The New Jim Crow
The New Jim Crow is a book that gives a look on how discrimination is still and at some post more prevalent today than it was in the 1850s. Author Michelle Alexander dives into the justice system and explains how a lot of practices and beliefs from slavery times are just labeled differently now. The labeling creates legal discrimination, but most people over look it because it is hidden with words such as “criminals” or “felon” in order to legally enslave and segregate a certain type of people. This discrimination is located in multiple areas of the U.S. government. Alexander goes through the ways of how discrimination is still prevalent in employment, the housing market, education, and basic voting rights. Alexander
…show more content…
Alexander makes a lot of good points and truthfully I agree with the whole book. While reading the book I never knew that the War on Drugs was started when illegal drug use was on the decline. I also did not know that the War on Drugs was issued years before crack and cocaine moved into the neighborhoods. I also love the point that she makes about President Barrack Obama. She talks about how because we have an African American president does not mean that this country has defeated the concept of race. Race is now currently a fact whether we like to admit it or not. She feels that the new Jim Crow system is still in effect even if there are African Americans that are exceptions to the rules. Just like the original Jim Crow was used to control the advancement of blacks and used as a system of legal discrimination, the new Jim Crow uses those exact same concepts and just change the words we use. A prison is nothing but a plantation and a criminal is now the slave. The Reagan era game a race to the titles criminal and drug dealers.
Mass incarceration is now just a combination of the previous caste systems Alexander mentioned in the book. The slave system and the Jim Crow system are combined now and have become legal through prisons. I agree with the point of Mass Incarceration is set up to legally set a population to the side and not include them into the global economy and even when they get released the chances of them joining moving high up in the global economy is slim
In The New Jim Crow, Michelle Alexander maps out the parallels between the old Jim Crow system and the new racial caste system of mass incarceration. There are many profound similarities between these two systems, such as historical parallels, closing the courthouse doors, and racial segregation.
The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness was written by Michelle Alexander to expose the truth of racial injustice in the system of mass incarceration through the comparison of the racial control during the Jim Crow Era. She reveals how race plays an important role in the American Justice System. Alexander argues about the racial bias, particularly towards African-Americans, immanent in the war on drugs as a result of their lack of political power and how the Supreme Court tolerates this injustice.
After rejecting conservatives’ idea that criminal behaviors are caused by black culture, Alexander said that poverty and inequality are the “root causes” of crimes. She then includes a quote from Lyndon Johnson, “there is something mighty wrong when a candidate for the highest office bemoans violence in the streets but votes against the war on poverty, votes against the civil rights act and votes against major educational bills that come before him as a legislator” (45). Alexander uses this quote to criticize politicians who purport that they want to reinstall “law and order” but vote against bills that fight the antecedents of crimes. This may spark a series of questions in the reader, such as “if their motive is really to reinstall “law and order,” why aren’t trying to eliminate the origin of crimes? Why are they ignoring them instead? Alexander is insinuating that these politicians want minorities in prison, where they can control them, supporting her argument that the government always tries to control minorities. This also supports her argument that the “war on drug” and “law and order” movements represent the new form control system in the United States.
Racism in the United States has not remained the same over time since its creation. Racism has shifted, changed, and shaped into unrecognizable ways that fit into the fabric of the American society to render it nearly invisible to the majority of Americans. Michelle Alexander, in her book, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness shatters this dominantly held belief. The New Jim Crow makes a reader profoundly question whether the high rates of incarceration in the United States is an attempt to maintain blacks as an underclass. Michelle Alexander makes the assertion that “[w]e have not ended racial caste in America; we have merely redesigned it” using the criminal justice system and colorblind rhetoric. (Alexander 2). The result is a population of Black and Latino men who face barriers and deprivation of rights as did Blacks during the Jim Crow era. Therefore, mass incarceration has become the new Jim Crow.
In The New Jim Crow, Michelle Alexander develops a compelling analogy on how mass incarceration is similar to the Jim Crow era, and is a “race-making institution.” She begins her work with the question, “Where have all the black men gone?” (Alexander, 178) She demonstrates how the media and Obama have failed to give an honest answer to this question, that the large majority of them or in prison. She argues that in order to address this problem, we must be honest about the fact that this is happening, and the discrimination with the African American communities that is putting them there.
The third critical book review for this class takes a look at “The New Jim Crow” by Michelle Alexander published in 2012 by the New York Press. This book analyzes the problem with the incarceration system in the United States today that unfairly affects the African American community. This incarceration system is continuing to separate families, strip men of their freedom, and effectually make them into second class citizens upon release from prison as “free” men. She even describes that those who are convicted of these crimes are “relegated to a racially segregated and subordinated existence” (Pg. 4). Michelle Alexander is not only a published author but is also an active Civil Rights activist all while currently employed as an associate professor of law at Ohio State University. It is a very interesting read that coincides with where our class discussions have recently been. It argues that we as a country have not ended racial discrimination but just transformed it into a new type of caste system. It is an eye opening book that created an uncomfortable feeling while reading due to my level of ignorance on this topic prior to taking this class. I believe that this book will serve as an important narrative into fixing the race problems in this country because it brings to light what needs to be fixed. If any progress is made it will be because of books like this that expose the problems but starting to fix them will be the next step.
