When the firm is not able to or is difficult to honor the promises to the creditors, this situation is called financial distress. The firms need to figure out new ways to generate income and cut costs. At the same time, the money borrowed to finance the assets could be more expensive. As the financial institutions and banks may increase the rate charged for borrowed assets when a company is in financial distress. According to the definition of the financial distress, due to the increasing of the risk, the debts value of debt holders would devalue. From the perspective that the firm value is the sum of share value and the debt value, this decrease the firm value, and made it an important part of the costs of financial distress. In order to give the prediction of the value of the firm would survive, we need to know the history market performance, the history industry performance and the firm’s performance. For Capilano Honey Ltd, the agricultural commodities industry keeps growing in recent years and the growth rate is 13.38 percent in 2015, which is the highest rate in recent years.
In addition, the Australia economy and the firm’s performance are both very well in 2015. The predicted survive value could be higher than it was when financial crisis occurred. However, Capilano was not on the market when the financial crises occurred, so I picked a similar stock, CAQ holding Ltd in the same industry. This stock decreased nearly 40 percent during the financial crisis. Compare to
Companies’ Solvency, Liquidity, And Profitability Based On Current Ratio, Return On Sales, Earnings Per Share (EPS), Debt Ratio, And Price Earnings
Based on the financial ratios calculated, it appears that Pinnacle Manufacturing (the “Company”) is both using up cash assets and increasing its debt. The Cash Ratio has declined each of the past three years indicating that the Company has a decreasing ability to pay its current liabilities from cash and will be required to liquidate assets to pay off current liabilities. The Current Ratio has also declined each of the last three years. In 2009, it was 218.6% or 2.186. This means that for every dollar of current liabilities the Company had $2.18 in current assets with which to pay those liabilities.
The company’s cash has been decreasing over the 2 years however its current and quick ratio has gone up, from 2.26 to 2.53 and 1.06 to 1.26 respectively, due to its increase in accounts receivable and inventory, the company may need to minimize amount of sales based on credit or require however down payment on its installment sales. Haefren must also be offering more lenient credit terms to its customers since its average collection period has also gone up significantly, this could be correlated to the lax credit terms Wiegandt currently offers Haefren. Haefren’s return on equity is also declining, using the DuPont method, as a result of our low net profit margin and our decreasing asset turnover (as a result of lower sales and higher assets). The company currently finances itself with bank loans which have decreased while cash is decreasing, the increase in debt may be growing to an unsustainable rate as our debt to equity ratio has almost doubled from 5.84 to 9.37 between 1993 and 1994. This poses a major a problem for the corporation as cash and sales are decreasing and loans are increasing, the company may need to liquidate the warehouses. The warehouses could be a major factor in another problem: low profitability. Low operating profit margins of 1.6% suggests high operating expenses. The company may need to cut operating expenses by reducing by
Assessing the long-term financial health of a company is an important task for management in its formulation of goals and strategies and for outsiders as they consider the extension of credit, long-
In the case of Assessing a Company’s Future Financial Health, the case concentration is on SciTronics, a medical device company, performance measures based on the organization’s three primary financial data sources in Exhibit 1 & 2. Utilizing the 9 steps of corporate financial system, I will be able to analyze the financial health of the company to assess whether it will remain balance over the ensuing 3-5 years. The measures are grouped by focusing on “Financial Ratios” such as: 1.) profitability measures, 2) activity measures, and 3) leverage and liquidity measures. Using the financial data sources, I would be able to make recommendations regarding SciTronics 126 million loan request.
However, two known authors in this field of study believe that companies with low business risk obtains factors of production at a lower cost which may also pave to the ability of the firm to operate more efficiently (Amit & Wernerfet, 1990). Therefore, many stockholders faced a high of uncertainty; this is because some companies do not have the financial strengths to cover its debts that even may result to bankruptcy.
