The Problem Of Evil Essay

The problem of evil features an argument questioning the existence of god in relation to evil, attributing both atheistic and theistic replies.

The consequences of accepting that the goodness of actions consists simply in the fact that God favours them are obviously disagreeable. However, the consequences of accepting the alternative also appear unfortunate. If it is maintained that God favours certain actions because they are objectively good, it seems that their goodness is independent of His will. But such a view appears to be inconsistent with the conception of God as the omnipotent creator and sustainer of all that is. It means that there is a realm of moral values which exist quite apart from God's creative will and to which His will must conform. Such a view must inevitably appear blasphemous to all those who believe in God, for it makes God out to be less than He is.

An exclusively good creature is opposite to evil in a manner that it rejects evil as remote as it can.

As long as evil and suffering exists in this world, God cannot exist. More importantly, it does not only contradict with the idea of God being “all-good”, but also him being “all-knowing” and “all-powerful” as well. Because, if God only desires good, how evil was formed unless God was evil in someway. If not, then if God has all knowledge, he should know evil exists. Even more, if God is “all-power”, he should be able to the evil and suffering in the that he created. So, the existence of evil contradicts

Therefore, it is not the case that God is an omnipotent and wholly good being.

Still, a world in which the creatures freely choose to do what is right more often than they choose to do what is wrong has the potential for more happiness than a world with no or confined metaphysical free will. God therefore abandons his ability to ensure no evil will be present in the world in order to maintain infinite free will for all creatures. The parts of life that seem to be negative and evil are actually necessary for the world to be good and full of happiness and for life to be worth living. God is omnipotent not because he does everything he has the power to do, but because he possesses the power to do

That God is not the one creating these evils, but humans given the free will are. Mackie’s main objection to this is “if God has made men such that in their free choices they sometimes prefer what is good and sometimes what is evil, why could he not have made men such that they always freely choose the good?”[1]. He means to say that, If God, all powerful and all good, where to make a human being, why not just make all humans with the mindset of being good? It throws out our first point to say that God gave humans free will and some of them decide do evil things. This means God created an evil thing. Likewise, perhaps all humans aren’t evil, but when they are about to do evil things, the fact that god doesn’t step in throws out our second point, that God is omnipotent. It would be so easy for someone that powerful to do away with many of the awful things humans cause in this

Furthermore, if God determines the rightness and wrongness of everything just by saying so, then the entire concept of goodness and value becomes vacuous, meaning that God commands what he commands, leading to the idea of good

Some people refer God as the Omnipotent, that is to say a being that has unlimited power, and is able to do everything. God has four different attributes, he is omniscient, simple, eternal and omnipotent. The latter raises some difficulties, and paradoxes. In a first part I will show how omnipotence can be defined differently, how radical omnipotence differs with limited omnipotence and the issue with logic. Then I will show how God’s omnipotence raises some paradoxes and contradictions, by relying on the paradox of the stone and the problem of evil. Finally I will try to answer some questions concerning God’s ability to sin, to bring about the past, and to do things not done by him. Does God’s powers have a limit, could it then be

If he is able and unwilling, he is envious [meaning: evil], which is equally at variance with God.

One of the most interesting questions in the world is, “If a God exists, why is there evil in the world?” Most people respond with, “If God created the universe and us, then there should not be evil in the world,” when asked about God or any other powerful being. The problem of evil is also believed to be the cause of Atheism, and I do believe that there is a solution for this. The problem of evil is not a correct argument.

The epistemic question posed by evil is whether the world contains undesirable states of affairs that provide the basis for an argument that makes it unreasonable for anyone to believe in the existence of God. (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evil/). There are people that do not believe in God because they cannot physically see or touch him. Many people want to be able to do this before they can fully and truly believe in his existence. The evils that occur within the world that are seen as pointless evils but in fact they have a purpose to bring about good. A person may not understand the reason for these evils but God has a purpose for these evils.

Would there be more peace and tranquility? Or a world without choice and religion? In a world

There are many questions today as to the theodicy problem and why bad things happen. In this paper, I write about my approach to the problem of evil and why bad things happen to good people. This paper responds to the problem of evil in five ways. First we perceive God as an evil God, and we define the nature of evil. Free will, natural evil and life values are also seen as a resolution to the problem of evil.

and in justice.  Therefore he does not question the will of the gods in letting