DNA testing is a powerful tool used for identification. It is used by scientists to gather evidence at crime scenes, determine paternity tests and find out any predispositions to diseases. DNA can be a powerful tool used to help solve criminal cases, and determine whether a person is innocent or guilty (1. Easy DNA, 23rd February 2015). It is shown that DNA databases reduce crime rates, especially in categories where forensic evidence can be collected from the scene such as murder, rape, assault, and vehicle theft (6. H. Brevy Cannon, January 11 2013). DNA is the master molecule of life and controls the growth and development of every living thing (2. Katie Lachter, 1997). There are many sources for DNA testing. Some of these sources are …show more content…
The prosecution's case was based almost wholly on DNA evidence. One of the key important pieces of evidence was a bloody glove found at Simpson's house. This glove that was Simpson's size in a style he previously been seen wearing, and was a match for the one found at the crime scene (rephrase this sentence please - have a look at how I phrased it previously). It was a strong case against Simpson. If all of the above evidence had been accepted by the jury, it would have led them to the conviction of Simpson. Due to the poor handling of the DNA evidence by the prosecution and poor procedural errors made concerning the admissibility of the evidence, the defence experts were able to find gaps in what would have been a solid case against Simpson. Laboratory negligence is a big issue concerning DNA evidence, and the defence used that to its benefit to prove OJ Simpsons …show more content…
Scheck, Peter J. Neufield at eh Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University. The aim of this non for profit organisation was to acquit prisoners, who would be proven innocent through the use of DNA. Since 1992, more than 300 people in the United States have been proven innocent, and 18 of those were on death row. The innocence project uses ground breaking DNA technology to free innocent people, has provided irrefutable proof that wrongful convictions are not isolated or rare events but instead arise from systemic defects.
The innocence project works in Congress, and state legislatures, to pass legislation and administrative policies that will prevent wrongful convictions and make it easier for the inn ocent to receive justice. They work to make sure that all physical evidence in all criminal cases be properly maintained as long as the defendant is incarcerated, under supervision or in civil litigation. Laws and policies protecting evidence preservation give innocent inmates a last chance to prove their innocence(7. Barry C. Scheck, Peter J. Neufield at eh Benjamin N. Cardozo - the innocence project,
During the year of 2015, a case that the Innocence Project was working on at the time was the Joseph Buffey Case. Joseph Buffey was convicted in 2001 in West Virginia of rape and robbery. Mr. Buffey pled guilty to the crimes based on the advise of his counsel and witness misidentification which was the heart of this investigation. On May 11, 2015, Mr. Buffey was excluded by DNA and the real perpetrator was later found. Mr. Buffey served a total of 15 years in prison for a crime that he did not commit. DNA Exonerations makes up 334 total cases that the Innocence Project has worked on. The following numbers overlap with the 334 cases. 237 cases involved misidentification by witnesses, 154 were the result of improper forensics, 92 were due to
Despite the efforts of the courts and law enforcement agencies to improve the handling of eyewitness testimony, misidentifications continue to be a major contributing factor to false convictions. The Innocence Project is a national litigation and public policy organization that has been dedicated to exonerating wrongfully convicted people through DNA testing. Since their inception in 1992, they have helped overturn 311 wrongful convictions in the United States, as of the date of this paper. Of those 311 cases, they have determined that misidentification has contributed to approximately 73% of those wrongful convictions ("The Innocence Project"). That is an extremely high percentage, and something needs to be done about this.
Human DNA is very similar to one another, but only about 0.1% is different from the next person. That 0.1% can tell a person’s eye color, hair color, and other physical features. DNA analyst are able to take a drop of blood, the size of a dime, and duplicate the number DNA found in that drop. With the ability to duplicate DNA, analysts can have a back-up, in the event a human error were to occur. Analyst can tell you exactly where your ancestors came from and the percentage that is still inside your DNA. DNA is a very powerful tool that can identify a murder if the individual left any blood, saliva, skin tissue, hair or semen. The education needed to be able make use of the DNA consists of a great deal of science classes.
