preview

The Legal Consequences Of The Jim Crow Laws

Decent Essays

Jim Crow sets the guidelines for a violent mindset that will fabricate deadly culture norms. The Jim Crow laws did not directly address that a person of color like Emmett could not go into Bryants' store and supposedly "flirt" with her. It was not the law of division that allowed Carolyn's husband and brother-in-law to beat young Emmett to death, burn in his body and throw him in the river. It was the self-entitlement that white lives mattered more than blacks derived from Jim Crow laws saying the contradiction of separate but equal that allowed the killing of a 14-year-old boy on false accusations without legal implications for the murderers. There were unspoken rules and social standings that would not be tolerated anymore.
Emmett Till's mother, Mamie Till-Mobley, created a platform for people to be informed on the cruelty to her son and his funeral need to have his open casket to display her mutilated son and to not conceal the violence done to an innocent boy after a simple and not even said “Bye baby.” She sends this to the black press. Jim-Crow laws exemplify the proven deadly mindset that separate equivalates to equal. If so, the white mainstream would have properly addressed this heartless act of violence against this 19-year old kid who wasn't completely conscious of how his words could be taken as an offense and whose life was taken before he could even go to high school. The press plays a role in expressing and building awareness of social injustice, which

Get Access