After the financial collapse of 2008, the mortgage environment changed dramatically for both buyers and brokers. In order to protect consumers and raise confidence in the market, the Federal Reserve Board introduced regulations that limited what banks and mortgage originators could do such as curtailing certain business practices and imposing stricter requirements on capital. However, these actions have unintentionally affected broker competition, causing big banks to exit the housing market, which has led to the proliferation of shadow banks and higher-risk practices. These unforeseen consequences could potentially put the housing market at risk by creating a negative environment for consumers instead.
The new regulations that were
…show more content…
This prevents mortgage brokers and loan officers from steering consumers into considering riskier loans in order to earn higher compensation. The regulations also removed the incentives that would entice brokers to push consumers into higher-yield plans by prohibiting brokers from sharing commissions with loan officers, who must be paid a salary.
While the Federal Reserve had the intention of eliminating these unethical lending practices, the result was a deterrence from the independent mortgage business overall. Without the prospect of earning commissions, loan officers lose incentive of accepting deals that would take relatively longer periods of time to close. They would be paid the same rate regardless of the kind of loan they make to borrowers. Furthermore, the regulations also have an important consequence when considered with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, where under “section 1413 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which states that any violation of the loan originator compensation rules will offer the borrower a ‘defense to foreclosure’ for the life of the loan” (Smith, 2011). Under this rule, a delinquent borrower can potentially prevent his or her lender from foreclosing on a loan if the borrower finds a violation of the compensation rules under Regulation Z. Consequently, large banks would be deterred from buying mortgages with
The foreclosure crisis is the second major financial dilemma of the twenty-first century. To solve this, the roots of the problem need to be dug up and exposed followed by replanting with an appropriately improved regulatory system to help build stronger roots for the future. It seems that the free market system can't be free anymore given its intertwining roots extend way beyond domestic to international financial systems. There are two fundamental causes to the latest credit crisis: 1) poor quality securitized mortgages and 2) insufficient underwriting for credit poor borrowers. Secondary (downstream) problems making the financial crisis more complex include underemployment and business failures. Many banks,
Mortgage law is as clear, consistent, and enforceable in the United States as in any place in the world, and far more so than in many countries. Why is this a vital element of an efficient real estate finance system?
The responsibilities of the mortgage brokers to the borrowers, lenders, and investors were to promote the subprime mortgages to these groups of people in order for them to take out a loan. Although they did fulfill their responsibilities of promoting and having people sign up for it, they mishandled on how people should be granted for a mortgage loan. These brokers were to desperate about earning huge amount of money due to the expanding market that they ignored the proper precaution that they should have taken when they
The duty of good faith and good dealing is implied in every contract. In recent years the mortgage industry has been seen as a prime example of how consumers and banks need to better understand and adhere to duty of good faith and good dealings. Consumers had the responsibility of
The regulation that I have chosen for this paper is amendment in the Regulation X i.e. “Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act” and Regulation Z which is for “Truth in Lending”, for establishing the new disclosure requirements and forms in Regulation Z for the most closed-end consumer credit transactions secured by the real property. This regulation is controlled by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. The role of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is to provide consumers information related to the terms of their agreements with financial companies during their application for a mortgage, choosing among credit cards, or using any number of other consumer financial products. The mortgage market is the single largest market for the consumer of financial products and the services in the United States, with approximately $10.4 trillion in loans outstanding. Since last decade, market went through an unprecedented cycle of the expansion and the contraction that was fuelled in the part by securitization of mortgages and the creation of increasingly sophisticated derivative products. This led to the collapse of financial system in 2008 and sparked the most severe recession in United States.
