preview

Wealth Gap In America

Good Essays

Income inequality is the unspoken truth of American life. Millions of Americans live in poverty while the minority holds the majority of the wealth. This problem has become more severe in recent years, with the wealth gap increasing exponentially. While innovation drives economics in the free market, recent innovations have caused the wealth gap to become skewed. Broadband Internet is one particular innovation that has spurred economic growth but has hurt the lower class. Broadband Internet can be defined as “768 Kbps download and 200 Kbps upload” (Dunbar). Although there are many varying classification of broadband Internet, this definition will be utilized for the purposes of this paper. The non-adoption of broadband Internet by those living …show more content…

This wealth gap has become increasingly large in recent years. “The richest 20 percent of Americans hold nearly 85 percent of the total household wealth in the country” (Mantsios 284). The wealth gap has been growing at a faster rate in recent years, since about 1995. “Edward Wolff found that wealth inequality actually leveled off from 1989 to 1995, a slow growth period, after rising steeply between 1983 and 1989, a fast growing period” (Zhu). The wealth gap had stopped growing prior to 1995 and had been leveling off for about 6 years. This period of slow growth stopped in 1995 though. “89 percent of the total net growth from 1995 to 2004 took place among the wealthiest households” (Harvard). So, while the wealth gap had started to stagnate in in 1989 it began growing at an incredibly fast rate in 1995. Almost 90 percent of the entire wealth gain went to the upper class after 1995. This fast growth rate was a result of the introduction of broadband Internet and the digital …show more content…

The chance that someone will adopt broadband Internet is directly related to their income. For example, those that earn $25,000 are 35.8 percent likely to adopt broadband as opposed to those that make more than $100,000 who are 94.1 percent likely to adopt broadband (United States). These statistics show that those living on low-income are unlikely to adopt broadband Internet. The adoption of broadband can also be directly traced to other economic figures including the average income of states. One example, “Arkansas ranked 49th with a 43 percent subscribership rate. The state ranks 50th in median annual income, at $38,600” (Dunbar). As opposed to “Connecticut which is second in broadband at 72 percent, and second in income at $65,958” (Dunbar). Those states with low broadband adoption rates are also the ones with the lower incomes. This shows a clear link between income and broadband adoption. One final example will show the link between adoption and poverty within a city. The Bridgeport MSA is the most connected in America but it is also first in unequal distribution of wealth. “Wealthier households subscribe at a rate of 80 percent to 100 percent, while low-income areas of the city, some exceeding a 50 percent poverty rate, subscribe at a rate of 40 percent to 60 percent” (Dunbar). So, income and broadband adoption are closely related throughout the country. The

Get Access