preview

Victor Frankenstein Moral Analysis

Decent Essays

Victor Frankenstein seemingly goes through several moral pitfalls throughout Mary Shelley’s novel. Between playing God and inviting life to be placed upon a concoction of otherwise left-over body parts, or, completely abandoning the Creature during its first second of life. Is either one morally correct? No. But in my opinion, one is far worse than the other. Frankenstein is equally as defiant of that of a teenager. As soon as he is told not to do something, there is no turning back, and he must then follow through with his plan. For example, when he is told by both his father and more forwardly so by his professor, M. Krempe, that “Every minute, every instant that you have wasted on those books is utterly and entirely lost” after he mentioned his studies of natural philosopher’s Cornelius Agrippa, Albertus Magnus, and Paracelsus, Frankenstein immediately finds another professor who enables his interests and urges him to continue, which he does. However, that all soon spirals out of control and he finds himself in his laboratory day in and day out, obsessively carrying out his experiment, until finally, he sparks life into his new creature. Playing God, when one is in fact a mere human, can never have a good outcome. We as humans have a nasty habit of wanting instant gratification, and in this case, to also prove the naysayers wrong. As human, there is no way for Frankenstein to ever understand every possible outcome that may occur after this creature is brought into the

Get Access