The Face Behind Bitcoin The Newsweek has gone too far by invading Satoshi Nakamoto’s private life without his consent. The reporter goes to the extent of going to confront Nakamoto from his residence in temple city where he decides to involve the police because he never consented on speaking with the reporter. In the letter he accuses Newsweek of printing false reports concerning his life, and this has created a great deal of confusion and stress to him and the family members. He finishes by asking the Newsweek to respect his privacy. The allegation made on Mr. Nakamoto is not justifiable in any sense since he personally denied being involved in the programming and invention of the bitcoin technology. The magazine is seen to have developed its own thesis on the programmer’s identity by matching Nakamoto’s name and career to the alleged creator of the digital currency system. He even argues out that he never heard the term Bitcoin until his son told him. The reporter goes ahead to his home even after noticing Mr. Nakamoto’s character of not being social to the public. In the story he is described to be a man with few words and very intelligent. The initial program document carried the name of Satoshi Nakamoto, and because the author chose to remain private and anonymous, it had been widely assumed the name to be a pseudonym. The reporter is seen to have gone to the extent of going to Mr Nakamoto’s home to confront him on the story which he earlier denied talking about
The early 1900s marked the rise of investigative journalism. Articles exposing corruption and greed within the government and businesses were extremely popular among the American people. In Theodore Roosevelt’s speech, “The Man with the Muck-rake,” he explains his thoughts and position on the pros and cons of muckrakers. Roosevelt demonstrates why the job of a muckraker is necessary in society, but also discusses how playing fast and loose with the facts can be an evil act that leads to damaged reputations and false misconducts. Through the use of metaphor, repetition, and enthymeme, he is able to convey to the audience exactly where he stands on the topic of investigative journalism.
This documentary isn’t just about the Gawker case, rather it probes into a deeper theme, focusing on several tales of how forces of today’s age - billionaires owning private money and President Trump – are trying to crush the essential power of the Press and rights given by the 1st Amendment. In the first hour through the documentary, the lawsuit subsequently reveals to have been funded by Peter Thiel, the Silicon Valley Billionaire. Theil secretly backed the lawsuit for a personal vendetta
Journalism and technology go together especially in our modern-day society. Ethics is a guideline that journalists uphold their obligation to the public and their profession to report the truth. Unfortunately, in this digital age, we have the resource that can verify one’s original work but also to plagiarize. Journalists should be honest, fair and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information. Journalists should also test the accuracy of information from all sources and exercise care to avoid inadvertent error (“Society of Professional Journalists: Code of Ethics”, 1996). In this paper I will discuss what role did digital technology play in the Jayson Blair scandal, how can it be regulated, and what guidelines can be put in place to prevent future incidents.
Nick Gala Gordon English 1 Honors 3/12/2024. The contrast between Atticus Finch and Jim Crow Laws The sharp differences between Atticus Finch from To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee and the oppressive Jim Crow laws show the battle between equality and unacceptableness between black people in the South. Jim Crow laws were first created to make sense of equality, yet their real effect was to create inequalities and injustice. Atticus Finch is the polar opposite of the ideas of the Jim Crow laws, He embodies fairness, justice, and equality, believing that everyone is of equal value.
