preview

The Worst Form Of Conformity In Arthur Miller's The Crucible

Better Essays

“The worst form of injustice is pretended justice” once said by Plato, an ancient Greek philosopher. Plato’s words today are as true as when he spoke them. Arthur Miller, American playwright, put Plato’s words into practice in his play titled The Crucible. In this particular play lies a conservative town with the appellation “Salem”. Salem’s residents are thrown into disarray when talks of witchcraft plague their town. Irresolute as to whether they were dealing with true witchcraft or not, the citizens pondered upon their next course of action. With the urgency of the situation and involvement of witchcraft, it was then decided; Salem needed help from outside forces. Miller presents to the audience a story of how three men named Giles Corey, John Proctor, and Reverend Hale persevere and succeed in speaking out against the social injustices happening around them. A theatrical drama should strive to provide material that can be applied to the modern day so that the audience can draw correlations between what is happening in the play versus what is happening in real life. The Crucible does just this by presenting to us the idea of conformity in Salem. Not only does it show that humans have not changed much psychologically since the 17th century, but how conformity itself is a form of injustice. When Judge Danforth says “a person is either with this court or against it, there be no road in between”(A3S1), he epitomizes the justice being dealt in Salem: polarizing and

Get Access