Who's For The Game Pope Analysis

His use of descriptive imagery is used in an attempt to shake the reader and alert them that war is not a pretty patriotic celebration of one’s country, it is the death of millions. Just before that line, Fearing describes how wonderful the “profession” of the military. “Wanted: Men; Millions of men are wanted at once in a big new field: New, tremendous, thrilling, great.” (896). This describes the glorification of war across the world, especially in the United States.

“They” talks about how the soldiers are going into war and are being provoked by the disasters that are happening around them. “Dulce Et Decorum Est”, on the other hand, describes how a soldier is watching his friend die because he could not get his protective mask on. These two poems play off one another, because “They” is talking about how war is changing soldiers, and “Dulce Et Decorum Est” is giving a clear example of how war is changing the soldiers.

‘Who’s for the Game?’ is a poem through which Jessie Pope’s war representation encapsulates the opinion of her culture: that war was fun, jovial and glorious that young person could earn if only he had the courage. Jessie Pope’s use of rhetorical questions influences the reader to enlist, otherwise they feel weak and cowardly like when she says, “Who wants a turn to himself in the show?” and “Who wants a seat in the stand?” Everyone wants to be brave and courageous so Pope’s use of rhetorical questions really influences the reader to truly consider enlisting.

The poem was written to show that war is a waste of human life as the soldier knows he will die one day as well as the men around him, just some quicker than others. This can be evident in stanza four of the poem: “I know I’ll join them somewhere, one day.” The language used is more casual than formative, this is effective as it shows the personal feelings and thoughts of the soldier during the time

Analysing Willfred Owen's Dulce Et Decorum Est. ‘Dulce ET Decorum Est’ is an anti-war poem, which emphasizes the intensity of war. The meaning of the ironic title roughly translated into ‘it is good and honourable’ but is not fully established until you examine the poem. The full title ‘Dulce ET Decorum Est Pro Patria Mori’ means ‘it is good and honourable to die for your country’.

In the poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen, it is very tragic and full of anti-war thoughts. In “Who’s for the Game?” by Jessie Pope, the author is pro-war because she talks about feeling the rush in war. The poems are very different from each other and both have a lot of good points. The mood and tone are very different and the author's ideas differ. They are both going to give you a different side on the war, weather you should or shouldn't go to war.

Both works express a sense of “call to action” which is why both authors’ mannerism is very intense and fierce, which communicates the tone of urgency to the audience. In “To His Army Before His Defeat in Battle” Catiline says, “When I contemplate you, soldiers, and when I consider your past exploits, a strong hope of victory animates me. Your spirit, your age, your valor, give me confidence…which makes even cowards brave” His ambition to innovate his audience is clear, creating a coherent tone among the poem. In “Message to Invasion Troops” General Eisenhower states, “The tide has turned! The free men of the world are marching together to victory! I have full confidence in your courage, devotion to duty and skill in battle. We will accept nothing less than full victory!” These two quotes create a distinct tone, which is common to both speeches; it establishes the significance in supporting and protecting your country. The tone, which is one of urgency, ambition and power, is made clear throughout each work, and is persuasive to the

First and for most, when we examine the piece "Who's for the Game", one can immediately sense that the author's approach to war will be jovial, inviting, and supportive. This is confirmed in the first line of the piece when the author states "Who's for the game, the biggest that's played,". The effect that the rhetorical opening has on the reader is that it draws in attention and sparks curiosity. In addition, this upbeat, engaging attitude is also reflected through the multiple metaphors that the authors uses. For instance, the author compares war to football by saying "Who'll grip and tackle the job unafraid?", and "Who'll toe the line for the signal to 'Go!'". It is

Since the emergence of written history, many fables regarding war have encompassed a significant portion of prosodic literature. Two of the foremost war poets of the 19th and 20th century—Emily Dickinson and Rupert Brooke—have both written about profound implications of war on society and also upon the human spirit albeit in two very different styles. The book, Catcher in the Rye by J.D Salinger, theorizes through Allie, that Emily Dickinson was indubitably the superior war poet. Furthermore, when we analyze their works as well, we realize the invariable fact that Dickinson’s work delves into war with a much more holistic approach as well. She not only honours the soldiers for their valiant efforts, but also deftly weaves notions of liberty and civilian duty in regards to war as well as compared to Rupert Brooke who carried a romanticized imagery of martyrs within his poetry. In summation, Emily Dickinson is a superior war poet for her incisive analysis of death, and human nature in correspondence to war as compared to the patriotic salvos of Rupert Brooke’s poetry.

