Welfare Drug Testing Research Paper

As with all political issues, there are those on the other side of the fence. People oppose this legistlation for various reasons: from constitutionality to cost. According to a study done by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), welfare recipients are no more likely to use drugs. Furthermore, placing a requirement to be tested may place a stigma upon those receiving welfare which would be counterproductive to their relief (Drug Testing). An editorial by Henry Waters in the Columbia Daily Tribune, the bill is the government attempting to punish a class of people who are presumed worthless (Waters). Another reason people oppose this legislation is the cost. The ACLU study reports the average cost of a drug test at $42 per person. There are less invasive and cheaper methods to

Is it fair that in order to obtain a job, some people go through drug testing while drug and alcohol abusers receive free, no strings attached, financial assistance (see appendix A)? Food stamps and Medicaid are provided to low and no income Americans who would otherwise do without. According to heritage.org, a majority of the illegal drug use in American adults is tied to unemployed citizens. While there are many people who disagree with testing welfare recipients, the truth is that the pros greatly outweigh the cons. The long term improvements that drug testing will have on the country are substantial. The wellbeing and stability of America’s children, unemployment, fairness across the board for all Americans and the economy; all play

To test or not to test has been has been the question at hand for many states that are dealing with whether or not to pass the law that welfare recipients should or should not be drug tested in order to receive assistance from the government. Florida was the first state to mandate the law in 2011 and thereafter twenty four other states in the last year have also passed this law with our own state of Oklahoma being one of them. Although alcohol is legal it is abused far more than marijuana or hard core drugs, According to the 1996 study by the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism the differences between the proportion of welfare and non-welfare recipients using illegal drugs are statistically insignificant. Although some states have decided to pass the law for welfare recipients in order receive government assistance, I believe it’s ineffective to drug test these welfare recipients in order to receive their benefits. Welfare in the United States commonly refers to the federal government welfare programs that have been put in place to assist the unemployed or underemployed. Help is extended to the poor through a variety of government welfare programs that include the Women, Infants, and Children Program which is referred to as WIC, Medicaid, and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families commonly known as TANF and Aid to Families with Dependent Children.

In 2010, 17.5% of unemployed adults collecting some sort of welfare failed drug tests. In 2011, 23.8% of welfare recipients admitted to using illegal drugs, including marijuana. The problem the United States if facing is that welfare recipients are using the cash they are given to purchase illegal drugs. Many of these people purchasing illegal drugs had prior illegal drug abuse problems and some of these people believe that since they are given this “free” money, they can continue on with these addictions instead of finding the help they need to get back onto their own two feet. Many employers ask all of their job applicants for a drug test to even be considered for the job, so why shouldn’t the government ask the same for people looking

“A closed mouth doesn’t get fed” is a saying that many people have heard throughout life. This saying was brought about to encourage people to ask for help if needed. But what happens when the open mouth asked to be fed, and instead of receiving help they are forced to be demeaned by going through a rigorous process that assumes that all applicants fall in to the category of drug addicts? Guilty until proven innocent is the message conveyed to persons requesting these services. Millions of dollars are spent each year on federally funded programs that are considered “welfare”. The types of services these programs offer include TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families), SNAP

Drug Testing Welfare Recipients To test or not to test has been has been the question at hand for many states that are dealing with whether or not to pass the law that welfare recipients should or should not be drug tested in order to receive assistance from the government. Florida was the first state to mandate the law in 2011 and thereafter twenty four other states in the last year have also passed this law in our own state of Oklahoma being one of them. Although alcohol is legal it is abused far more than marijuana or hard core drugs, According to the 1996 study by the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism the differences between the proportion of welfare and non-welfare recipients using illegal drugs are statistically insignificant. Although some states have decided to pass the law for welfare recipients in order receive government assistance, I believe it’s ineffective to drug test these welfare recipients in order to receive their benefits. Welfare in the United States commonly refers to the federal government welfare programs that have been put in place to assist the unemployed or underemployed. Help is extended to the poor through a variety of government welfare programs that include the Women, Infants, and Children Program, which is referred to as WIC, Medicaid, and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families commonly known as TANF and Aid to Families with Dependent Children. Drug testing welfare recipients is negative because drug tests performed on welfare

The process of drug testing individuals who are applying or receiving welfare benefits has recently become the focus of a widely spread controversy. Florida, the first state to pass the law, now requires all individuals applying for public assistance to undergo drug testing. The state of Kentucky, among others, have considered following this trend. State lawmakers hope to prevent the squandering of taxpayer dollars on drugs by proposing similar guidelines. Alabama’s states representative Kerry Rich clearly affirmed his state’s position on the matter, “I don’t think the taxpayers should have to help fund somebody’s drug habit” (qtd. in Time).

