account of Socrates’ defense speech in court. Plato was a student and admirer of Socrates. Due to this, Plato was present at Socrates court hearing, and it can be concluded Plato probably wrote accurately about Socrates’ defense speech. The Apology detailed Socrates’ rebuttal to the charges brought against him. These charges included Socrates manifesting new gods, teaching and corrupting the youth, and teaching how to skillfully win an argument using clever rhetoric. Throughout Apology, Socrates used his
The Charges Against Socrates The charges against Socrates were brought upon him by a man names Meletus. Meletus was a young man that Socrates did not know very well. These charges brought on by Meletus caused the indictment of Socrates. One of the charges in the affidavit written by Meletus against Socrates is that he is "corrupting the youth." Another charge that is brought upon Socrates is that of he is making up new Gods and disregarding the old Gods the Athenians believe in. These
Apology of Socrates. The Plato’s Apology is an account of the speech that was made by Socrates in his trial for which he was charged for not honoring the states gods but rather developed his deities. He was charged with not corrupting the youth of Athens the speech is not an apology but rather self-defense. The Socrates made the speech for his defense in an apology speech the speaker is not supposed to defend himself but rather explain his behavior (Plato, 2014). In the court, Socrates claimed that
In 399 B.C.E, the scholar Socrates was put on trial based on acquisitions by Meletus and other Athenians that say that he has corrupted the youth of Athens with his complex way of thinking. This trial is a matter of life and death to Socrates so he makes his defense to the people of Athens as to why he should not receive a guilty verdict. Although it may translate to apology, it stems from a greek word that means defense. Socrates has nothing to apologize for because he believes himself to have enlightened
Socrates is given one chance to defend himself before the jurors and avoid death or, worse to him, prison. One would expect Socrates to use this opportunity to convince the Athenian men of his innocence, so that he may live out his days as a free man, yet in his Apologia (defense speech), he decides instead to prioritize something before his life. Because of his inclination to better the populace, which he supposes will improve the city as a whole, Socrates, during the defense speech, attempts
trials to advance their ideas to large audiences. Socrates and Louis Riel are no exception to this and used their respected trials as a means of conveying a final political statement. This is evident in both Plato’s The Trial and Death of Socrates and Hans V. Hansen’s Reil’s Defense: Perspectives on his Speeches. Both men’s speeches can be seen as weak examples of forensic rhetoric and strong examples of political rhetoric due to the fact that Socrates and Riel both believed in a divine mission and
In “The Apology”, Plato’s written account of Socrates’ trial, Socrates rhetorical goal is not only to exonerate himself from the crimes he’s been accused of, but, more importantly, to show how he is devoted to the pursuit of justice. Socrates shows this by demonstrating his determination for doing what is righteous, rather than focusing on being abdicated from his crimes. Throughout his speech, Socrates uses an emotional appeal to establish himself as being on the side of truth, justice, and wisdom
convicted people will alter their appearance and speech to mold themselves into the roles a judge would discern as that of a good citizen. Socrates, however, did not resort to such tactics. Although his defense led to death, Socrates firmly believed in righteousness over anything else. Socrates would rather lose his life than lose his fundamental principles of being. While his defense would not be considered a successful one in today’s world, Socrates’ speech does not sacrifice his dignity which Socreates
The Three Modes of Persuasion: Socrates’ Apology In speaking of effective rhetorical persuasion, we must appeal to our target audience in a way that will get them to accept or act upon the point of view we are trying to portray. Aristotle said that we persuade others by three means: (1) by the appeal to their reason (logos); (2) by the appeal to their emotions (pathos); and (3) by the appeal of our personality or character (ethos) (Corbett and Connors 32). When Socrates, an infamous rhetorician, gave
The trial of Socrates often referred to as the Apology of Socrates was a defense speech made by Socrates against the accusations that have been made against him. In his speech, Socrates targets the jurors, the judge, and all of the spectators in the crowd. There are two sets of accusations made against Socrates. There are the original, older accusations and the current or newer accusations. Socrates uses his wisdom to attempt to show the jurors, and his fellow Athenians that these accusations are