preview

The Trials of Changing Tradition in Shirley Jones´ The Lottery and Hernard Tellez´s Lather and Nothing Else

Decent Essays

Tradition is an answer to how peoples live their lives. For many it is a social norm, how they have lived culturally for several generations. Despite the significance of tradition in many societies, it’ can still be very harmful to the people involved. Tradition doesn’t necessarily have to have a positive feature for many folks. In the end tradition could cause more harm than it is meant for good. Thus it is really important to change traditional values of communities to improve the quality of life for many people. In the short stories “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson and “Lather and Nothing Else” by Hernando Tellez tradition can be shown to be very submissive, that is stopping people from making any changes in ending harmful traditional …show more content…

He wants them to stay on their separate pathways. Even when the barber wants change he couldn’t act upon it because it wasn’t his job to kill. Killing wasn’t his job and was very difficult for him to go through so in the end he became submit himself in defeat. He couldn’t change the history of violence that would always follow his home, he was too passive and submissive to accomplish that change and as a result more people probably have died in Torres hands. The revolutionaries could have stopped the violence occurring all together if Torres was killed but the barber never really thought off, he just went to the conclusion that nothing good could come of killing Torres and the cycle of violence will continue on. This submissiveness is also in commonality with “The Lottery”. The villagers did nothing to change or protest against the lottery; Even Mrs. Hutchinson before she was picked as the victim was perfectly fine with the idea of the lottery. Calamity struck the Hutchinson’s when they were picked but Mr. Hutchinson wasn’t that distraught as “he looked down at the paper” and told his resisting wife to “Shut up!” (Jackson). This showed that Mr. Hutchinson knew there was no point in arguing against the lottery, it had happened fair and square. The chosen one had to be stoned to death and there was nothing to be done about it, after all this was a practice that had preceded generations in this community. His unwillingness to act proved his

Get Access