In 1994 the president of Rwanda, Habyarimana, was murdered. His plane was shot down unexpectedly. Although there are no facts to prove who had caused this catastrophe, the Hutu strongly convinced themselves the Tutsi were at fault. Consequently, these assumptions sparked an appalling mass killing in the country of Rwanda; the Rwandan Genocide. By the end of this inhuman, cruel, and unjust war, 800,000 people were deceased (the majority Tutsi). There is an argument regarding the amount of casualties: if the Tutsis would have had assistance from other countries the number of causalities may have been reduced. In fact, there is a lot of questioning concerning the role of the United Nations during this time; did they contribute enough? Could they …show more content…
The Hutu (the ethnic majority of Rwanda) and the Tutsi (the minority making up 14% percent of Rwanda) sometimes looked indistinguishable yet had always been viewed otherwise. Many believe the division between the Hutu and Tutsi first started After World War I (when Belgium gained control over Rwanda.) Some people assumed the Belgians initially caused the division between the two ethnicities since they strongly favored the Tutsi and treated them superior to the Hutu. Belgium had merely enhanced the segregation between the groups: “Belgium [even] instituted apartheid-like identity cards” in order to separate the cultures (Steven, 2006). The disunion of the two tribes really began all the way back to the 14th century, when the Tutsi migrated from the southern Ethiopian highlands into Rwanda. Although the Hutu had continually outnumbered the Tutsi (by 85%) the Tutsi always had the advantage. The Cushite, later known as Tutsi, were originally said to be taller, lighter skinned, and more “cultured” right from the get go. They used their talents such as driving cattle and combat in order to gain economic and political supremacy. (Modern History Project, 2012) In addition to their useful skills, the Tutsi also grasped control of Rwanda when King Ruganzu Ndori inherited the throne after his father, Nsoro (former King) passed away around the 16th …show more content…
This is a universal way of thinking simply because those two methods exterminate large groups of individuals quickly. An astonishing element of the Rwandan Genocide is that the majority of Hutus annihilated the Tutsi with machetes (knives usually used to hack at weeds). Why didn’t the United Nations see this as an advantage? The Hutu were not all armed with firearms, most were killing thousands with garden tools (Power, 2001 ). The United Nations could have utilized their resources and defended the innocent with higher-level
The UN had failed to resolve conflict in Rwanda there is still some little minor conflict going on in Rwanda this day. The UN had put up some camps for the tutsis and helped alittle for people to seek shelter and safety. The hutus knew that the UN could not do anything physical because they are primarily peacekeepers and trying to resolve the problem so the hutus was still killing everyone so nothing was resolved.
Throughout the 20th century, numerous acts of genocides have attempted to bring the complete elimination and devastation of large groups of people originating from various particular ethnicities. With these genocides occurring in many regions of the world, the perpetrators often organizing such crimes, have historically been larger and more powerful than the victims themselves. Often being the government and its military forces. However, the lack of international response associated with these genocides, further contributed to the devastating outcomes. On April 6,1994, the fastest killing spree of the century took place in Rwanda against the Tutsi minority population. With many warning signs having already been proclaimed prior to the start of the Rwandan genocide, I believe that with international interference, this bloodshed could have ultimately been prevented.
The United Nations failed Rwanda, in a time of need they abandoned the Rwandan people giving them no physical protection. Sadly, things go wrong with the slaughter of almost 800,000 Rwanda people, left defenseless in a country where no one outside cared. U.N. troops were present as only “peace-keepers.” The dispute was between the Hutus and Tutsis people could of been controlled if the U.N. changed their position, but the result could bring more consequences. This conflict between the two social groups in Rwanda,was left to be resolved on its own with many lives lost.
The UN and the US government are accredited for deploring conflict situations as well as contributing humanitarian aid, and this is what these two organizations did in Rwanda and Darfur. However, the UN did not do anything to punish or prevent the genocides that took place in these two countries. The US government promised to support the peace talk’s agreement in Darfur and hold the perpetrators accountable for their acts. It never kept that promise since nothing has been done. So far, the UN’s Security Council has also failed in its peace keeping mission effeorts, and is instead pressuring Sudan with words only. No solid steps have been made to bring the wrong doers into justice (Shapiro).