Those involved in the mortgage lending process have some duty to the borrower. They are expected to perform their specific duties in an ethical manner and
Prior to the 2008 economic depression, obtaining a mortgage was relatively simple for home buyers. However, many of those mortgages had provisions that made it difficult for borrowers to repay their mortgages (“Dodd-Frank,” n.d.). As a result, many homeowners lost their homes when they were unable to repay their mortgages, which led to the real estate crisis. In 2010 the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act, also known as the Dodd-Frank Act, was enacted to reform how mortgage servicers vetted borrowers and to eliminate the use of predatory loan practices (Cheeseman, 2013, p. 485). Under the Dodd-Frank Act, creditors must establish borrower’s credit history, income and expected income, debt-to-income ratio, and other factors before
Brokers: In most states, the requirement to be a broker was the same as that to be a loan officer, except the tie was mandatory. Where I live in Georgia, the Department of Banking and Finance had accepted an application to be a broker from an individual whose previous job was working the counter at Arby’s. The Georgia DBF required only that individuals take a one week course in Federal and State regulations, and then s/he could apply for a Broker’s License. Brokers not only deal directly with perspective buyers; they hire other loan officers to do so. For a responsibility of this proportion, these individuals should be required to have an advanced degree (Master’s or higher) from an accredited university in a relevant field. They should also be required to pass a test on the federal level. Finally, with the exorbitant compensation tied to selling mortgages, brokers should bear some long term responsibility
It is necessary to first explain what Thomas Sowell an economics scholar says “The cast of characters” (Sowell 2). The nature of the housing market makeup is much more than just a bank issuing loans. The importance is to understand what lies behind the scene and from there comprehend the causes of the housing crisis. The Federal Reserve System in general regulates banks across the county. The Federal Reserve also has power to “take action which affect interest rates and the money supply” (Sowell 2). The Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation are “two government-created, but privately owned, profit-making enterprises that buy mortgages from banks” (Sowell 3). The Federal National Mortgage Association is also known as Fannie Mae, and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation is also known as Freddie Mac. These Associations as stated above buy loans from banks, which ultimately eliminates the banks wait for 30 years of monthly payments. According to book The Housing Boom and Bust “Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac purchased more than one-third of all the mortgages in the nation that were resold by the original lenders.” The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is another major entity in the real estate housing market. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is also known as (HUD) and “exercises authority over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,
“At President Clinton’s direction, no fewer than 10 federal agencies issued a chilling ultimatum to banks and mortgage lenders to ease credit for lower-income minorities or face investigations for lending discrimination and suffer the related adverse publicity. They also were threatened with denial of access to the all-important secondary mortgage market and stiff fines, along with other penalties.
As with any business, the savviest professionals are those who are truly educated in their field, and in the case of sales, their products. Not only did banks offer exotic loans that were generally not sagacious for most Americans, but individual salespeople didn’t necessarily understand their products (let alone buyers) which made for a risky combination that led to the current crisis. People signed on the dotted line without understanding what they were committing to, and those employed to guide them through the process were no more versed in the products themselves. Enforcing more stringent certification requirements for individual loan officers would help salespeople to better understand their products, making them more capable of guiding clients into the best fit loans.
Financial institutions did little stop subprime lending, the popularity of these types of loans kept growing, and lending companies took quantity of loans over quality which added to the so called “housing bubble” (Burry, 2010). Financial institutions didn’t
Additionally, a primary factor in the financial crisis was unsustainable mortgage lending. Subprime mortgages increased from eight percent of total mortgages in 2004 to twenty percent in 2006 with more than 90 percent of these mortgages being adjustable rate mortgages allowing borrowers to qualify for loans for which they did not have long-term repayment capacity. Furthermore, lenders lowered their loan underwriting standards especially for loan to appraised value and repayment capacity to allow borrowers to obtain significantly larger loans than in the past. System institutions did not participate in lowered lending standards. The System is prohibited by regulation from making mortgage loans with
In the new system, an investment banker buys the mortgage from the lender, borrowing millions of dollars to buy thousands of mortgages, and every month he gets payments from homeowners for each of the mortgages. The banker then consolidates all the mortgages and splits the final product into three sections: safe, okay, and risky mortgages, which make up a collateralized debt obligation (CDO). As homeowners pay their mortgages, money flows into each of the sections, with the safe filling first and the risky filling last, contributing to their respective names. Credit agencies stamp the top two safer mortgages with a triple A or triple B rating, which are then be sold to investors who want a safe mortgage, while the risky slice is sold to hedge funds who want a risky investment. The bankers make millions, pay back their loans, and investors also make a worthwhile investment. So pleased are the investors, however, that they want more. Unfortunately, back at the beginning of the cycle, the mortgage broker can no longer find qualified mortgagers
The company’s incentive system also encouraged brokers and sales representatives to move borrowers into the subprime category, even if their financial position meant that they belonged higher up the loan spectrum. Brokers who peddled subprime loans received commissions of 0.50 percent of the loan’s value, versus 0.20 percent on loans one step up the quality ladder. For years, a software system in Countrywide’s subprime unit, sales representatives used to calculate the loan type that a borrower qualified for, did not allow the input of a borrower’s cash reserves (Morgenson, 2007).