In the past decade, have the global efforts been effective to minimize the terrorism and political violence? After the 9/11 attacks from al-Qaeda, the war on terrorism initiated efforts to combat the effects of the attacks and it extended to include all terrorist groups globally. According to Monaghan, (Jackson and Sinclair, 2012) “efforts to reduce terrorism and political violence have been divided into two broad categories--counterterrorism and antiterrorism” and there were two approaches to the counterterrorism, “hard-line and soft-line” (p. 188). Hard-line methods included the military force while soft-line utilized methods to resolve the issues with negotiations. The anti-terrorism methods were focused on the defense and efforts to avoid the attacks by increasing the security. The assumption that these global efforts were the most effective means to combat terrorists became justifiable in the minds of numerous people after 9/11. Although, the acts of terrorism are devastating, I pose that the global efforts have not been effective to reduce the terrorism and political violence in the past decade due to the number of civilian deaths, injustice in detainees, and mistreatment of the Muslim community. To begin, counterterrorism tactics have been designed to eliminate the surroundings of the terrorist and/or the groups who utilize violent means to accomplish their goal. One of the means of counterterrorism is referred to as the “hard-line option,” explains Monaghan
Counter Intelligence can be defined as the efforts by an intelligence organization to counter a hostile or enemy organization from successfully acquiring information or anything against them. The intelligence organizations are responsible for the general security of nations and their main responsibility is to keep checking what the enemy nations are doing or have in plan. Equipped with the knowledge, they are then able to give needed advice to the government. Programs have hence been created for this responsibility, and are known as National Intelligence Programs. These programs are highly vulnerable to attacks from the enemies and the intelligence cycle security has to keep check to protect the process.
In today’s society domestic terrorism is one of the biggest threats to the United States. Some of these recent terrorist attacks include. Domestic Terrorism is when U.S. citizens carry out terrorist acts against other U.S. residents or groups.Many people think that the biggest threat of terrorism to the U.S. is from a foreign country, when in fact, the bigger threat is closer to home. Domestic terrorism is becoming a bigger threat to the U.S. than international terrorism and we need to find a way to prevent these attacks.
For our purposes, we will use the Title 22 of the US Code, Section 2656f(d), to define terrorism. It defines terrorism as “premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents” (Central Intelligence Agency, 2013). Examples of terrorism persist on a near daily basis around the world. Unstable countries, such as Afghanistan and Syria, deal with terrorist attacks on a constant basis. The common thread of these attacks is deliberate targeting of civilian populations in order to achieve political objectives. The best known and largest example are
Up until now, the world, and the United States specifically, has used brute-force tactics to combat terrorism, and to put it simply: it isn’t working. It is widely believed that the US even could have created and/or provoked terrorist groups like ISIS. For many years, the US has sent and stationed large groups in countries like Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, and Syria in order to “minimize” potential
Tactics to induce terror in pursuit of a political goal have been utilized by a multitude of organizations across the globe. This method of power control is known as terrorism, and due to its impact and unpredictability, it is highly feared and monitored today in the 21st century. Attacks of this nature stem from radical beliefs of religion, ethics, or other politics, and have been carried out globally, ranging from the 9/11 attack in New York City to the 2015 shooting in Paris, France. Terrorism over recent years has grown despite an abundance of efforts by many nations and international organisations to stop development of such groups. This growth is partially attributed to advances in digital technology and the furtherment of communication techniques, such as social media and web-based content, which has allowed for the spread of these radical ideas across the planet making it difficult to control the advancement of these beliefs (Council on Foreign Relations, 2009). Terrorism will never be able to be fully stopped due to the abstract nature and ideology from which terrorism originates.
For the first time in American history the United States population felt vulnerable at home, the reality of being subject of such cruel actions said present and the war on terrorism became one of our biggest priorities. Together we have been able to make a lot of strides against terrorism, however as terrorism itself and those who carry it out have changed, at times we have also failed to foresee possible threats or to make the right decisions on time. Since 9/11 we have been able to eliminate both the Taliban and Saddam Hussein, considered two of the world’s principal supporters of terrorism. We have effectively denied terrorist organizations the ability to operate freely, and have made it clear that we will definitely engage military with any nation supportive of terrorism. At the same time, we have reinforced our homeland security and redesigned our border security as a way to dissert any possible threat. However, even though the United States have developed innumerable strategies in order to prevent terrorist attacks there is still a lot to cover. We are surely safer than what we were at the time of 9/11, and the possibilities of an attack at such scale happening again is minimal. The West has successfully contained the terrorists who perpetrated 9/11. But al-Qaeda has adapted from the bottom up, producing a network that's scattered, disconnected and decentralized. The new jihadist movement doesn't have an operational leader, but it is every bit as dangerous as the old one.