The poems I have chosen to compare in this essay are Wilfred Owen's “Dulce Et Decorum Est” and Jessie Pope's “Who's For The Game?”. The two poems I have chosen to compare are both about the first world war. Yet the two poems have very different opinions on the Great War. My first poem, Dulce et decorum, is against the war and the injustice of it all. It is narrated by one of the soldiers who is fighting in the Great War and having to face the horrors of war. On the contrary my second poem, Who's for the game, is a recruitment poem.

It is intended to inform readers of the real outcomes of war, and how they effect the soldiers that fight in them. The last lines grab the readers' attentions,

Conversely, Pope adopts a colloquial, sing-song-like tone in an effort to inaccurately characterize war as simple and effortless. Her application of the word “laddie” throughout her poem The Call communicates the informal and conversational presentation of the topic, for the word is often used in everyday, casual settings. Such a careful choice of language demonstrates her subtle downplay of the seriousness of war, for choosing to converse in such an informal manner when discussing a subject of this magnitude highlights her intention to equate war to the everyday connotation of her word choice. In addition, it allows her to appeal to her audience on a personal level. Rather than merely posing questions to her audience every other line, Pope chooses to address them personally with the inclusion of “my laddie”. Perhaps this intimate acknowledgment contributed to her poem’s success in persuading men to enlist. Likewise, the entirety of The Call exhibits her deliberate illustration of war as a sport or game, specifically in lines such as, “Who longs to charge and shoot” and “Who’s keen on getting fit” (Pope 11,13). These understated comparisons accentuate her sing-song-like tone, for they are consistently followed by rhetorical questions that challenge a reader’s loyalty and commitment. This rhythm Pope develops in The Call results in a forced steady read, much like that of nursery rhymes. Although indistinct, the rhythmic similarities between nursery rhymes and The Call

With no hesitation, he willing drops everything he has and goes to war. He tells his lover that he has to go do this, and that he will love no one more than he loves the enemies on the battlefield. Lovelace’s description of how the character does not worry about dying for his country allows the reader to see how much war meant to people during this time. In the poem Dulce et Decorum Est, Wilfred Owen allows the reader to read about a tragic situation in which the soldiers are dying from gas and drowning in their own blood. Owen shows the reader that fighting for one’s country was the heroic thing to do in World War I. Unlike Lovelace, Owen ends the poem by stepping back from describing the war.

The poems “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen and “Who’s for the Game?” by Jessie Pope are direct antitheses of each other, such that their views about war, the chosen literary schemes, and the effects on the readers are exact opposites in each view. “Who’s for the Game?” is a strong pro-war poem with a simplistic rhyme scheme, basic meaning, shallow imagery, and is intended to provoke and challenge young men into joining the war. Conversely, “Dulce et Decorum Est” is an anti-war poem with a relatively more complicated rhyme scheme, complex meaning, deep imagery, and is intended to discourage those who write such propaganda as “Who’s for the Game?”.

With reference to two poems, discuss which poem you consider the best protest against war. In this essay, the two poems “Dulce et Decorum Est” and “Anthem for Doomed Youth” will be compared. Both of these pores are written by Wilfred Owen, one of the Major poets during World War 1. The language and structure of the two poems will be compared, and how the poet makes war sound terrible to make the reader feel sympathy for the soldiers. In the poem “Anthem for Doomed Youth”, Own points out that there was a lack of care for the soldiers that were either dying or already dead.