The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Next, it is important to ask who are the people that really kill? Is it the gun or the person? People who defend the right to bear arms often state that it is not the gun that kills it is the individual that kills. Some feel the answer lies in that we need to introduce stricter laws on who is able to apply for license to carry guns. Gun laws vary from state to state with California being the most restrictive state to Arizona with the most lenient laws. These laws include background checks, waiting periods, and registration requirements to who can purchase and sells guns. Even with these laws in place we have still witnessed an increase in the number of mass shootings over the past few years. Implementing stricter gun control laws will ultimately not eliminate individuals from acquiring access to guns if they truly desire. State governments may require licenses to purchase guns but there remains an underground and online market to purchase guns, which does not monitor whether a person truly has a license or not. Rather than focusing on implementing stricter laws for control and ways to make the purchase

Despite centuries of evidence that gun control laws do not lower crime, stop violence, or make society safer in any way, gun control advocates continue to chip away at our Second Amendment rights. For a group (yes, liberals) who typically don’t care for hard work, working hard to rob us of our freedom to keep and bear, seems to suit them just fine.

The second amendment states that “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” taking away our second amendment takes away our protection that was given to the people in the original rights of the constitution. Gun control has been a topic of controversy since the New Deal in which the National Firearms Act of 1934 and the Federal Firearms Act of 1938 were enacted. Although some forms of gun control are useful such as background checks and the National Firearms act of 1938, people should not be limited by concealed carry permits or open carry laws. American citizens should not be restricted from the type of firearm they are allowed to buy, how they use them, or where they keep them unless it is unconstitutional.

What does the second amendment mean in the constitution? The second amendment is about Gun Control. What is Gun Control? Gun Control is your rights to own and use a gun. Guns are very dangerous and they are a serious issue. There are tons of accidental deaths caused by incorrect use of safety rules. What does the second amendment say about gun control in the constitution? The amendment states that “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. But do we all agree on this amendment?

“Law-abiding citizens use guns to defend themselves against criminals as many as 2.5 million times every year -- or about 6,850 times a day. [1] This means that each year, firearms are used more than 80 times more often to protect the lives of honest citizens than to take lives. [2]” (Fact Sheet) Some people in the U.S. believe guns are dangerous and no one should have a gun so the solution should be to have a gun ban law be past. But in reality that would not work because without guns in the hands of good people chaos would happen in the U.S. Having gun control laws made from the government, such as taking guns from current owners will not work in reducing crime relating in gun violence because criminals will always have a way to get guns whether it is black markets, across borders or illegal street sale.

Although I did not agree with the article How Gun Control Advocates Could break the NRA’s Blockade by Ronald Brownstein, it states some points that were hard to refute about gun control and that helped shape my argument. My stance on gun control is that we should not ban guns as a whole, but have more of a centralized approach on how people can obtain a gun. Being an American citizen allows you with certain alienable rights that are outlined by the Bill of Rights. We as a nation were given these rights at the creation of our great nation based on the fact that all men were created equal. Some of the rights that are given include things such as, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and the right to bear arms. The Bill of Rights was made because they wanted to place specific limits on government power. The author of the article is suggesting that we as a nation should ban all types of guns. This topic of banning guns or not banning guns is important because in recent events there has been a lot of mass shootings that have ended lives too early. These mass shootings are becoming more and more common the number of people that have been killed by guns within the last year has been four hundred and sixty-one. Also, there have been over three hundred mass shootings in the last 477 days.

Since 1791, the United States has allowed citizens the right to bear arms; citizens have depended on the ability to carry and use firearms. What if that just, went away? Every citizen would give up their firearm and there would be nothing for civilians to use to protect themselves with, at least, not something that they are used to carrying or having in their homes. The government should not restrain the ownership, the use, or the concealed carry of firearms for the reason that owning guns has shown to lower crime rates; keeping guns prevents the Second Amendment from being violated; and banning guns does not prevent criminals from disobeying the law.

The debate between gun-control and gun-rights advocates is one that is fought on many fronts and has intermittently raged on for many years. Today, one such battlefront is that of national concealed carry: gun-control advocates see an armed citizenry as one with more potential for conflict and unnecessary killing while gun-rights proponents see it as a source of deterrence for violent crime. Yearly in the United States, roughly 12,000 people die because of gun-related homicides, and many more are wounded in hostile situations involving firearms. While implementing regulations that prevent certain individuals, like felons, from owning and using firearms certainly are worthwhile, the process for individuals who qualify to own guns should not be arduous. They should be permitted to legally purchase and carry concealed weapons for their own protection, as it is not the citizens who obtain firearms through legal means that are likely to incite a violent incident. Those who intend to do harm to others will do so by whatever means necessary, and that includes buying or stealing a weapon illegally. It is evident that gun-control laws have not stopped gun violence: lawmakers need to empower law-abiding citizens by allowing them to utilize their constitutional right to defend themselves and others with a concealed firearm.

