1. When is the story being told in relation to the kidnapping? How do you know? (1) The story is being told in relation to the kidnapping in the beginning of the story in South Alabama. I know this because in the story in paragraph one sentence two it states " We were down South, in Alabama--Bill Driscoll and myself-when this kidnapping idea struck us". When I read this I realized it meant that they planned to kidnap someone. 2. How much does the narrator know about what is happening? How do you know? (2) The narrator knows does not know very much about what is happening because in the story it states in paragraph one sentence one " It looked like a good thing: but wait till i tell you". When i read this I realized that the narrator could
3. Why do you think the narrator seems impatient Because he deduces that he will meet
11. Most of the passage is told from a limited third-person point of view in which
“ The flashing lights from lightning was the only thing I had to see.”exclaimed Davie. The 1 hour and 30 minute movie was extremely better. To me it felt as if I was able to picture the scene in my mine. Also I could actually see it. The purpose of my paper is to persuade you, the reader to think that the movie is better. “Help… Help… Help. My dad is stuck under a tree. Come quickly!” “What is it?” They were trying their darndest to try and lift the tree. “ There is no hope!” Said one of the men. “ We are putting ourselves in danger. We have to get out of here!” Davie reamed “No I am not leaving until we get my dad.” The guys stopped and turned around. “Fine. Only for you.” That night it didn't stop raining.
Since “Annabel Lee” and “The Highwayman” are both narrative poems, the speakers of each story influence certain features of the plots. The narrator of “Annabel Lee” is also the affected lover who is recalling the catastrophic incident that is his lover’s death. Since he is actually a part of the storyline, he conveys the plot the way he had experienced it as it began “with a love that was more than love” but progressed onward to the “killing [of his] Annabel Lee”. The passionate narrating establishes his reliability as a narrator as the audience can truly sense his pain. However, the narrator of “The Highwayman” is not involved with any aspect of the storyline and, therefore, tells the story from a bystander point of view. Even though the narrator is not directly impacted by the events, they are still able to captivate the audience by utilizing lifelike elements, such as the “tlot-tlot; tlot-tlot” of the horse, to institute their trustworthiness as a narrator. Therefore, both narrators within “Annabel Lee” and “The Highwayman” add different elements of persuasion to their narratives to establish an authentic storyline.
On paragraph 4, the author states,"we selected for our victim the only child of a prominent citizen named Ebeneezer Dorset." This is the start of Bill's and Sam's scheme. But also on paragraph 10, it states,"That boy put up a fight like a welter cinnamon beaten last, we got him drove away." This is meaning, that they finally got the boy, and now they are ready for the ransom.
They each tell their side of the story, letting the reader into their thoughts. These multiple narrators contribute to help the reader understand each main character from different perspectives and show how and why things happened the way they did. Bailey also uses both a prologue and an epilogue to contribute to the richness of the story, which is a style quite common in the ancient Greek plays. In the prologue, Susan Hazen, Kevin’s mother, tells the reader in retrospect about the morning of the hunt and forewarns the reader of the tragedy that is to come (7). After reading the prologue we know that something horrible will happen, but Bailey leaves us wondering what the tragedy will be. Bailey also incorporates an Epilogue to bring closure to one of the characters.
The main character, Edie, provides the narration of the story from a first person point of view. She tells her story based on an event from her past. Because she narrates the story the reader is unable to be sure if what she tells of the other characters is completely accurate. Because one does not hear other character's thoughts one could question whether Edie
The author writes the story in a very interesting way. The way that there are only a few descriptions scattered about and that it focuses on dialogue is what allows us to figure out what the characters are speaking about and to find the intentions behind their words. The subject of this short narrative stands out boldly. Though it was written in
A narrator, who is without a name, tells of his first hand experiences throughout the story. This is in contrast to ‘Miss Brill’ in which narrative is delivered in the third person, with the use of free indirect speech to depict the story and portray the characters. By Wells selecting a first person narrative he draws the reader closer into the character’s mind set. This gives Wells the ability to convey the primary characters full spectrum of emotional thought, from open mindedness to the conflict and fear within him. First narrative provides the reader insight to thoughts and observations therefore adding suspense of the unknowing into the gothic style.
The narrator through out most of the short story comes of as a pretty shallow character. Besides his stereotyping tendencies he comes of as callous and un-imaginative. He shows his lack of
The author carefully crafts the story so that every detail contributes to a certain unique or single effect, whether it is as complex as irony or as simple as depiction of feelings. The Husband describes his absolute love for Ann as he reminisces about the years he spent with her and how deeply he "knows"
sentence we know it is the narrator’s story as she describes her experience and conversation with
2. The genre of this story is science fiction. Science fiction is a class of theoretical fiction, normally managing inventive ideas, for example, advanced science and innovation, space travel, time travel, quicker than light travel, parallel universes, and extraterrestrial life. Sci-fi regularly investigates the potential results of logical and different advancements, and has been known as a "writing of thoughts". It more often than not dodges the powerful, not at all like the related class of imagination. Truly, sci-fi stories were planned to have an establishing in genuine science, yet this association is presently just expected of hard sci-fi.
The narrator is reliable and the point of view of the story is in third person omniscient. The narrator tells us what all the characters like Millicent are saying, doing, or thinking, causing readers to be able to grasp a deeper understanding of everything happening around them.
As the story opens, already the reader is confronted with the topic of concealing the truth. The narrator speaks