The Validity of The Evolutionary Theory Essay

Evolution is a change in the characteristic of living organism through time. Modern synthesis, one of the greatest intellectual achievements of biology, could explain how mutations and natural selection could produced large-scale evolutionary change. There are 4 mechanisms for evolution to occur; mutation, gene flow, genetic drift and natural selection.
Although, there are a number of misconceptions about evolution; it does not explain the origins of life, it is not progressive, natural selection is not about the survival of the fittest individuals in a population, humans are not currently evolving, it does not make organism better designed nor does it gives organism what they need to survive. This essay will describe further, 3 common misconceptions

Inherit the Wind is a powerful play written by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee that tells of the significant battle of conventional, religious powers versus freedom and the growing reality of Charles Darwin’s theories. This play is not the exact encounter of the courtroom battle but rather a dramatic retelling of one of the greatest courthouse showdowns in human history. Although many think the religious “Bible-thumpers” defending the Bible to be bias and inconsiderate in this play and in the actual account, those accusers may now look back and see that those “Bible-beaters” really did know what they were talking about they just didn’t quite know how to defeat the false belief of evolution but still keep the freedom of speech and press.

In order to engage an audience in a piece of work, an effective beginning must be implemented so that the reader is inclined to continue being invested in the work. In both Francis Bacon’s The Four Idols and Charles Darwin’s Natural Selection, an effective beginning is introduced to grab the attention of the audience. Both authors then use other rhetorical strategies, such as comparison and deductive reasoning to strengthen their argument, enabling the reader to engage in the work.

For more than 150 years, a revolutionary idea has been spreading all over the world. It helped us discover our origins and revealed our place in nature. It led to the unification of once independent fields of scientific inquiry. And it is being used today to tackle some of the most pressing problems facing modern civilization. But its implications go far beyond science. It has shaped our culture, politics, philosophy and religion, and it has been used to justify war and genocide. That idea is Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection.

Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee’s Inherit the Wind provides a realistic interpretation of the 1925 Scopes Trial through the tale of Bertram Cates, an educator incarcerated for including evolution in his curriculum. One word, a colon and two simple sentences reiterate the point that society is still far from being fully scientifically advanced and tolerant of outside views. The unwillingness of society to adopt more modern viewpoints persists in society today as it did 92 years prior.

In his own time, Charles Darwin was a controversial figure, and although long ago, that same controversy sparks today in the twenty first century. There were many who loved and many who hated Darwin, which has allowed the controversy to expand in recent years to include questions about his role in the development of the evolution theory. The theory of evolution was not created by Charles Darwin; however, through his On the Origin of Species, he logically expressed the theory which ultimately shifted the burden of proof from those who denied it to the supporters of evolution all of which was corroborated by careful observation.

Over one hundred fifty years after Darwin’s theory has been published, the evolution theory is still highly controversial. The idea didn’t go well with the public, Darwin was so embarrassed by the ridicule he received that the swimming-bear passage was removed from later editions of the book (Than). Darwin’s views brought him into fierce conflicts with others who continue to maintain that the account of divine creation contacted within the Bible was correct. According to Than, Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection is one of

In recent years, the political and religious movement that sought to integrate theories competing with the theory of evolution into the curriculum of various schools in the US. The theory that was offered was the theory of “intelligent design”, which even though not explicitly religious, makes for a theory much more compatible with religion than evolution. The danger of this move was that it was trying to dismiss a legitimate scientific theory as just one among the existing theories – an equal rival in pursuit of true explanation. However, what the advocates of this measure were actually doing is to equate scientific theory with a vastly inferior narrative about the world. It was, therefore, necessary for an author like Coyne (2009) to

The ongoing scientific investigation of how exactly evolution occurred and continues to occur has been an argumentative idea amongst society since Darwin first articulated it over a century ago. The scientific basis of evolution accounts for happenings that are also essential concerns of religion; both religion and science focus on the origins of humans and of biological diversity. For instance, in the reading “Truth Cannot Contradict Truth,” Pope John Paul II, addressing the Pontifical Academy of Science, discussed the matter of God as creator of man. The Pope explains that men cannot relate to animals because men are superior. The reasoning for that is because God created humans under his likeness. What the church is saying about mankind

Throughout many years, religion has been a support for many people; reading the bible and attending to church every Sunday, is essential if someone wants to follow God’s guidance. Even though there are many religions in America, Christianity is the most common one and for most Christian believing in the Theory of Evolution is questioning God’s Guidance which is unacceptable and disrespectful. However, analyzing Kevin Hovind’s overly emotional argument about the Reasons Why Evolution is stupid is notable the lack of logical thinking, unreliable information and offensive language which left the audience questioning about the credibility of his knowledge.

Darwin’s theory was a ground breaking achievement within the 19th century. It went against the publics opinion that religion was the basis of human development and evolution. Due to his research, discoveries, and the development of his theory, Darwin was able to mold the foundation for modern day evolution theory. Although his research was a remarkable feat, it came with a few drawbacks, such as Darwin’s own beliefs and concepts of gender and race, as well as the bias these concepts influenced in his theory.

He devoted a considerable amount of his lifetime fighting against intelligent design and creationism, which is the religious theory that God created everything on this world to be perfect and unchanging in the span of a week. His most notable contribution in this fight was when he provided expert testimony against the equal-time creationism law in McLean v. Arkansas, which argued that public schools should devote equal amounts of time teaching both the theories of evolution and creationism (quote AMNH). Gould went on to develop the concept of “non-overlapping magisteria” (NOMA) to describe his opinion that science and religion have completely separate bases and that one should not comment on something in the other’s realm. He puts forward this theory in his book Rocks of Ages (1999), describing it as “a blessedly simple and entirely conventional resolution to … the supposed conflict between science and religion” (Rocks of Ages). His definition of the term magisterium was “a domain where one form of teaching holds the appropriate tools for meaningful discourse and resolution” (Rocks of Ages). The principle of non-overlapping magisteria, therefore, provides a clear cut separation between the two magisterium. As Gould puts it, “the magisterium of science covers the empirical realm: what the Universe is made of (fact) and why does it work in this way (theory). The magisterium of

Biological evolution is the name for the changes in gene frequency in a population of a species from generation to generation. Evolution offers explanation to why species genetically change over years and the diversity of life on Earth. Although it is generally accepted by the scientific community, Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution has been studied and debated for several decades. In 1859, Darwin published On The Origin of Species, which introduced the idea of evolutionary thought which he supported with evidence of one type of evolutionary mechanism, natural selection. Some of the main mechanisms of evolution are natural selection, mutation, and genetic drift. The idea that all life on Earth shares a common ancestor has been around for

In 1859, Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species, introducing the theory of evolution. One hundred and fifty-six years later, scientists still accept this senseless philosophy. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay states, “Our school systems teach the children that they are nothing but glorified apes who are evolutionized out of some primordial soup” (Snyder). Schools worldwide have presented exactly this to the young, impressionable minds of your future doctors, engineers, scientists, and presidents. They assure us that if we give a small amount of mud enough time it can, by itself, bring about the art of da Vinci, the plays of Shakespeare, the music of Mozart, and the brilliant mind of Einstein.

Right after Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution was published, it was read and reviewed by people of different religions, interests, and professions. Many of its first readers were appalled. John Leifchild writes in the Athenaeum, “Man, in [Darwin’s] view, was born yesterday —he will perish tomorrow. In place of being immortal, we are only temporary, and, as it were, incidental” (Leifchild). He did not agree with the fact that humanity at the time could change, or has ever changed.