Return on Total Assets was 4.43% which is below five percent. That indicates that the company is not accurately converting its assets into profit. The total for Return on Stockholders’ Equity was 8.89%, however financial analysts prefer ROE to range between 15-20 %. The company’s low ROE indicates that the company is not generating profit with new investments. Lastly, Debt-to-Equity ratio for the company was 1.01 which indicates that investors and creditors are equally sharing assets. In the view of creditors, they see a high ratio as a risk factor because it can indicate that investors are not investing due to the company’s overall performance. The totals of these three ratios demonstrate that the company’s financial state is not as healthy as it should be.
Ford Motor Company is one of the largest United States automotive corporation company. The success of Ford Motor Company can be measured by analyzing and computing the three different valuation ratios, three different profitability ratios, and three financial strength ratios for three consecutive years. The outcome of the results can determine if the Ford Motor Company is a good investment. To enable investors and creditors to analyze these goals, Ford Motor Company distributes annual financial statements. With these financial statements, liquidity of Ford Motor Company is measured by analyzing factors such as the market value, market book value, price earnings ratio, enterprise value ratio, which provides the valuation ratios. Profitability ratio is the ability of business to earn a satisfactory income, which consist of gross
The company’s debt ratios are 54.5% in 1988, 58.69% in 1989, 62.7% in 1990, and 67.37% in 1991. What this means is that the company is increasing its financial risk by taking on more leverage. The company has been taking an extensive amount of purchasing over the past couple of years, which could be the reason as to why net income has not grown much beyond several thousands of dollars. One could argue that the company is trying to expand its inventory to help accumulate future sales. But another problem is that the company’s
The company is financially not doing well right now and the company has recorded a Net Operating loss for three years now. I think the company is not financially secure because of how unstable US economy can become. During the last American recession in 2007, which did not end for a few years ago. large amounts of jobs were cut worldwide and those individuals remained unemployed for long periods of time. Recession decreases people’s purchasing power.
Also, according to its leverage ratios, the company’s debts are not only very high, but are also increasing. Its decreasing TIE ratio indicates that its capability to pay interests is decreasing. The company’s efficiency ratios indicate that despite the fact that its fixed assets are increasingly being utilized to generate sales during the years 1990-1991 as indicated by its increasing fixed asset turnover ratio, the decreasing total assets turnover indicate that overall the company’s total assets are not efficiently being put to use. Thus, as a whole its asset management is becoming less efficient. Last but not the least, based on its profitability ratios, the company’s ability to make profit is decreasing.
Overall the long term solvency position of the company satisfactory and less risky, because managerial policies kept the repercussion of recession ( increase in interest rate) in mind and hence reduced its reliance on debt financing This gives it a secure position from the point of view of long term creditors.
Regression analysis seems to be extremely useful in determining financial distress and the bankruptcy of firms. In fact, in a particular study conducted by Bredart in 2014, it was presented that regression analysis was able to show an 84% prediction accuracy rate in determining bankruptcy of 870 firms between the years of 2000 and 2012 (Bredart, 2014). The independent variables used in Bredart study included profitability (net income/total assets), liquidity (current assets/current liabilities), and solvency (equity/total assets) while the dependent variable included financial distress.
Covenant’s balance sheet and income statement is a comparison of the years 2010, 2009, and 2008, and shows the company as struggling due to the current economy situation. The company’s total current assets decreased by 10.50% and include cash, short-term investment as well as inventory. The company had an increase of 9.23% in their total liabilities that was due to increases in their long-term debt as well as other liabilities. The net tangible assets for Covenant showed an increase of 7.24% over the twelve-month period. The income statement showed a decrease of 8.9% in the company’s gross profit during 2011. It also showed
This work aims at studying the effect of financial distress on operating cash flows of corporations. The interest in the area of financial distress has increased due to considerable number of corporate failures around the globe in recent years especially since the early 1990s. Notable failures include Global Crossing, Enron, Adelphia, Worldcom, HH Insurance, One Tel, and Ansert Airlines in 2001, and most recently FIN Corp in 2007.