The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining In The United States

1391 Words6 Pages
Plea Bargaining
In the United States, there are many successful criminal prosecutions that end with jury trials. Many criminal cases are being resolved through a plea bargaining. This would usually be before a trail.
Plea bargaining is when there is an agreement in a criminal case between the prosecutor and defendant that typically involves the defendant's to pleading guilty in order to be able to receive a lesser offenses or sentences. When this agreement is being made it allows for the immediate resolution of cases where there is little disagreement, or the evidence of guilt is overwhelming. When a plea Bargain is taken place, it increases efficiency for the courts and able to reduce expense and time of the defendant.
A defendant would accept a plea bargaining to be able to avoid having a more serious charge, to have fewer charges being brought against them, or to avoid the expenses and stress of going thought a trail. When the defendant is plea bargaining it would provide some security because it allows them to negotiate the terms of sentencings which is under some other circumstances that may remained mysterious until after the trail is finish.
When a defendant has taken a plea, they are missing out on the opportunity to be found not-guilty. This is happening for multiple reasons even when it's a strong case. Therefore, also when a defendant takes a plea bargain they are waives many objections and opportunities to inspect or challenge evidence again the defendant.

More about The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining In The United States

Get Access