The Man in the High Castle: Criticisms of Reality and Dictatorship by Philip K. Dick

1296 Words 6 Pages
The Man in the High Castle: Criticisms of Reality and Dictatorship by Philip K. Dick

“Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.” -Philip K. Dick

Botwinick writes in A History of the Holocaust, “The principle that resistance to evil was a moral duty did not exist for the vast majority of Germans. Not until the end of the war did men like Martin Niemoeller and Elie Wiesel arouse the world’s conscience to the realization that the bystander cannot escape guilt or shame” (pg. 45). In The Man in the High Castle, Philip K. Dick writes of a world where Niemoeller and Wiesel’s voices never would have surfaced and in which Germany not only never would have repented for the Holocaust, but would have prided itself
…show more content…
Baynes, two Jews whom have somehow escaped Nazi execution and continue to live by means of changing their names and surgically altering their appearance (supporting the Nazi idea of Jewishness being ethnic, not cultural nor religious). While both under-radar Jews, each works as a pillar of society, and each represents deception.

Fink works in the antiquities industry, creating replicas of pre-War American weapons that are passed off as authentic. His occupation is reflective of society and of his place in it – to appear authentic but continue to deceive. Since the Axis has gained control of the world, the Nazi’s control over media that was present when the Third Reich came to power has accumulated globally and in a stifling way. In sharp contrast to our own reality, television never becomes popular and radio continues to be the predominant information source; because of the stifling of the development of American culture, there has been an acute interest in pre-war American memorabilia. In this way, a large market for forgeries has emerged, and Fink works creating replicas in this large secret industry. His struggle as an undetected Jew of low class parallels his occupation in an industry of deception. “No one could possibly estimate the percentage of forgeries in circulation. And no one – especially the dealers – wanted to. … The fakes would undermine the value of the real. It was fine until questioned” (pg.
Open Document