preview

The Machinery Of Freedom By David Friedman

Good Essays

In David Friedman’s book, “The Machinery of Freedom”, he argues for anarcho-capitalism, the theory that believes the state should be abolished because it is unnecessary and a free-market should be put into place. Usually, anarcho-capitalism is defended from one of two views, consequentialist or deontologist. Friedman takes the consequentialist side believing that it is actually more desirable for the market to provide law and protection than the state because it gives the people choice to choose what they believe and competition will promote improvement. Deontologists, however, believe that any initiation of force is immoral, so they would prefer a law banning the initiation of force rather than private protection agencies. Despite …show more content…

A proponent to Friedman’s view would support this because consumers have better information than voters do. It has been seen election after election that politicians will tell the public what they want to hear in an effort to win, but during their candidacy they will not fulfill their promises. In an anarcho-capitalist society, this wouldn’t happen because when people choose their protection agency they would be able to look at the company’s records of how they handle their other customers’ emergencies. From this information they would be able to tell how they would be treated because companies usually follow the same procedures for every customer. Politicians, on the other hand, often have to face new problems so voters can only make an educated guess on what they will do next. Also, it is often difficult to know how corrupt a politician really is behind-the-scenes. Therefore, the people participate in rational ignorance because they know their vote alone won’t change the result of the election, so they don’t bother to investigate deeply into each politician. Also, in an anarcho-capitalist society everybody gets to choose which laws they follow by picking protection agencies and courts with beliefs that align with the person (Bill). An opponent to anarcho-capitalism may respond

Get Access