Vaccination Argumentative Essay

Mandatory vaccinations have been hotly debated in the United States for over two centuries, making the argument almost as old as the country itself. As early as 1809, Massachusetts became the first state to mandate the world’s premiere vaccine. Authorities recognized the life-saving benefits of the smallpox vaccine. They chose to require inoculation to protect the community from further outbreaks. Public outrage ensued as some community members feared the new vaccine and believed they should be able to choose if they wished to receive it. The most vocal protestors formed anti-compulsory vaccination groups and were successful in getting laws overturned in many states. However, even the United States Supreme Court has upheld states’ rights to require immunization. (A) Vaccinations should be

To Vaccinate or not to vaccinate, has been a question many parents in America have been asking themselves for years. Some parents believe that it is their right to decide if their children will be vaccinated; while some states believe that all children should be vaccinated. There are logical and illogical reasons for this argument. There should be a federal law that requires parents to vaccinate their children because it will lower the number of deaths, benefit those children who have lower immune systems, and it can get rid of some diseases all together in the future.

​Over the past decade, the concern among parents regarding the safety and effectiveness of childhood vaccinations has become a concern in the United States and other countries around the world. A survey of physicians showed that 89% of the physicians who were surveyed reported at least one refusal of childhood vaccinations by parents each month (Gowda & Dempsey, 2013). Other researchers have noted that as many as 77% of parents have concerned about one or more of the childhood vaccinations that are recommended for children (McKee & Bohannon, 2016). However, organizations such as the World Health Organization (2017) note that not only are childhood vaccinations safe, the reduction in children receiving childhood vaccinations has brought back diseases such as measles that had been completely wiped out in the United States. It is clear that there are opposing viewpoints about childhood vaccinations that need to be understood and examined to determine which side has a better argument.

The introduction of vaccinations has been a controversial issue in both developed and developing nations around the world. Despite the benefits of immunizations, some parents refuse to vaccinate their children, which has caused healthcare providers to implement vaccination mandates and intense educational sessions. Is there a middle ground between ensuring the safety of children and preserving parental choice? How can we implement effective methods of communication between vaccine-hesitant parents and healthcare providers without imposing on freedom of choice? Ensuring transparency between vaccine-hesitant parents and health officials aided by resources dependent on a country’s socioeconomic factors can help promote the success of

“Thanks to vaccines, many deadly diseases have become rare in the United States (Vaccination Saves Lives, 2017).” If we stopped administering vaccines we would be putting ourselves and future generations at risk for diseases that have nearly been eradicated. Some people believe that you should be able to choose for yourself on whether or not you want to be vaccinated (Moskowitz, 2015). Choosing not to vaccinate is foolish; under the current law in order to be enrolled in school you must be up to date on all immunizations on the immunization schedule. If the government allowed the choice it would reverse the effects of the last 100 plus years. Illness would once again become an epidemic in our society. Some argue that vaccination is taking away their civil rights to make decisions for themselves. That is not the goal of the vaccination process, the goal is to prevent the return of diseases that were once a major issue in society, but are now miniscule in most developed

Vaccinations are a very commonly debated subject currently. One side refuses to vaccinate their children while the other side vaccinates. It is commonly said by Non-Vaxers that vaccinations are related to autism, have drastic side effects, and they go against religious beliefs. It is also commonly said by Vaxers that vaccines protect the future generations, they save families money, and protect the herd. Both sides make good points, but they have their flaws.

In the last century, vaccinations have become the single most leading achievement in public health because these vaccines have saved millions of lives as well as prevented illness and lifelong disability. These childhood diseases that once resulted in hospitalization, death or lifelong consequences only a few decades ago have now become preventable. If we do not vaccinate against diseases such as RV, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Influenza, Measles, Mumps, and Rubella there could be serious outbreaks. It is my belief that as parents, the goal is to give children a healthy start in life and one of the most important decisions that can be made is to get your child vaccinated, especially since there are no effective alternatives to immunization.

In America, nearly half of the parents refuse to vaccinate their children because of the fears that have been inputted in their head through the media. If the child wishes to attend school, they will need vaccinations against serious diseases like polio, rubella, and mumps. These vaccinations are needed to make sure there is no outbreak of deadly infectious diseases again. In the past decade, as the occurrence of many diseases has fallen drastically as the result of new vaccinations, some American parents have decided to not vaccinate their children, due to the fear of side effects, but there is no scientific evidence to back those theories up. Vaccination rates are declining due to a growing culture of distrust in “big pharma” (1). Not vaccinating

Vaccinations are what doctors and scientists count on to protect lives. So should children keep receiving vaccinations? Vaccines are formed by chemicals designed to create “immunity” for the human body. Doctors use vaccines, because they are known to help protect people from infections. Research done by scientists states that vaccines are safe and effective, but the quality of the actual product may not be what people expect them to be. Therefore, people should have a choice whether to have their children vaccinated or not.

The controversial debate regarding the safety of vaccinations continues to captivate the masses; however we must understand whether the side effects from the vaccine outweigh the risk of the disease it may prevent. There is only one way to prevent the disease cervical cancer, and that is through examination, not vaccination. The vaccination available to aid in prevention of cervical cancer has some effectiveness and in many cases ineffectiveness, in preventing Human Papillomavirus. In essence, the most reliable method of prevention is regular visits with your physician.

Vaccines have always been a controversial topic, to whether they are required all the way down to what they are composed of. It has been an ongoing battle since the 1970s and continues to make headlines even in this year of 2015 with the measles outbreak from Disneyland. Even now, many still believe that vaccinations can cause autism and choose not to vaccinate their children for that reason or another. Vaccinations are critical and need to be required for children before entering public schools.

disease to occur with numerous antigens entering the body at once and that their child will not be able to properly metabolize and excrete the mercury from their body.

The Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the virus responsible for cervical cancer. It is one the most common viral sexually transmitted infections. A vaccine was approved in 2006 that is effective in preventing the types of HPV responsible for 70% of cervical cancers and 90% of genital warts. Proposals for routine and mandatory HPV vaccination of girls have become sources of controversy for parents of school-aged youth, legislators, members of the medical community, and the public at large (Cooper et al. 2010).

The number of individuals who are unvaccinated or infected in the United States has increased (Sun). Vaccines recommended for children are crucial and result in fewer health risks and greater healthy lifestyles. Proponents agree that vaccines are safe and effective, while opponents disagree and believe that vaccines create more negative outcomes than positive ("Should Any Vaccines..."). Opponents attempt to influence and persuade the majority of individuals to stray away from their viewpoints relating to the encouragement of vaccinating children. The rising percentage of children and parents who reject immunization and protest safe vaccines indicate less triumph for sufficient immunization for the population. There are many detrimental risks that affect unvaccinated children, and supporting childhood vaccinations profoundly benefits each parent and child.

During the last ten years or so, there has been a debate on childhood vaccinations. This debate all started from the acquisition that vaccines cause autism. Since the debate, many parents have been skeptical on whether or not they will get their children vaccinated. From the negative comments that are going around from highly respected people new parents doubt vaccines importance to the world. Parents are concerned, which they should be, about if vaccines are beneficial or harmful to their kid’s health? Some claim that vaccinations are needless and unsafe. With the misleading information in parent’s ears they are stuck with the big question. Should I vaccinate my child?