The Tutsi tribe was historically seen as the ruling class of Rwanda while Hutu were considered farmer folk. Following World War I the Belgians were authoritarian rulers in the region, fueling further disputes between the Hutu
With over eight hundred thousand to one million deaths, the Rwandan genocide is undoubtedly one of the most sad and shocking examples of the lack of intervention by not only the US and the UN, but by other countries as well. The ongoing tensions between the Hutu, the largest population in Rwanda, and the Tutsi, the smaller and more elite population is what eventually lead to the Rwandan genocide. The killings began quickly after President Habyarimana 's plane was shot down. After hundreds of thousands of deaths, the US did not intervene in Rwanda because being a landlocked country with no natural resources to benefit the US, there was no economical benefit, and the risk of sending in troops simply outweighed the rewards. The aftermath of the genocide has not only impacted those who lived through it, but it has also impacted future generations as well. At the end of the genocide, the ICTR was formed by the UN to find justice. The Rwandan genocide has shocking similarities between the Holocaust and the Armenian Genocide as well. Overall, the Rwandan genocide was a terrible event that escalated far beyond what it should have if there had been intervention from other countries and the UN.
When Belgium took control of Rwanda in 1916 the Hutu’s and the Tutsi’s had a slight differentiation of the ethnic groups, the Hutu’s were farmers and the Tutsi’s were cattle herders. Though they both spoke the same language and had similar traditions. The Tutsi were seen as a higher class of people, only because it took more money to buy cattle, but it was possible to have upward movement in society through changes in jobs or through intermarriage (Jones).
Nevertheless, they failed to prevent this ridiculous genocide because of their lack of attempt and lack of effort to stop it. On the fourteenth-anniversary of the genocide, the UN’s thoughts go out to the victims who have been traumatized, hurt, or dead during Rwanda’s Genocide. Quote UN secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon’s message “It is often those who most need their rights protected, who also need to be informed that the Declaration exists -- and that it exists for them.”- This message was a little too late after hundreds of thousands of people have been brutally massacred in the genocide in Rwanda. Though the UN seemed to have convinced the people in Rwanda that they were doing their best to stop this, nevertheless, the UN is respectively responsible for their inability to keep peace among the ethnic tribes (Hutus and Tutsis). (M2PressWIRE, 2008)
One particular case that has been studied recently is the Rwandan Genocide that occurred in 1994. The Rwandan Genocide remains one of the fastest and most brutal cases of genocide in modern history (Temitope and Danjibo 2013). In the years leading up to the genocide there was a civil war between the Government of Rwanda (led by Hutu General Habyarimana) and the Tutsi expat group, the Rwandan Patriotic Front, who had been in exile in Uganda (Buhr 2015). Following the cease-fire agreement in 1993, there were signs that the agreement would not hold despite the presence of UN peacekeepers (Buhr 2015). In April 1994 General Habyarimana was assassinated, and violence ensued (Buhr 2015). Tutsis were blamed for the death of Habyarimana, despite a lack of evidence (Buhr 2015). From April to July of 1994 vengeful Hutus slaughtered approximately one million Tutsis (Temitope and Danjibo 2013).
Before the genocide, Rwanda was a colony of Belgium. When the Belgian explorers arrived, they split the people by their physical features. These features include the size of your nose, your skin tone, and even your height. Being a Tutsi ment you closer resembled a European with a smaller nose and brighter skin color. This division later on showed that the Belgians favored the Tutsi more than the Hutu. The Hutu took up 90% of the population followed by the Tutsis 9% and the last 1% goes to erelevant groups of the genocide, such as the Twa. But how did the tensions rise between the groups?
