preview

Two Year Olds Use Pragmatic Cues

Decent Essays

One study shows that two-year-olds use pragmatic cues to differentiate reference to objects and actions. This study explains that children will use social-pragmatic cues to determine which object in a set is being referred to using a novel word. It also claims that if the whole-object constraint exists, then it can “very easily be overridden” by social-pragmatic cues. In the study, the researchers conducted two experiments. The first study had two-year old children hear novel word said in conjunction with a name-less action being performed on a novel object. They then went through a training procedure to make sure they did not know the names of the objects presented. Then, the experimenter presented the child with three objects, a spoon, a ball, and a cup. The experimenter then asked the children to show her the …show more content…

The second study consisted of the same conditions as the first but with the added experimenter priming children to perform the action associated with each object. The researchers’ findings support the idea that young children use a plethora of pragmatic cues to figure out an adult’s semantic intentions. The results of this study demonstrated that under the context of the experiment, children could learn novel names for objects solely based on pragmatic cues. These data suggest that not only are social-pragmatic cues important for word learning, but also that these same cues can easily override the supposed existence of the whole-object constraint. The researchers also argue that the existence of the object-bias may actually be a result of pragmatics. (Nameera Akhtar & Michael Tomasello, 1995). This could be the case because if an infant is born into a culture that consists of adults constantly pointing to objects and naming them, then it is very possible that the whole-object constraint is a result of social-pragmatic cues from

Get Access