preview

The Role Of Social Inequality In America

Better Essays

Introduction Studies continually show a racial, economic, and educational inequality within American society. This bias consistently favors the white population, with opportunities trickling down sparingly to minority populations. Social scientists devote a tremendous amount of time, energy, and financial resources in an effort to learn how to correct these disparities. We propose that one of the most intuitive means of creating this social change is to instill a desire in our children to join the battle for change. To accomplish this goal, we must first understand the factors that impact a student’s desire to get involved in creating social change. We think this understanding is critical for impacting the issue of inequality in America. …show more content…

This relates to conflict theory which states that people in oppressed populations are more likely to be interested in affecting social change. In American society, women and racial/ethnic minorities are at a clear disadvantage. The conflict between these groups and those in power creates a desire for change and interest in prosocial values in the disadvantaged. Research shows that black youth regard prosocial values more strongly than white youth (Beutel & Johnson 2004). Blacks also view social justice as more important than whites do (Ovadia 2001). Females also score higher on prosocial values and social justice because of the disadvantage regarding occupation opportunities, for example (Hiltin 2006). Income also affects prosocial values and students’ occupational aspirations (Hilton 2006, Nishishiba et al 2005). People from middle-class families view social justice as more important than people from working class families do (Hilton 2006). The economic constraints or opportunities also affect families’ views on autonomy and conformity, where lower class families are more likely to promote conformity and upper classes are more likely to promote autonomy (Hilton 2006). Father’s educational attainment and occupational prestige positively impacts, and mother’s negatively impacts, altruistic institutional values and occupation …show more content…

More girls value intrinsic rewards, and more boys value extrinsic rewards (Beutel & Marini 1995; Beutel & Johnson 2004), explaining the finding that girls have stronger prosocial values (Beutel & Johnson 2004). There is a possible tie here to life course theory in that efficacy of self implies agency and a choice in the path one will take in life. The life course of women, according to Beutel et al. (1995, 2004), is more likely to be altruistic whereas that of men is more likely to be more individualist. These courses differ from a young age as is evidenced by the expectations of community involvement seen in the Nishihisba

Get Access