Gun control has been a heavily debated issue over many years to whether guns or people are the brute force behind the violence all over the world. People are the main reason behind violence in the world, guns don’t kill people, people kill people. Those who are mentally unstable or violent masterminds are unstoppable when it comes to completing a task of violence: “They plan methodically to execute their victims, finding the means no matter what laws or other impediments the state attempts to place in their way” (Fox, 2012). There is no simple way to cure or stop these people from obtaining or even using the guns in a despicable way. The right to bear arms is written in the constitution as a precautionary measure to protect those who may be in harm's way: “The second- amendment is clear - under the Constitution, these rights may not be infringed upon by any level of government, unless due process of law should dictate that these freedoms have been stripped of someone for some wrongdoing” (tenthamendment.net, 2018).

There are alot of different views on the matter. Some people are for it and some people are not. According to the new york times the goverment has issued a bill that will try to keep handgun out of teen hands that pose a threat to themself and others. Another key fact is that studies have found that in 2012 most young teen that were sent to jail for gun charges in states that have terrible gun control lawswould have to face a ban on gun ownership in states with the strongest control according to the new york times. Now lets switch views for amoment. Now lets say u are a teen growing up in the ghetto that is trying do the right then. Like go to school, or go to work to take care of your family. Every teen has to go through all of this adversity

Some people like it and some people hate it. Gun control is not needed. I am against gun control. Taking guns away from people will not keep criminals from finding a way to get one.Therefore rendering people defenseless. More gun control leads to less suicides and homicides. Gun control laws do not prevent suicide,people will just find another way to kill themselves. If the government tries to take our guns away,the people with guns are not going to do it peacefully. People don’t understand the second amendment, they need to understand and then they will stop. If they take our guns away, then the government will take over.More gun control is not needed; education about guns and gun safety is needed to prevent accidental gun deaths. Strict

Guns, everyone knows what they are, but the debate of if they should be owned is an ongoing one. The debate about gun control has been going on for centuries, especially in the United States of America. In the tenth century, the Chinese created what was called fire lances that shot shrapnel pieces at the enemy. This is considered to be the first firearm ever. Since then, weapons technology has advanced drastically to the guns of today. They are in such abundance and variety in the USA that people are concerned that the access to guns is leading in causes for violence. A lot of people in America believe that more gun control laws will prevent the acquisition of guns by people who could use it to harm others, more gun control laws are not the answer to stopping violence because The possession of guns is not a direct factor in homicide rates, and owning a gun greatly increases your chance of getting through a hostile confrontation unscathed.

Did you know that there are over 300 million guns in America? That is almost one for every person in the country! Much like cars, Americans have a several century old love affair for their guns, well most of America anyway. Guns are actually very controversial. The U.S is divided pretty much down the middle, with most Democrats for gun control, and most Republicans against gun control . In fact America is so divided on guns, that the slightest suggestion of gun control on Capitol Hill is heavily debated in Congress (Gun control). Why is there so much debate? Guns are very dangerous; around 30,000 deaths a year (and many more injuries) involve guns. Many people that oppose guns want them to be banned completely from the U.S., but if they can not get that, they want to at least pass gun control laws. What is gun control? ‘“Gun control” is a broad term that covers any sort of restriction on what kinds of firearms can be sold and bought, who can possess or sell them, where and how they can be stored or carried, what duties a seller has to vet a buyer, and what obligations both the buyer and the seller have to report transactions to the government.’(​PÉrez-peÑa) Those who are for gun control believe, that if there were less guns, or none at all, then there would have less crime, less mass murders. Anyone can understand the strong argument for more gun control, however, these arguments do not match the facts or statistics, a gun ban or stronger gun control takes guns away from law abiding citizens, but it does very little to stop criminals, who do not follow the laws that have already been set.

Recent events of mass homicides have caused for a need in gun control. Gun control comes in the form of full prohibition of guns, stricter regulations of hand guns, and ammunition control. When these restrictions are placed they raise questions on crime and control as well as ethical questions regarding liberties, rights, and responsibility of citizens who carry guns (Shaw, 2014). Hand guns are a big focus on gun control because they are easier to conceal and thus associated with more criminal acts; high-capacity ammunition is also a concern. Gun control issues have been around since the 1960’s and go hand and hand with other societal issues, like drug wars and sexual crimes (Shaw, 2014). At some point in time guns became more than a means of protection or survival tool, true reasons are only speculated. Between 1960 and 1980 handgun ownership rouse as well as the rate of homicides by

Mass shootings have become very common over the last few years. From January 1 to November 5 in 2017, there had been 307 shootings in which four or more people were injured or killed. Many think that the problem can be stopped with gun control, which is basically the regulation of the purchase and ownership of firearms in an effort to reduce their criminal or unsafe use. Others disagree, and say that gun control interferes with our second amendment. Overtime, we will have to come to a conclusion to stop the problem.