preview

Theme Of Good And Evil In Jekyll And Hyde

Better Essays

Everyone loves the classic age-old battle of good vs. evil. Just watching until the very end to find out that good eventually prevails is arguably the most satisfying thing about the rivalry and why filmmakers as well as authors take on the theme so often. However, good vs. evil is also something that human beings simply cannot escape. As long as there is good in the world, there will be evil; also, as long as evil exists, there will be some good to stop it. In Robert Louis Stevenson’s novel, he presents the reader with many different themes throughout. The main theme in Jekyll and Hyde is good vs. evil and the battle between the two. The second theme is repression and how repression affects the characters throughout the novel. Stevenson focuses on the battle between good and evil and the tendency to repress the true self in his classic work in order to emphasize that all people have within themselves these same struggles.
To repress oneself is simply to hold back what he or she is feeling inside and to keep it bottled-up. Dr. Jekyll is a very reputable citizen and lawyer in the city. Jekyll’s peers also think very highly of him and it is noted in the novel that he does charity work and that he genuinely tries to do good. In the beginning of the novel, Dr. Jekyll tells his colleague, Dr. Lanyon, who is a very rational and materialistic man, about his experiments. Lanyon dismisses these experiments calling them “unscientific balderdash.” However, Jekyll does not let anyone's negativity get to him. Jekyll sees “that of the two natures that [contended] in the field of [his] consciousness, even if [he] could be said to be either it is only because [he is] radically both” (49). In this wise observation, Jekyll is basically saying that even if he were able to be solely good, it would only be because he possesses both of the contrasting elements, which illustrates the fact that there cannot be good without evil. Jekyll then goes on to say that “from an early date even before the course of [his] scientific discoveries had begun to suggest the most naked possibility of such a miracle, [he] had learned to dwell with pleasure, as a beloved daydream, on the thought of the separation of these elements” (49). The reader

Get Access