways, become more like a business, this comparison was made by sociologist Stephen Ball (1990), this would be

Growing up in school, when “Dewey” was mentioned, one more than likely thought of the Dewey decimal system, which was used in libraries. However, that system was created by Melvil Dewey, and while he was an important person, there was another Dewey that impacted education in extraordinary ways. That man is known as John Dewey. John Dewey shaped the education system that we have today by reconstructing the progressive education. Dewey was a philosopher, and educational theorist who used experimentalism, as well as many other theories to change the way the American Education system was done. He lived during the time period where traditional and progressive education were coming together, so he used both to create his own personal philosophies. Once of his major philosophies was relating learning to society. Additionally, he used dualism as an approach to his philosophies that changed the education system. He impacted today’s education system in many ways, with his different ideas still being seen in school’s today. Incorporating multiple subjects into school’s, as well as taking a hand’s on learning approach are two theories that while many other philosophers believed in as well, Dewey used to develop the education system. John Dewey was a model citizen, that benefited society and the American education system in a variety of ways.

What’s the one thing that your parents always tell you? Get an education. We have heard it over and over again. You need a good education to get anywhere in this world. An education is the one thing my parents made sure that my brother and I had. They made sure we were at school on time everyday and ready to learn. My parents want me to have the best education that I can, but going to school in America is anything but the best.

John Dewey is known as leader of the progressive movement in the history of the American education system and his book, Democracy and Education: an introduction to the philosophy of education, could be used as a textbook to teach the foundations of the movement. Discrediting all previous educational and philosophic approaches as intellectually incomplete or inaccurate, Dewey first presents a new perspective on the nature of knowledge, education, society and philosophy. One fundamental theme of Dewey’s progressive movement is that education is growth and that growth is, in and of itself, the objective. Rejecting any notion of innate knowledge or of an ideal goal to strive for, the progressive

The first notion of education that will be addressed, is that of education in the area of growth. Dewey makes it clear that education does not consist of routine and that routine only hinders an individual’s growth (in the area of learning) (Dewey 53). Dewey believed immaturity to be the primary condition of growth; he furthers this idea by redefining the meaning of immaturity as the potential, capacity, or power to grow and not as a

John Dewey, another educational philosopher believed “Education is a social process. Education is growth. Education is, not a preparation for life; education is life itself.” (Inc.) He felt that learning took place only when students had internalized what they had gained through experience and practiced it in their own lives. In a progressive classroom, the teacher designs experiences for students with the idea that through experience, students build knowledge and skills. A society of individuals conforming to studying flashcards may be good, but a society of literate individuals consciously aware of why and how the facts on the flashcards and in mass media can solve new problems is better.

Many Americans believe that even though the U.S. education system is meant to be integrated, but there are still examples of racism and the imbalance of educational opportunities among the different classes of people. In an article published by the U.S. News and World Report, it was stated that “lower wealth, lower health, lower parental education levels, more dealings with the justice system and other circumstances create a perfect storm that leaves blacks [and other minorities] without the same educational opportunities as whites [and individuals with a steady income]”(Cook 4). These disparities begin to influence a child as soon as they are able to have the capacity to learn. Although there are only pieces of Aristotle’s works on education, he develops a clear point on the importance of education and how it is the path to happiness.