What Is The Darnell's Case

The purpose of this report is to discuss the matter The Queen V Bayley, which took place on the 29th of September 2012. Adrian bailey (serial rapist) was found guilty on charges of murder and rape, this report will discuss in detail the court proceedings that lead up to the imprisonment of Adrian Bayley and also the events prior to the kidnapping of Jill Meagher. The purpose of this report is to discuss the purpose of law in our society and how it applies to people who commit crimes in our community. As well as the purpose of criminal law in our community.

The over taxation was caused by the the vast amounts of debt that the British Monarchy had due to the French and Indian War. The British Parliament thought that they had the right to tax only the colonies and not Britain. This angered the colonies and caused them to rebel in small ways. This also led to them protesting the fact that they had no representation in Parliament. The war costed almost 70,000,000 euros and doubled Britain's national debt to 140,000,000 euros. They in turn increased the taxes on the colonies.

The Writ of Habeas Corpus states that “the Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion, the public safety may require it" (U.S. Constitution. Art. I, Sec. 9). In simpler terms, this means that the government, or its officials, is forbidden to arrest a citizen without allowing the case to be presented to a judge or court. The dictionary defines a writ as "a form of written command in the name of a court or other legal authority." Since the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215, Habeas Corpus has been a pillar of law in America ("FAQs: What Is Habeas Corpus."). It

HOLDING: The defendant King made the statements when he was in custody so therefore the investigation was no longer a general inquiry into an unsolved crime, it was centered upon him violating the Criminal law which made an effect on the both defendants’ convictions.

Due to the French and Indian War, Britain had massive debt to pay off. To help pay these debts, they enabled acts on the colonies which taxed very common and everyday goods, such as tea. (Document B). When the colonists rebelled against the taxes, King George decided to pass a series of acts, one of which being the Quartering Act. The Quartering Act forced colonists to house British soldiers, and to provide supplies for them that some colonists could not afford.

King George the III and Parliament decided to make British Colonies pay for the war debt from the French and Indian War or also known as the Seven Year War.The taxes were paid on a printed material.

The court cases for Wilkes v. Wood and Entick v. Carrington were tried in England. Charles Pratt, and 1st Earl Camden came to the lawful conclusion that a search carried out by the defendant in the name of the king was prohibited. The general warrant authorized the seizure of the Plaintiff 's papers but not specific ones, and that the warrant lacked probable cause. This case became the precedent upon which all other criminal and civil cases under common law are determined (Search and Seizure- The Fourth Amendment: Origins, Text, And History, 2014). The third case that was tried dealt with Writs of Assistance. British customs inspectors seeking to eliminate smuggling in colonial Boston were given unrestricted search warrants, called writs of assistance. This allowed them to search any place where they suspected that smuggled goods existed. These writs, furthermore, permitted inspectors to force private citizens to help them carry out the searches. Some Boston merchants, represented by James Otis, sued, seeking that the writs were invalid. Although he merchants lost the case, Otis 's argument became famous and strengthened

Earlier, he would pass these expenses as taxes, but later the parliament didn’t allow him. b. Quartering Act: Parliament passed the Quartering Act in 1765. It was a cost-saving measure that required the colonies to house, British soldiers and provide them with supplies. General Thomas Gage, commander of these forces, put most of the troops

This was a against Britain and France that the colonies originally fought, and Britain decided to send troops to help the colonies. After the war Britain was deep in debt. Instead of taxing the residents of Britain, he taxed the colonies heavily. They felt like the King was being unfair, and that they shouldn’t have to pay for the war because they did most of the fighting. This started more rebellions around the colonies. This argument was going throughout Britain citizens and the colonies. Both sides felt like the other should pay for the war and they should not spend any money on the war. To sum it all up, the King taxing them even more because of the war led them even closer to another

“…the revenue arising is very small and inconsiderable… and is not sufficient” (Doc F). The hard-won victory in the French and Indian War cost the British millions of pounds and created an enormous war debt. England’s burden of debt nearly doubled since 1754, from 73 million pounds to 137 million pounds. After considering their hardships, England felt it only right

When the attorneys told the judge of the appeal, he told them to return the next day to file it, but it was denied by the judge the next day, saying it was filed a day too late (“Shipp”). A writ of error was filed by Parden, and he asked the Tennessee Supreme Court to postpone Johnson’s execution, but they declined (“Shipp”). On March 7, Parden filed a writ of habeas corpus in the federal district court, declaring that Johnson had been denied certain rights protected by the constitution, including due process and fair trial (Pfeifer, “Historic”; “Shipp”). At the federal district court hearing, the judge stated that the right to a fair trial stated in the 6th amendment didn’t apply to state trials, but the judge did move

Now that the Seven Years’ War is over the Royal Crown is in debt. After the war Prime Minister, John Stuart, 3rd Earl of Bute, decided to keep 10,000 British Soldiers in the colonies which would cost £225,000 a year. One of the reasons of why the Prime Minister would do this is that demobilizing the troops would put 1,500 soldiers out of a job, it is believed some of these soldiers have ties into parliament. The national debt went from £72,289,673 in 1756 to

The distinctive body of law which is now referred to as tort arouse in the 1580’s with the first usage of the word ‘tort’ in a legal context. The general creation of ‘tort’ in a court of law was made to allow a party that has suffered harm due to the inactions or actions caused by an opposing party to impeach legal liability to the opposing party or to allow the accused party the right to defend their liability of such harms. The primary purpose of tort law Is to redress imbalances which has led to harm caused by another party this allows aggrieved parties to have the right and freedom to seek compensation for such damages as a court of law sees fit. Tort has a large distinction from other areas of law as crimes are punishable by the state, whereas as for a tort has specific consequences and allows the injured person or party the right to action. Tort’s largest outlying factor which differentiate from other areas of the law is the fact that for other areas of the law the case will classify the pursuant to their seriousness and in regards to tort this would not be the case due to the case will be decided in regards to a party’s legal liability and that the injured party receives right and just compensation for their losses.

The outcome of the trial of Charles was unfairly determined due to the disdain with certain judicial proceedings and the trial altogether by nobility and members of the court. When the House of Commons began its assault on Charles, “it was widely argued... in the highest civilian and military

The issue before the court is whether or not the respondent should be tried even though