Understanding the Fair Sentencing Act

mandatory minimum sentencing. The Committee decided the guidelines would be set the levels in the Drug Quantity Table (Hinojosa 1998). This would be done to create a set standard for levels 26 and 32. see table 1 {Table 1 About Here} These levels would work along with a standard set of program ranges that are above the statutory mandatory minimum sentencing laws (Weld 1986). Congress was not in favor of the sentencing table and told the USSC to prepare to research and present their findings

2014). Delivery of justice is the core function of the law enforcement agencies. Justice is delivered through hearings which lead to sentencing. However, there are times when the justice system is not totally fair. This is when other factors such as profiling come along. In order to ensure that the justice system is fair, it is important to ensure that criminal sentencing is done with the utmost level of precision. This is further explored in this paper. According to Jung, Ahn-Redding, and Allison (2014)

been developed in order to try and keep the process fair to both sides and ensure consistency between trials. The implementation of legal aid ensures that poorer offenders have access to the legal system and receive a fair trial. The measures both legal and non-legal through the criminal trial process ensure that each offender receives a fair trial in which they can be correctly convicted and effectively sentenced. Furthermore, throughout sentencing and punishment various legal and non-legal measures

strict punishment including harsh sentencing moreover that rehabilitation is without value. Two conflicting views are being examined from Eugene H. Methvin, who is a supporter of mandatory sentencing as well as ‘three strikes’ sentencing that can result in life sentences being mandatory for repeat offenders even if they are non-violent crimes. On the other hand, is David Shichor, who supports sentencing that is efficient and fair especially since harsh sentencing does not reduce crime. Two works

and indeterminate sentencing, there’s an ancient debate about judicial discretion in sentencing.” Proponents argue that mandatory minimum sentencing can place a significant hardship on correctional budgets while at the same time, threatening an increase of an inmate’s claim that their rights pursuant to the Eighth Amendment protection of cruel and unusual punishment have been violated. Opponents of fixed sentencing tend to posit that mandatory (determinate) sentencing can act as a deterrent, which

Definition of a crime Crime is a harmful act that violates the law and may be prosecuted by the state. Crime can be an illegal activity, serious wrongdoing and also failure to act or omission. Elements of an offence Offence consists of five elements: 1) The actus reus; 2) The mens rea; 3) A unity of actus reus and mens rea; 4) The causation, which is the fact that the conduct caused something; which 5) Resulted in social harm. For better understanding; Mens Rea also known as 'Guilty Mind’ is

committed these juveniles get tried as adults and receive adult sentencings. Many people argue that such juveniles should not be tried as adults because they are just kids and are still developing. In my opinion, I agree that juveniles should not be tried as adults, however I also believe they should receive adult sentencings but to a lesser degree, because they are not yet fully developed, they have potential to change, and it is not fair that they are underage but are being tried as adults. As a teen

before they are incarcerated is receiving their sentencing. There is more to a judge handing down a sentence than just giving the convicted person a time limit for how long he has to stay in incarcerated. When it comes to the different ranges of sentencing, there are five goals of contemporary criminal sentencing, the nature of structured sentencing must be understood and its positives explained, and determinate sentencing must be understood. Sentencing is not a cut and dry process. There is a lot that

and incarceration, black men are overrepresented in comparison to Hispanics and whites. Over forty years ago the Civil Rights Act was implemented and racism still continues today due in part to a form of cultural imagery. This structured inequality is evident in the politics of government and all levels of the criminal justice system. The very system that is to be fair has been found to be racially disparate in the treatment of blacks. The causes and existence of this state has been researched

Mr Gaji. Originally the trial was to begin in the ACT Supreme Court in September 2014 however, delays occurred when obtaining the psychiatrist’s report postponing the proceedings. The prosecution further submitted a