The Effect of Gender on Response Time Essay

In order to test this hypothesis, an experimental study was designed to calculate the time it takes for participants to respond to a cue under control or experimental conditions.

If the response time for this experiment by saying the word” now” falls between 100 and 200 milliseconds, I would conclude that

A better future is what everyone should be fighting for; by sharing ideas, by asking for changes and by changing itself. Personally, I believe that changing is what has always been moving the world towards improvement. As a girl, I have at all times realized how different I was raised compared to boys of my age and ever since I was a little child I never accepted that difference.

Gender differences have been recorded by researches from single neurons in the cell to system level processes (Cahill 2006), and certain scientists proposed that sex hormones influence the development of prefrontal cortex, and this is supposed to be the cause of the differences in working memory performance (Duff & Hampson, 2001). This study further investigated the existence and nature of this gender difference. A sample of 497 Monash University psychology undergraduates (385 females and 112 males; ages 18 – 64) were recruited for this study. Working memory performance was tested with online 'spatial working memory ' test, and 2D:4D finger length ratio was used as an indirect measure of sex hormone levels. The results revealed no sex differences in the working memory performance, but variance in 2D:4D ratio – females had a larger ratio than males. Memory reaction time was negatively correlated with 2D:4D ratio, thus, females had a quicker reaction time.

if the cost of leaving was high (they had to do an onerous task if

The last experiment performed consisted of three naïve subjects being tested together. The independent variable, the number of people in the room and their awareness of the experiment, was varied in order to show how individuals react to the potential emergency alone and in the presence of others in order to test for any differences in reaction time between

Statistical Analysis. The data analysis that was provided, shows percentages of obese children at baseline and after the 12 months period. Furthermore, the logistic regression analysis conducted on the 3 serum parameters describe the changes at the 12 months mark to address the research questions about hs-CRP. Study constructed means of measuring samples by differentiating between gender and POW. Although there were no specific instrument developed for this particular study. The researchers were able to drawn blood samples for the latex-enhanced immuno-nephelometric apparatus (BN II analyzer) to measure serum parameter proteins in the plasma. The collection process was conducted in a constant manner as the researchers collected the samples at the same time during both times. With the accuracy and precision of the instrument set to detect CRP at 0.02 mg/dL. POW were obtained by measuring weight and height and obesity/percentage overweight was described as POW>20%. Never the less, mentioned measuring techniques for height and weight were not discussed other the than using weight scale and measuring meter scale. McNemar statistical analysis was used to determine the relation between gender and hs-CRP. And odds ratio were used then to link relation between obesity and serum blood cholesterol levels, Age, Sex (objective Variables). The logistic regression analysis used had 95% confidence level of the odds ratio of log CRP. Data revealed sex different is

As predicted this study did replicate some previous findings. However, based on the data from this experiment sex differences did not yield a significant difference in reaction times when presented with the different stimuli.

Participants are asked to identify the color of the font, regardless of what the word says. A computer measures the accuracy of the response but also the time it takes to respond, which should be longer if they are shown an incongruent selection (Online Psychology Laboratory). In this test, the independent variable is whether the world and the color of the font were the same or different and the dependent variable is the response time. By looking at the response time compared to the word in the same or different color, the experimenters can observe the delayed response time they expect when the word and color don’t match.

The study was conducted on a Thursday morning from 10:00 am until 11:30 am in a Rigge Science lab. Fifty Creighton juniors and seniors worked in pairs and used a 30-cm ruler to measure each other’s reaction times. One partner held the ruler while the other, the subject, placed their thumb and index finger at the 0-cm dash on the ruler. The first partner dropped the ruler without any warning and measured,

As we all know, women and men are very different, exteriorly and interiorly. Our brains are wired differently, we process information differently, we react differently. Due to this fact, we multitask differently. Society normally says women have the upper hand when it comes to doing more than one thing at a time, and a lot of experiments can prove that statement to be true. In fact, I read quite a few that claimed that result but one specific example is an experiment I read on the Daily Mail website. Scientists in England conducted an experiment with 1,000 young men and women. They scanned each individual’s brain in an MRI machine and showed the differences. Females have stronger connections between the right and left sides of their

The summary for both congruent and incongruent tests show that our experiment did indicate that due to interference, the incongruent test did take longer. However, the results are inconclusive as to females being faster than due males due to outliers. The minimum time taken by females was 19 seconds, while the maximum time taken by females in the congruent tests was slightly quicker than males at 40 seconds. The means for both congruent and incongruent tests show that females complete both congruent and incongruent tests slightly faster than the males who take longer to complete both tests. The means for both groups are shown to have similar scores with the congruent mean for female time at 27.8 and males mean of 32.7 and the incongruent female test at 59.3 and males mean of 64.3. The minimum time taken by females in the congruent test was 19 seconds, while the maximum time taken by females was 40 seconds. The minimum time taken by females in the incongruent test was recorded at 27 seconds, while the maximum time taken by females was 2.93 minutes from looking at the male and female congruent times of 32.7 (m) and 27.8 (f) are generally 50% quicker than the incongruent times of 64.3 (m) and 59.3 (f), which is significant as the interference experienced within the incongruent times is 50%

In terms of validity, the testing undertaken measured exact reaction times with different stimuli present (independent variables), therefore testing exactly what was stated. There were numerous variables controlled, leaving little room for marginal error, however, minor factors may have been present, though not significant enough to impact results or make results invalid.

On the Race of Participants graph it shows which race was able to identify the famous and non-famous names faster. The graph Male and Female Participants, shows if females or males had more knowledge of the names. On the original study, this was significant to see if races or genders changes the results of the participants. The Repeated Measurement, was a strength in the study because it was a success. The study was an opportunistic self-selection, also a strength. The Limitations of the study was that some participants were talking during the experiment, Non-participants in the experiment area, Classroom music playing in the background, Misnumbering of participants, Wrong powerpoint was used, and classroom setup in both trials. For better results and improvement in this study the researcher recommends that the Non-participants are removed out of the room, no music in the background, recount the number of participants at least twice, and set up the classroom in a way that will be good for the participants in the study. The study was a success, the students were able to identify the number of famous names faster than non-famous names. Although, there were some limitations that could affect the results, the study was still a

The reaction time (RT) of students was measured in the experiment to determine whether light or sound stimulus initiates a quicker response time. The question of whether or not RT was related to movement time (MT) was also challenged. Each student performed two test in random order; one testing the reaction time of a red light stimulus, or visual reaction time (VRT); and the other testing the reaction time of a “beeping” sound stimulus, or auditory reaction time (ART). The student completed the VRT trial by simply receiving the stimulus and pressing a button. The student placing and holding their hand on a button starts the ART trial. Once the student receives the stimulus (beep) they press the adjacent button as fast as they can. The ART trial does not only include the data of the RT, but also the data from the MT. Having previous knowledge that light travels faster than sound; one can predict that VRT is faster than ART. The prediction that MT is independent upon RT can be made with the thought that there are so many opposing variables that could affect the MT of an individual unrelated RT such as old age