preview

Traditional Pricing Strategies For The Bop Market

Satisfactory Essays

Price – Affordability

Traditional pricing strategies often follow a continuum with two antithesis points: one being low margin and high volume, and the other being high margin and low volume. Between those points there are different pricing strategies that can be adopted by firms in order to differentiate themselves on the market (Thompson, 2012).
According to Prahalad (2010), firms have to transmute this traditional pricing strategy in order to prosper at the BOP market. They need to ascertain that their products and accommodations on offer are affordable to their target segment. The reason is that companies conventionally define the sales price predicated on the engenderment costs, without mentioning the high margins expected. This method does not consider how much the BOP consumer can or is inclined to pay for a certain product. Therefore, applying this traditional practice fail to offer affordable products to the BOP consumers. Products in this case are customarily well above what the BOP consumer can pay for (Prahalad, 2010).
An alternative pricing strategy is conventionally applied by reducing the quality of the product, making its features as simple as possible that could make the product marketable (Karnani, 2007). Garrette and Karnani (2010, p. 45) argue that “it seems the BOP consumers like inexpensive, low-quality products”.
This is the case of Unilever and Procter & Gamble selling for example diminutive packets of shampoo and skin cream (Prahalad, 2010).

Get Access