From the case, we know that “The story seemed to break very suddenly. However, common investigative journalism, the target knew about the
Being published in a Yale news column grants him instant credibility and ensures that the piece is likely to be of sound reason. By not making assumptions and providing sensible arguments for all of his assertions, he adds to his already strong credibility. Furthermore, he is well informed and argues against unethical practices, which in turn convinces the audience he is of strong moral character. The topic is a moral issue and Martin aligns himself with the ethical side of the argument which allows the audience to see him as a strong source and helps persuade the audience to believe
Coined “mudrakers” by President Theodore Roosevelt, journalists wrote investigative articles exposing social, economic and political scandals. The writers detailed the many horrors of poverty, urban slums, dangerous factory conditions, and even child labor. No one was safe from the “mudrakers”, their articles took aim at the food and insurance industries, prostitution and political bribery and corruption. All which satisfied the American public’s appetite for scandal. Not unlike the sensationalism used by media today to help influence public
Tamar Lewin, a national reporter for The New York Times, in her article titled, As Interest Fades in the Humanities, Colleges Worry, which was posted on October 30, 2013, sheds light on the fading interest in the humanities amongst student. This is especially true for those belonging to Stanford University. Many scholars alongside Lewin, are now asking why this trend is occurring. As stated in the article, Stanford is known for its reputation in technology, and as years pass, students are beginning to transition from the humanities to majors belonging in the sciences. She fears that this will in time mark the end of subjects such as history, philosophy, foreign languages, and a plethora of subjects that belong to the humanities, leading to student that lack critical thinking skills.
Cryptocurrency is a digital asset that serves as a medium of exchange with no central authority and was created to prevent the issue of double spending. This problem is solved with the use of blockchains where miners confirm transactions on a public ledger. As of today, there are over 1,000 different types of cryptocurrencies, and at least 600 of these have listed market caps of over $100,000. Bitcoin, Ethereum and Litecoin are top cryptocurrencies trading today with their combined market cap topping $331B. Bitcoin, created in 2009, is the biggest cryptocurrency and has recently reached a net value of over $270 billion, with much of its growth being in the last few months. This has led to much
The line graph illustrates the information about international residents between 1400 and 2000, and the pie charts compare the percentage different continents in terms of the number of residents in the year 1990 and 2000.
Bitcoin (BTC), a cryptocurrency, is a type of digital currency which was introduced in 2009 by pseudonymous developer "Satoshi Nakamoto". Since then 12 million bitcoins have come into existence with a current market cap of around 8 billion USD [1]. The algorithm is designed as to allow only 21 million BTC to come into existence ever. Bitcoin uses peer-to-peer technology to operate with no central authority or banks; managing transactions and the issuing of bitcoins is carried out collectively by the network [2]. Bitcoin is not the first attempt. But none have managed before to take off so dramatically and with such wide adoption to achieve escape velocity. The questions which are important now are how the bitcoin managed this success in
Litecoin – is the second largest cryptocurrency in terms of capitalization in the market today. It reached a market cap of $1 billion by the end of the year, 2013. The litecoin was primarily created as an improvement to the Bitcoin, the market leader. Among the added features are - mining capabilities with the use of an ordinary desktop computer, faster processing time (2.5 minutes versus 10 minutes for Bitcoin), and a maximum limit (84 million versus 21 million) which is four times more than Bitcoin, its leading rival.
First, if it's still an international concept for you, cryptocurrency is any of a number of digital money that can be made use of for online deals without intermediaries such as financial institutions. Without financial institutions, cryptocurrency can be traded and made use of for business between 2 or even more individuals without the oversight-- as well as expense-- of those intermediaries.
To start off primarily, Bitcoin is a digital currency as opposed to physical currency that we’re accustomed to and use in our daily life. Straight off their site, Bitcoin is described as a pseudo-anonymous, P2P technology operating with no central authority or banks, it’s open-source, public, owned by no one and open for everybody to take part; but what does that all mean? “Bitcoin is the leader in a new generation of emerging currencies known as “cryptocurrencies” which aim to, among other things, facilitate the movement of money electronically while still maintaining a sense of privacy,” (Hobson)
Nowadays, the Internet has implemented great impacts on people’s life, and it also has changed the business world significantly. In order for companies to cope up with the changing customer demands, they must adopt new technologies not only to support their business functions but also to reduce paper works, reduce costs, and provide better services. Bitcoin is a currency of the Internet, distributed, worldwide, decentralized digital money that be developed as a new payment method. In Australia, the regulator has defined Bitcoin as property instead of currency for accounting purposes (King, 2015 February). Although Bitcoins are not materially existed, it can be exchanged for goods and services at places that accept it, the same way you would give someone a dollar for a cookie.