preview

Victoria Chemicals Essay

Decent Essays

Case #22 Victoria Chemicals Synopsis and Objectives go/no-go decision 1. The identification of relevant cash flows; in particular, the treatment of: a. sunk costs b. cash flows obtained by cannibalizing another activity within the firm c. exploitation of excess transportation capacity d. corporate overhead allocations e. cash flows of unrelated projects f. inflation. 2. The critical assessment of a capital-investment evaluation system. 3. The treatment of conflicts of interest and other ethical dilemmas that may arise in investment decisions. Suggested Questions 1. What changes, if any, should Lucy Morris ask Frank Greystock to make …show more content…

The investment requested is £12 million. Strategic and operating benefits were summarized in our previous memo to you. We have made, however, some changes to our investment analyses, which appear below. Two discounted cash flow analyses accompany this memo. Part A contains an adjustment for possible business erosion at Rotterdam, while part B does not make that adjustment. * The results are: Erosion No Erosion NPV £8.8 m £17.1 m IRR 22.3% 31.0% * The costs of the engineering study and corporate overhead allocation have been excluded from the analysis, per discussions with John Camperdown. * Tank-car expenditure occurs earlier in time, and changes in depreciation tax shields are reflected herein. * The discount rate used is 10%, and the cash flows used are nominal, rather than real cash flows. We would be happy to respond to any remaining questions you or the board may have. Executive Summary Being a major competitor in the worldwide chemicals industry Victoria Chemicals is trying to keep up with modern productions. Top managers of Victoria Chemicals are indecisive in

Get Access