The UN was sent to monitor this peace agreement. Although in 1994 Habyarimana and the Burundian president, both being Hutu’s, were killed after their plane was shot down. Hutu extremists, Militias, blamed the RPF, and immediately started a well-organised campaign of slaughter. The RPF said the plane had been shot down by Hutus to provide an excuse for the genocide. The 1994 genocide, killed around 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus in just 100 days. Militias went out to kill people, they set up roadblocks and used ID cards to identify Tutsi’s which they slaughtered. Neighbours killed neighbours and some husbands even killed their Tutsi wives. Around 2 million Hutu refugees fled from RPF controlled areas to refugee camps in Burundi, Zaire and Tanzania. The Rwandan Genocide is said to be the most efficient, high-speed, low-tech mass killing the world had ever
The Rwandan president, Habyarimana and the president of Burundi, Cyprien Ntaryamira, are killed when the president’s plane is shot down near Kigali Airport, on April 6th, 1994. That night on the 6th of April, 1994, the genocide begins. Hutu people take to the streets with guns and machetes. The Hutus set up roadblocks and stopped anyone that looked Tutsi or suspected of helping Tutsi people to hide. On April 7th, 1994 the Rwandan Armed Forces set up roadblocks and went house to house to kill any Tutsis found. Thousands of people die on the first, while the U.N. just stands by and watches the slaughter go on. On April 8th, 1994 the U.N. cuts its forces from 2,500 to 250 after ten U.N. soldiers were disarmed and tortured and shot or hacked to death by machetes, trying to protect the Prime Minister. As the slaughter continues the U.N. sends 6,800 soldiers to Rwanda to protect the civilians, on May 17th, 1994, they were meant to be the peacekeepers. The slaughter continues until July 15th, 1994, in the 100 days that the genocide lasted 800,000-1,000,000 Tutsis and Hutus
Beginning April of 2004, the Rwandan Hutu started mass murders of Tutsi. This genocide is believed to have spawned from the civil war that was taking place at that time. This civil war was based on issues over power and resentment between the Tutsi and the Hutu. (Rwanda, 2008) Eventually the war escalated to the point where the Hutu began genocide of the Tutsi and anybody who opposed the ideas of the Hutu. The killing of the Tutsis became so common—in a very short amount of time—that it was practically acceptable amongst the Rwandans. (Hintjens, 1999) This was a very brutal and gruesome genocide. In just five weeks, approximately half a million Tutsi and innocent civilians had been murdered. (Hintjens, 1999) This is an astounding number of people, especially because the Hutu murdered the Tutsi at knife point—usually with a machete. (Snow, 2008)
Prior to colonial era, Rwanda had larger population of Hutus compared to Tutsis and Twa. Rwanda as a country was divided into three ethnic groups i.e. Hutu (approximately about 85%), Tutsi (14%) and Twa (1%) (United Nations). Although, Tutsis were the minorities, they belonged to the higher strata compared to the other ethnic groups; Tutsis were privileged and had power and control over the Hutus and Twas. “Hutus were formerly bound to their Tutsi patrons via client ship” (Sinema, 2012). When Rwanda was colonized by Germany followed by Belgium, they favored Tutsis as they represented the upper class prior to the colonization. These created a social system like feudal system where there was a power difference between the Hutus and the Tutsis. Tutsis were considered as lord and the Hutus on the other hand, were considered as peasants. As a consequence, this created an ethic tension between the Hutus and the Tutsis and created a system more like apartheid. Nonetheless, they managed to co exist in Rwanda until they were decolonized. Although there is no social distinction between the Hutus and the Tutsis, the conflict between these tribes increased tremendously after the independence from Belgian that led to mass murder and ethnic cleansing of the Tutsi by the Hutu.
Rwanda is made of 3 ethnic groups which are the Hutu (85% of population), the Tutsi (14%) and the Twa (1%). During colonisation the minority Tutsi were typically considered the elite because they had much lighter skin compared to the Hutu this created division between the Rwandan populations because they ruled the country during colonisation. When Rwanda gained independence in 1962, the Hutus thought that the Tutsi people were to blame for the increasing social and economic problems that the country was facing and they were angry at the Tutsi. This was one of the long term causes of the Rwandan genocide.