Though most citizens in the United States would agree that the prison system in the U.S. needs to be amended, do they see the prison system as a way to enforce the racial caste system? At first Michelle Alexander, the author of The New Jim Crow, did not see the prison systems as racially motivated until doing further research. After researching the issue, Alexander found the prison system was a way to oppress African Americans and wrote the novel The New Jim Crow. The New Jim Crow follows the history of the racial caste system and in the novel Alexander comes to the conclusion that the mass incarceration of African American is the New Jim Crow, or in other words a new system of black oppression. Though some might try to refute the idea of mass incarceration of African Americans, Alexander offers a well thought out argument with substantial evidence and data to compellingly link Jim Crow and mass incarceration and proves that it is an issue that should be on the radar of all U.S. citizens.
The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness is a book by Michelle Alexander, a civil rights litigator and legal scholar. The book discusses race-related issues specific to African-American males and mass incarceration in the United States. Michelle Alexander (2010) argues that despite the old Jim Crow is death, does not necessarily means the end of racial caste (p.21). In her book “The New Jim Crow”, Alexander describes a set of practices and social discourses that serve to maintain African American people controlled by institutions. In this book her analyses is centered in examining the mass incarceration phenomenon in recent years. Comparing Jim Crow with mass incarceration she points out that mass incarceration is
Racism is a thing of the past, or is it? Michelle Alexander’s, “The New Jim Crow,” main focus is on mass incarceration and how it occurs in an era of color blindness. Alexander also focuses on the social oppressions that African Americans have suffered throughout the years, until now. In this essay, I will discuss how the system of control was constructed, Alexander’s compelling historical analysis, and if the current system would be easier to dismantle. I would like to start by delving into how the system of control was constructed.
This “war on drugs,” which all subsequent presidents have embraced, has created a behemoth of courts, jails, and prisons that have done little to decrease the use of drugs while doing much to create confusion and hardship in families of color and urban communities.1,2Since 1972, the number of people incarcerated has increased 5-fold without a comparable decrease in crime or drug use.1,3 In fact, the decreased costs of opiates and stimulants and the increased potency of cannabis might lead one to an opposing conclusion.4 Given the politics of the war on drugs, skyrocketing incarceration rates are deemed a sign of success, not failure. I don’t totally agree with the book (I think linking crime and black struggle is even older than she does, for instance) but I think The New Jim Crow pursues the right line of questioning. “The prison boom is not the main cause of inequality between blacks and whites in America, but it did foreclose upward mobility
Michelle Alexander throughout her book introduces us to the way the “New Jim Crow”works in today's society. This new jim crow can be taken as a racial caste throughout the United States. She defines this undercaste as “A lower caste of individuals who are permanently barred by law and custom from mainstream society (Alexander pg 13) Not only does this have to do because of mass incarceration rates among black men, but it also adds to the effects of what the branded felons must face beyond the prison walls. She mentions this early on in her book that
I agree with Michelle Alexander on her view of mass incarceration, as well as the new racial caste system that has evolved in the United States. She states that, “we have not ended racial caste in America, we have merely redesigned it”. After reading her book The New Jim Crow, her point of view on the age of colorblindness is extremely bold. Over time, it has developed into many forms. The racial systems have evolved from exploitation, to subordination, to marginalization. As a nation, we have remained in deep denial about the racial systems. Even though it may look like America is an egalitarian society, there is too much occurring “behind closed doors”, that is often overlooked.
Almost anyone you talk to has heard the name “Jim Crow.” Yet, not everyone will be able to tell you what that name implies. Jim Crow refers to the unjust and harsh laws enforced upon men and women of color in the time after the Civil War, up until the 1960’s. Men and women of color were finally free from slavery, but the Jim Crow laws assured that they were still unfairly treated and oppressed. Michelle Alexander claims, in her work, The New Jim Crow, that the justice system we have today still discriminates and unfairly punishes men and women of color. She claims that the policies set in place by our government officials have led to African Americans being seen as only criminals and has developed a racial caste system that is similar to the one created by the former Jim Crow laws. She is determined in her belief that the biggest cause of this was the “War on Drugs” that focused on cocaine usage in the 1980’s, which has resulted in racial profiling of African Americans as criminals. This racial profiling has thus resulted in a mass incarceration of African Americans. So, is Michelle Alexander right? Are the claims she makes credible? Is there a racial caste system created by U.S. government policies to inhibit, discriminate, and oppress African Americans? If so, what can be done to change things, and how will it be accomplished? What is the best way to go about solving this problem? I will answer these questions and more with my own arguments in this book
The New Jim Crow by Michelle Alexander examines different experiences she had while working for the American Civil Liberties Union in Oakland, California. While working at the ACLU, she saw numerous accounts of racial discrimination throughout the criminal justice system. Race and the criminal justice system play a big part in the ideology of the racial caste system, as well as gender and class.
Alexander’s main point is that this is the New Jim Crow and that our rhetoric of “colorblindness” disguises the reality of a new racial caste system and she have argued strenuously a the central claim made here- namely that something akin to a racial caste system currently exists in the United States. Indeed, if Barack Obama had been become president back then, she have argued that his election marked the nation's triumph over racial caste.My conviction that to be traveled to reach the promised land of racial justice in US, but nothing like Crow has been existed.She explains that it “a stigmatized racial group locked into an inferior position by law and custom” . The criminal justice system is the gateway into the larger system of marginalization. Americans people have a difficult time talking about the race and class. Many black Americans people they cannot move yet, and they dont sharing anything with the society. She was cheery with Obama’s election and saw Jim Crow as something from the past. She did not see a new racial caste system yet, and when she started her job at the ACLU she find out that there was racial bias in the criminal justice system.Most people think the War on Drugs was created as a response to the crack cocaine crisis of the 1980s and 1990s, Some in the black community thought the War on Drugs was part of a government plan to facilitate the genocide of black people. This was not the same as what they say, but the guerilla armies that the CIA supported