Over the past few years, there has been a lot of controversy over whether or not those who test positive for drugs should be able to receive welfare. It was an argument that flooded social media, arguments filling comments with opinions. It is a subject that continues to be discussed within our peer groups, our communities, and our states. This paper will discuss the opinions of individual’s within the country, the beneficial factors of drug testing welfare recipients as well as the unbeneficial factors, as well as who decides if drug testing welfare recipients goes into effect or not.

In this article, author William Judge states that United States senator Orrin Hatch proposed an amendment to a jobs bill that also included a requirement for states to drug test those receiving temporary government assistance. The proposal received a great amount of backlash because it failed to include a defined plan to treat the recipients that test positive for substance abuse. Judge elaborates that, drug abuse is an issue in the welfare system but the proposed amendment does not provide enough structure to change current laws and implement drug testing. The lack of structure discourages taxpayers from supporting the bill be the unknown amount of testing and treatment services could be costly. Judge believes that drug testing would result in a constitutional legal battle that would outweigh the government’s interest in the drug abuse problem. Evaluation: This article is primarily informative and the author only offers his opinion on the subject after all of the facts have been introduced. Judge provides a perspective on both sides of the proposed amendment, while giving useful background information. He shows that he critically analyzed the amendment by elaborating

While it is true that there are some jobs that do require a drug test prior to employment, the employees have a choice in the matter. If they do not wish to take a drug test, or if they fail the test, they can choose to find another job. However, by making it mandatory that welfare recipients be drug tested, they do not have a choice. If welfare recipients fail a drug test or refuse to take it, they don’t have the option to find another government to get the assistance that they need. Most welfare recipients are in need of public assistance due to situations that they cannot control. For example, if a single mother of three kids gets laid off due to the harsh economy, at some point, she has no other choice but to ask for help. Eventually, she may have to utilize public assistance that the government has put in place such as food stamps, Medicaid, or welfare. If the government makes drug testing mandatory, the single mother of three has only one choice to make—do whatever the government requires to feed

United States lawmakers face one of the most pressing issues of our time-welfare reform. New screening processes, often considered a direct violation of constitutional rights, have already been enacted in many states. Strong evidence exists, asserting that the practice of administering drug testing to welfare recipients will cost the U.S. taxpayers more money in the long run, stigmatize applicants and participants, and serve only the purpose of making the pharmaceutical companies more powerful. In order to protect the constitutional rights of potential welfare recipients, United States lawmakers should avoid further criminalizing the poor by submitting them to drug testing and/or a nationwide welfare registry.

Waking up at 4:00am is hard to do. Especially if you’re getting paid 8.00 dollars an hour, and have to provide for another 6 people. When it that time of the month, the one you’ve been saving for, all those bills you need to pay. If you’re lucky you could have a couple of dollars saved up. Now you see your neighbors with their 2 daughters getting a 1,500 dollar check, when all they do is lay down in their bedrooms and smoke some type of drug. Wouldn’t it make you angry? When you’re having to wake up at 4:00am and working all day, but your neighbors stay home and do nothing. Even though those on welfare may be exploited, welfare drug testing should be allowed because welfare can be used for helping people and welfare can be used for actual needs.

d. Kalynn Amundson spoke about the topic of drug testing welfare recipients from its very beginning. She gave an insight into the topic from a sociological standpoint. She began by stating, “The worthiness of welfare recipients has long been questioned. However, their stereotypic depictions have changed throughout the decades.” (Amundson, 2015)

Law makers believe drug testing welfare recipients is an effective use of tax payers dollars. Advocates believe drug testing will ensure welfare benefits will be used properly on things such as housing and other necessities instead of drugs. Mandatory drug testing will help identify individuals who can benefit from drug treatment. They can receive help and tax payers save money in the long run. For drug testing to be effective only individuals suspicious of drug activity will be tested. Members of legislative argue drug testing is required by employers, it is reasonable to drug test welfare assistance. Adding more requirements will encourage individuals to avoid paperwork and hassle.

Drug test is a test created in order to determine if one uses or has been using any form of a non-prescribed drugs. The test can be verified in various ways. Drug testing is a common requirement held for one who is seeking future employment with a specific company. The test is also used for various businesses, private groups, and organizations. Using illegal drugs can have many bad consequences and cannot just cause serious trouble for the person using them but for the company as well. One factor that shows how it can be pointless of having to drug test one who is on welfare is because how much it costs. Issuing out drug test to people on welfare can be an expensive thing especially if the person who is drug tested test ends up coming back negative. When that happens one can say that the testing is a waste of both time and especially money. For years most people believed that being able to drug test people who need financial