Have you ever wondered why there are so many terrorist attacks in the United States? Why did the United States spends so much money on the military? This all happens due to a reason that the United States keep interfering into others countries’ problems, but most of the time nothing come out of it. Sometimes, the United States even make the problem become even worse. Just like the war in Iraq. The decisions made by the Presidents cause the problem getting worse day by day. Helping people out is a good thing, however, we should think about if that person need help or not. Which out the intervene of the United States, Iraq will not be in a situation like today. The United States will be less in debt and more money to fund other programs. There are more negative effects than positive effects when the United States meddles into others countries’ problems, so the United States should just ignore and stop worrying about those countries.
It is taking actions to address the problem and eliminate such heinous acts. Undertaking such an arduous task of reforming the implementation of preventing domestic terrorist attacks is raising serious controversy between political parties, not to mention questions of accountability and effective responsiveness to the problem. Pointing fingers and labeling the extremist with politically inflammatory terminology such as “extreme right wing” or “extreme conservatives,” is distracting from the real issues of coordinating intergovernmental collaboration and cooperation, structural and procedural reform, clarifying policy goals, centralizing information gathered and communicating efficiently between organizations, and utilizing technology and other resources to the government's advantage in this war on terrorism. These issues are not small challenges for the government, particularly the administrators involved in every organization at every level. In order to win this war and overcome, the players involved must tackle the challenges in front of them and implement effective and efficient
Annotated bibliography Bellamy, Alex J., Security and the war on terror, 1975-, 2007 This author is a university lecturer in the University of Queensland. He is a professor of peace and conflict studies and seems like he has a very broad amount of knowledge in the area of different wars including war on terror. His book security and the war on terror are pushed towards readers who care about the security of their country and the war on terror. ‘This edited book recognises a fundamental issue: while major crises initially tend to reinforce old thinking and behavioural patterns, they also allow societies to challenge and overcome entrenched habits, thereby creating the foundations for a new and perhaps more peaceful future’ .
What is United States counter terrorism strategy? Counter terrorism strategies can be is done in many different ways and on many different locations around the world. The United States and many other countries have issues with home grown terrorism. How does homegrown terrorism change our countries counter terrorism strategy. Why is Hybrid terrorism important to the efforts of removing terrorism and deterring terrorism in the future? Major events have affected our counter terrorism strategies over the years; September 11, 2001 was a major terrorist attack in our countries history transformed our counter terrorism strategy to what it is today. What was Khobar Towers and what exactly happened, and why is it important in our counter terrorism
and intelligence agencies use to combat or prevent terrorism. Counter-terrorism strategies include attempts to counter financing of terrorism. In response to the escalating terror campaign in Britain carried out by the militant Irish Fenians in the 1880s, the Home Secretary, Sir William Harcourt, established the first counter-terrorism unit ever. The Special Irish Branch was initially formed as a section of the Criminal Investigation Department of the London Metropolitan Police in 1883, to combat Irish republican terrorism through infiltration and subversion.one counter terrorism unit is the GIGN. the GIGN was established in 1974 following the Munich massacre. Created initially as a relatively small SWAT unit specialized in sensitive hostage
As a direct consequence of September 11, a number of substantial challenges lie ahead in the area of counter-terrorism.. The most prominent of these is the changing nature of the terrorism phenomenon. In past years, when terrorism was largely the product of direct state sponsorship, policymakers were able to diminish prospects for the United States becoming a target using a combination of diplomatic and military instruments to deter potential state sponsors. Today, however, many terrorist organizations and individuals act independently from former and present state sponsors, shifting to other sources of support, including the development of transnational networks.
Prevalent to the current trend now is the dependency of the society on Information technology and communication systems. Every aspect of human life is one way or the other linked and controlled by information technology tools. The importance of information technology cannot be over emphasized as its unavailability could lead to a form of disaster or the other. Pivotal infrastructures like finance, healthcare, education and security are driven by information technology. However, information technology and its benefits are accompanied by vulnerabilities and risks that can be exploited by people with the necessary technical skills. Individuals like ‘Hackers’ and ‘Cyber Terrorist’ can cause disruption to information systems, commit financial fraud and also attack computers and networks. These attacks and disruptions could result to violence against people and properties. In some cases, death, serious injuries and severe economic loss could occur as a result of these attacks.
Over the years there have been significant changes in how terrorism is carried out. With the changes in how terrorism is carried out there have also been dramatic changes in how countries counter terrorist attacks. The modifications in the way a country counters these terrorist attacks affects international relations of these countries. These issues bring about the question of how have counter terrorism methods affected international relations. To answer this question several things must be addressed which are, methodology, history of terrorism, and a literature review of multiple authors that have discussed this subject.
Instructs that for the purposes of this resolution, in accordance with the legal instruments related to the prevention and suppression of international terrorism made by the United Nations and regional bodies, an act will be regarded as a “terrorist act” whenever it is committed crossing one or more borders with the aim of achieving political goals through the dissemination of terror with the intent to influence beyond the immediate victim, and it is accompanied by one (1) major criteria, or by the concurrence of at least two (2) minor criteria: