preview

Voltaire's Use Of False Optimism In Candide

Decent Essays

Albert Schweltzer, a theologian, organist, philosopher, and physician, once said,”An optimist is a person who sees a green light everywhere, while a pessimist only sees a red stoplight… A truly wise person is colorblind.” Many people know about the dangers of constantly being pessimistic and looking down on people. But what many people do not realize is the dangers of excessive or even blind optimism. Some people swear by it and others think it’s crazy. Voltaire was a famous philosopher who could be said to be ahead of his time, for his beliefs on separation of church and state, freedom of religion, and freedom of expression, and he believed it was insane. He later wrote the novel Candide, which was made as a satire of all the things he believed …show more content…

Blind optimism does harm through rendering those who believe in it unproductive, by making them unable to prosper. This can be seen in Chapter 17 of Candide, where Candide has come to the realization that his constant optimism has done him nothing but harm, and describes the optimism as, “The mania of thinking things are good when they are really quite bad,”(Voltaire 69). At this point Candide becomes quite productive. The fact that the false optimism is what holds him back throughout the novel, is quite prevalent though he eventually is able to break it in this scene. And once he does this, he shows his disgust for the idea by labeling with the negative connotation of being a “mania”. Also, blind optimism creates harm by rendering productivity, by causing those who believe in it to be obsessed with it. This is shown in Chapter 18 of Candide, when Candide is describing the city of El Dorado as ,“[…]the country where all is well; for there absolutely must be one such place,”(Voltaire 71). The city of El Dorado seems perfect to Candide because there is no religion or philosophy, both of which are the main reasons for his obsession over false optimism. Once he realizes that, he learns that all things have not been good the whole adventure, and again is able to become more productive. This shows that once someone breaks the obsessive idea of false optimism, they are able to become more rational and …show more content…

False optimism, based off the argument of religion, is flawed because it causes people to create excuses. The argument for false optimism based off religion is depicted in “The Worst of All Possible Worlds” where it reads,”The overly optimistic views of these philosophers are based off the religious views they have,”(Morassutti 1). Although it is not right to argue and say one religion is wrong, it is justified to say that religions can be taken too far. The belief that everything that happens is good takes religion too far, because it just causes excuses to be made. People do not have to take responsibility for their actions, because they are all good in their mind. Or no matter how bad their actions are they can still be depicted as good to themselves, through the already mentioned delusion cause by false positivity towards everything. Furthermore, the argument that fake optimism allows people to overcome character flaws is false because it really is just a mask for them. The argument for fraudulent optimism helping people get past personal or characteristic problems is brought up in “For The Gipper”, where it states,”It’s not a virtue but a temperament, and liberal pragmatists from John Dewey to Richard Rorty for years have tried to reduce all philosophical disagreements to matters of temperament,”(Kesler 1). The fact

Get Access