Comparative Paper
Have you ever thought about every single thing that happens to you or around you in a day? Have you ever thought of the millions of instances that occur during the span of a year? A lot can happen.Mother Teresa once said, “ Yesterday is gone. Tomorrow has not yet come. We only have today. Let us begin.” That quote in my opinion really relates to my two books that I read, The Forest Unseen: a Years Watch in Nature and Out of Eden: An Odyssey of Ecological Invasion. Both books bring up and prove the point that a lot can happen in a day, and a lot has happened in a day, and a lot more will happen in the rest of the days in time. But these two books while having similar ideas and book content, they both are written differently
…show more content…
These two books have very parallel templates by which they follow, as well as the topics of the books, but one takes your boredom into consideration while the other one doesn’t necessarily care. The key idea being that nature and the species within can change exponentially over the course of time. The first book I read The Forest Unseen, takes place in Tennessee and follows the author David George Haskell around as he returns everyday to the same square-meter of land in the forest. Haskell’s goal was to open our eyes to what can happen on a microscopic level over the course of a year. Really trying to do so by bringing everything he saw into a vivid reality. Haskell really delves deep into the world of this small area of land and sets up strict guidelines he had to follow, no touching or affecting anything within the area and no changing of any course of action that was to happen. The book also gets a little weird but oddly entertaining at certain points as well, such as when he strips down and lays in the harsh snows of winter in order to feel everything the way that it does naturally. You could really feel his passion for writing while you read, I could almost feel the emotions he felt because it really came out in the book, and it was a marvel to witness. The other book, by Alan Burdick, didn’t have as much luck. In Out of Eden, Burdick follows the paths of invasive species as they travel about different locations all while thriving or doing very poorly. It’s a very face paced book about a very slow time frame. Out of Eden, is a book that takes views and facts from many different time periods and requires Burdick to blend it all together in a well thought out fashion. And while all the facts might be there and are concise (to some degree), they aren’t very well intertwined and leave the book feeling very blocking, and honestly, a little bit boring. Burdick, I feel
One of my main objections that I have with this book is that it doesn't present enough of a point of view. It is sort of like a bad research paper, without an opinion, it is simply an organized sheet of facts. Although I wouldn't call this book terrible or a failure, I would call it incomplete. It gives the feeling of reading an encyclopedia, but with more interesting details. It is understandable to have a weak opinion in an informational book, but no opinion at all is scarcely acceptable.
For the rest of my life there are two days that will never again trouble me. The first day is yesterday with all its blunders and tears, its follies and defeats. Yesterday has passed forever bye my control. The other day is tomorrow with its pitfalls and threats, its dangers and mystery. Until the sun rises again, I have no stake in tomorrow, for it is still unborn. With God's help and only one day to concentrate all my effort and energy on, this day, I can win! Only when I add the burden of those two frightening eternities, yesterday and tomorrow, am I in danger of faltering under the load. Never again! This is my day! This is my only day! Today is all there is! Today is the rest of my life and I
“Each day means a new twenty-four hours. Each day means everything's possible again. You live in the moment, you die in the moment, you take it all one day at a time.”
I did actually really like this book. I was not sure if I was going to enjoy it when the project was first assigned, but after reading for a while, I became really interested
"It could have been yesterday. It could be tomorrow." The author makes the place and time so
“ That was a memorable day to me, for it made great changes in me. But it is the same with any life. Imagine one selected day struck out of it, and think how different its course would have been. Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns of flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation of the first link on one memorable day.”
In Coates’ interview about his book, “Between the World and Me”, Coates presents the reality of the American Dream and how the Dream, along with the Dreamers, will not only terminate the existence of the black population but the Earth itself. In “Between the World and Me”, Coates writes to his son about being a black man in a country lost in the American Dream. The American Dream is the idea that everyone would have equal opportunity for prosperity and success in America. However, Coates reasons in his book “Between the World and Me” that the American Dream is a lie, and there was never an equal opportunity for blacks.
Below, please list the similarities and differences between the book, The Light in the Forest, and the movie. This list should be a minimum of 8 things. Please make sure they are in detail that you can understand. You should look at characters, events in the story, and the setting.
Overall, I did not enjoy reading this book. Since I knew about most of the information being stated in the book, such as Darwin’s theory and global climate change, it was kind of like listening to a lecture of something that you already know a lot about. Also, the fact that this book was straight facts and knowledge didn’t lead me to liking it either. It was just throwing so much knowledge at you that it had you wondered what you had just read after reading just one page. Because of this, the book got confusing and especially boring. Also the book had no structure and was put into chapters that made the reading more confusing. So in conclusion, I would not recommend this
Write a reflective paper on Richard Louv’s Last Child in the Woods book. As you are reading the book highlight passages that you agree with, disagree with, or that make you think. Think about some of the big ideas in sustainability: Small actions can lead to big impacts (both positive and negative) We have a responsibility to the generations that come after us.
“Sometimes writers write about a world that does not exist yet. We do it for a hundred reasons…The reasons for writing about the day after tomorrow, and all the tomorrows that follow it, are as many and as varied as the people writing.” (Gaiman xi)
Wolff is clear in the sense that he views Arden as juvenile with her tiny lies about being late for various, unbelievable reasons “she's had to give a client a ride home, because his car had been stolen from the clinic lot” (8). In the beginning of the story, while describing Thomas and Arden's relationship, Wolff makes the point that Arden becomes disappointed in Thomas when he is trying to be slow and gentle. This behavior sounds similar to a playground, with children playing, and the girl kicks the boy because she likes him. Also, in the beginning of the story, Wolff explains that Nedra changes her name to Arden to disassociate herself with her criminal grandmother but yet is caught doing the criminal act of stealing. The newly married couple
The year is 1987 and A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors is coming out in theaters. What better time to capitalize on Freddy Krueger, than by releasing novelizations of A Nightmare on Elm Street, A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge and Dream Warriors. The first two movies never had novelizations at the time, so it was the perfect chance to put them in book form. As for Dream Warriors, the author XXX, based his book on an early screenplay of the movie, so the story comes out much different than the movie we got, which makes it one of the top reason to buy the book.
One thing I found interesting in the reading was the research done by Nisbett. I never realized how much different our views and how we "see" or "portray" images differently. Especially in the portion where he Joel says, "Differences in "seeing" a forest is one way to illustrate the difference between American and Japanese or Chinese worldviews. Americans are inclined to see a forest in taxonomic categories." He goes on further to say we would typically see a forest as trees, bush, animals, birds, insects, moss flowers, and so on. But someone from a holistic lens, would see it as moss growing on the trees, birds eating fruit and etc. By seeing the comparison, it really showed that our education is different, We only see what we want to see,
In comparison and contrast of Jungle, chapter 14, and Silent Spring, chapter 1, both articles have the same tone and emotional effect. However the two texts are also very different in many ways. The most obvious similarity between the two texts is the use of fictional aspects to relay an idea of reality. The fictional aspect however is different: in the Silent Spring excerpt the town itself in which she refers is fictional, while in the Jungle the characters that are spoken of are fictional however based on real people. In Silent Spring, Rachel Carson describes a town suffering the absolute worst conditions possible, as a warning for what would come in the future, she explains at the end that this town does not exist.