Vagueness In Law Enforcement

3. Both ex post facto laws and the void for vagueness doctrine act are constitutional principles that support the principle of legality. As stated in Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution, under the principle of legality, no individual can be convicted of or punished for a crime unless the law defined the crime and prescribed the punishment before the person engaged in the criminal behavior. Ex post facto laws proactively prevent the criminalization of an act that was considered innocent when

Lyndsey Townsend Ch. 2 Assignment The Rule of Law is the idea that the power of government officials should be defined and limited by laws while Rule of Force related to rules dictated by an authoritative power through intimidation and military backing. Rule of Law allows citizens to understand the powers held in government as well as their individual rights, this promotes equality and mutual understanding between the two parties; it ensures government officials are subject to the same Constitutional

My understanding is when it comes to law enforcement the decision making-style that best describes an action is directive. Directive style decision-making has low acceptance for vagueness. When a law enforcement officer is called to an incident, he or she would order the suspected criminal to stop what they’re doing immediately, that is a directive style decision-making. The criminal has to follow the instruction, and does not need to ask for clarification. Mostly, this order is should an efficient

during the night for some time. Present day, curfew laws are in place for juveniles in many cities, states and countries across the globe. These laws can punish the young person and or their parents or guardian. The laws usually somewhat differ in the fact some include exceptions to certain activities, such as going to and from work or being supervised by a parent or guardian. Case law has even found some of the laws unconstitutional due to vagueness, violation of equal protection, and violation of

the ultimate guide of principles for law creation and enforcement. With that being said, the words of the Constitution are unclear in many respects. Politicians have debates over the Constitution due to the reason that it is difficult to figure out what the Framers meant when they originally wrote the Constitution. According to the Constitution, the Supreme Court has the authority to decide if a law passed by Congress is Constitutional. However, the vagueness of the Constitution allows for the Supreme

abuse, control measures, law enforcement. Police Abuse of Discretion Law enforcement officers face a plethora of dangerous situations day in and day out and make split second decisions with little to no advice. They must exercise due diligence and good judgment when enforcing the law. They face dangerous subjects and conditions that are never the same no matter how routine citizens may think a particular event or call may be. The environment in which law enforcement officers are compelled to

Over the years, cities have embraced new laws to protect citizens against gang criminal acts. Milwaukee and Chicago along with different cities in the country have established loitering and graffiti as gang related acts that can result in future gang involvement or more criminal activity. In 1987 for example, Milwaukee condemned loitering as a gang activity as it could result in the expansion of gang territory or criminal activity. However, such law was later deemed unconstitutional as it failed

hesitancy when approving laws that allow privacy to be breached in the name of national security. Henderson asserts, in the article’s thesis, that The Patriot Act opens the door to the United States Government to breaching the privacy and extraneously surveilling citizens with no connection to terrorism. Moreover, the article maintains that,

adults over the age of 21. Although the Department of Justice under President Obama does not prosecute most individuals and businesses following state and local marijuana laws, both medical and recreational marijuana are technically illegal under federal law. Proposition 64 only made recreational marijuana legal in California state law. The reason for this is because there are both extensive amounts of positive and negative effects of a drug such as this and some states may deem the risks worthy of the

pertaining to the powers of the president demonstrates the inconsistency of the framers of the constitution. This flexibility aspect authorizes the president to effectively execute his law enforcement role. The president plays an influential role in law enforcement by deploying the armed forces to a particular place to enforce law and order. Commander