To Snoop Or Not To Snoops?

One thing that led me to agree with Coben was when he spoke to parents and said, “... you’re listening for dangerous chatter..” (Par.11) He’s right, when spyware is used correctly, the parents are looking to make sure you’re being safe, it’s not strangers trying to find information about you. A parents job is to protect their child at all costs, and that extends to protecting you on the internet. Even though kids may feel like their privacy has been violated, if used correctly, you are not invading privacy, only giving protection from dangers unknown to them.

In this Coben tries to get the reader to think the idea of spyware is a good thing and not so bad as it sounds. It sometimes helps reduce negative feelings by explaining what spyware is and how easy it is to get. When Coben says, "you have the ability to log every keystroke your child makes and thus a good portion of his or her private world" it does kinda scare the reader a little because of how he phrases some words but then he adds, "that’s what spyware is—at least the parental monitoring kind" this reassure the reader. "Am I suggesting eavesdropping on every conversation? No. With new technology comes new responsibility" this statement shows us that he feels that we shouldn't eavesdrop on every conversation Which makes the reader think that now it won't be such a time

As the Internet developed, it brings a lot of benefits, such as getting information much quicker; however, it also brings problem. One problem that Internet brings to today’s society is children’s safety on virtual world; there are a lot of temptations attract kids on the Internet. This issue Coben discusses is a particularly controversial one because it’s hard for parents ignore the dangerous on the Internet; on the other hand, if parents surveillance kids’ privacy world, it’s really embarrassed for children. How could we solve this problem? What is a compromise way for both parents and children? Coben thinks parents should use spyware on the computer, but not surreptitious doing this; parents should tell

The title of the essay is The Undercover Parents, which was written by Harlan Coben. The essay was published on the 16th of March, 2008. In the essay, Coben presents his main ideas and thoughts regarding the use of spyware by parents to monitor children. He says that installing a spyware on the computer used by children, especially those in the teenage years, can help parents track what actually their children view on computers. In the essay, the author says that while it is quite hard to follow up on children while they are away from home and this causes parents to be so worried, installing spyware on the computers in the house really helps. Coben says that the program allows parents to keep track of the children

In his article, “The Undercover Parent”, Harlan Coben states that spyware is a good way to keep children safe. He supports his claim by using anecdotes and examples of how parents can use spyware effectively to keep their children safe yet also avoid taking away too much of their privacy. He also establishes a strong argument through addressing all of the problems that stand against his claim and how they can be solved. For example, he explains that parents will not be invading their child’s privacy (one of the main arguments against spyware), if they simply look for conversations that put the child in potential harm. Coben seeks to inform his audience, specifically parents, that spyware is effective in providing the safety of children by monitoring

In Harlan Coben’s article “The Undercover Parent,”(2008) he claims that parents should result to putting spyware on you tennager’s devices. Coben supports his claim by first stating “At first I was repelled at this invasion of privacy. Now, after doing an fair amount of research, I get it”, after a dinner he just had with friends who told Coben that they have put spyware on their teenager’s device, and how it kept him out of trouble. Coben’s purpose of this article is try to persuade parents that you should download spyware on your children’s devices yet, in order for Coben to get his purpose, he had to do some research and ask around for incidents that had occurred to his friends.. The audience is intended for parents of those who concern

In his essay, “The Undercover Parent,” Harlan Coben argues in the favor of the use of parental spyware on children’s computers. Coben’s claim for his argument is that by installing the spyware unto a child’s computer, you have the ability to log every keystroke your child makes and thus be better equipped to protect your child from harmful situations. Coben acknowledges parent’s hesitation and repulsion of spyware, and clearly defines for his audience what spyware is exactly and how it operates. The author reminds his audience with logical appeals that most parents do already monitor their children’s day to day lives, and that spyware simply offers a new way of protection. Coben then lists his audience’s common counter arguments such as simply

In Harlen Coben’s “The Undercover Patent,” Coben argues of being in favor of implementing spyware to the children’s computer. He claims that this protect their children so they could monitor their action when they are browsing the web. He is also convincing many parents to do this by telling letting them know that its not hard to place spyware on children computer. Also that this is not a bad idea after all we are their parents not unknown entity like the government. Coben also argues that this not as bad because the internet is already visible to the public. Therefore, this concept is to just basically have an eye on their children so they could protect them from cyberbullying and pedophiles. He also stated that he knows that children will

Hook. Background. Amy Webb discusses the security of online data by focusing on her friends and their child “Kate” as well as her decisions with her husband about what to post and what not to post about their own daughter. In the article “We Post Nothing about Our Daughter Online” by Amy Webb, the author cleverly uses labeling, pathos, and rhetorical analogies to argue her opinion that parents should not post personal information about their kids on social media.

Spyware on your computer may sound like a good idea to keep on eye on your kids, but would they like it? Harlan Coben’s article “The Undercover Parent” from New York times, March 16 2008< talks about using spyware might sound like a crazy idea but supposably it is not. According to Harlan Coben, Parents feel not concerned about the idea of using spyware, but it is best for your family, mostly your childs safety. He also states, parents worry about irrelevant things instead of worrying about their childrens doing bad stuff online, such as, chatting with pedophiles, rapist, or their drug dealer. From my point of view, I totally disagree with Coben’s statement.

There are many ideas that I agree with in the article, and in its claim. Coben explains that there is a fine line between being “responsively protective” and“irresponsibly nosy.” I strongly agree with this idea, because I have witnessed both areas. If you are a parent beginning to use “spyware,” you should know your limit. Coben’s claim is that

This article, The Undercover Parent, addresses the dilemma of the privacy of american children today. It is assumed in the article that there is a broad belief in america that teens should have their privacy and be trusted with the technology that they are using. The author argues against this and claims that parental oversight is necessary with teens today. He mostly argues that the safety of the child is at stake and that predators have the ability to prey on teens that aren't wise. The author brings up the point that it having talks with your child about uncomfortable topics such as pornography is important, and that it is easier to have these talks when they have some sort of context. Then he goes on to give an example of a father

The government should spy on its citizens because it lowers the percentage of danger, keeps the society safe, and can make the government stronger.

To begin with, parents spy on their kids so they could know what they bring doing during their days.In the article the author states that “61 percent of parents checked the websites that their teenagers visited, 60 percent visited their social media accounts and 48 percent looked through their phone calls and messages. Basically, what is this quote is saying is that parents are tracking their kids due to their websites that they go thru their cell phones who they being texting or calling and they social media such as facebook instagram. This is important because, it shows that parents are very careless for their child. So, if

Is your privacy getting invaded by your parent? Technology gets better each and everyday, but how will it affect you? It has put a big effect on teens so their parents can know what is going on while their teens aren’t home. Parents have worked around problems to figure out many things such as where they are, who they called, and how fast they are driving. Depending if a teen is responsible or not tells how much freedom the teen can have. Privacy is important but parents also need to consider the teens perspective. In the article “Parental Monitoring Or An Invasion of Privacy”Robert Foltz discusses how parents are worried about everything their children are doing at all times. In the article “How Private Is Your Private Life?” the author Andrea Rock talks about her privacy is always close to being invaded. Privacy is not always taken the right way, teens can be tracked, what the teens think about their privacy may cause problems, and the actions they make results in what they are able to do.