This Organisation is a non-profit Legal organisation dedicated to exonerating wrongfully convicted people through DNA testing and reforming the criminal justice system to prevent future injustices. The Innocence Project was established in a landmark study by the United States Department of Justice and the United States Senate in conjunction with the Benjamin N.Cardozo School of Law, which found that incorrect identification by eyewitnesses was a factor in over 70% of
The project has campaigned to expand rights of convicted and the right to undergo DNA evaluation. Some have wanted rights to utilize DNA testing because it was extremely avoid the innocence from serving time and reduce the number of convictions. They have created the organization to be sided with the suspect as they have no useful resources to proclaim their innocence and provide pro bono services and pays off all investigation and litigation costs of all
Due to the uniqueness of DNA it has become a powerful tool in criminal investigations
False confessions have been a leading factor in destroying the lives of many innocent people. Since the advances of technology, victims of false confessions have been exonerated from the charges previously placed on them while others are still fighting for innocence or died a criminal. One technological advance that has exonerated many individuals is DNA testing. According to Randy James, DNA testing was discovered in 1985 and was first used in court to convict Tommie Lee Andrews (Time, 2009). Today many Americans are convicted because of false confessions that have not yet been overturned with new evidence (Kassin, 2014). Although DNA testing has led to freedom for many innocent Americans, there are still many innocent people who are locked
This Organisation is a non-profit Legal organisation dedicated to exonerating wrongfully convicted people through DNA testing and reforming the criminal justice system to prevent future injustices. The Innocence Project was established in a landmark study by the United States Department of Justice and the United States Senate in conjunction with the Benjamin N.Cardozo School of Law, which found that incorrect identification by eyewitnesses was a
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) has been used to analyze and prove innocence or guilt of suspects of crimes with great accuracy. DNA is part of everyday life. It is the heredity material in humans and almost all other organisms. While being part of an investigation. DNA has helped to solve crimes. There is a couple ways that DNA left behind can be tested to solve a crime. Either if the suspect has been caught and or had his or her DNA tested, or if he or she has left behind any biological evidence. Which then needs to be tested to see if it matches the DNA found in the crime scene to his or hers DNA. The result to this comparison may help establish if the suspect committed the crime.
Every time an innocent person is exonerated based on DNA testing, law enforcement agencies look at what caused the wrongful convictions. There are many issues that contribute to putting guiltless lives behind bars including: eyewitness misidentification, false confessions, imperfect forensic science, and more (Gould and Leo 18). When a witness is taken into a police station to identify a suspect, it is easy for their memories to be blurred and their judgment influenced. This can lead the witness to identify a suspect who is actually innocent. Flawed forensic science practice also contributes to wrongful imprisonments. In the past, analysts have been inaccurate due to carelessness, testified in court presenting evidence that was not based
Since the late 1980s, there have been thousands of cases in which prime suspects have been wrongfully convicted, the most common causes being eyewitness misidentification, incriminating statements, and statements from informants. According to The Innocence Project, there have been almost four hundred post-conviction DNA exoneration cases in our country, and they are working to investigate even more wrongful conviction cases. This life changing program, along with their six attorneys, gather information about thousands of cases and determine whether or not DNA evidence can be reevaluated. Kenneth Ireland’s case was submitted for litigation after they found that the court relied heavily on false statements from witnesses. Researchers working
There are many noteworthy events that occur throughout the Actual Innocence book. The emergence of DNA and the Innocence Project where stories that were kind of hard to follow throughout the book. Throughout the book there were bits and pieces about each, when it might have been easier to follow if the authors just kept all this information together. After so many were exonerated, states started to put restrictions on when and how prisoners could appeal. According to Berger (2006), “Furthermore, in many states, stringent time limits on making motions for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence seemed to bar judicial relief even if a prisoner could somehow obtain an exculpatory DNA result” (p. 320) Even though there are many injustices that occur in the justice system on a daily basis, the book gave readers hope in the justice system again. The hope was from the Innocence Project. Two lawyers named Barry and Peter got together in New York City, their goal was to free innocent people in prison. They had many trials and tribulations, but they used DNA testing to free hundreds of innocent. This book even informed readers of what DNA testing was, and how it was created. The only downfall of getting them exonerated, is that DNA and the Innocence project could not help all of them get back on their feet. There were no solutions to this problem in the book either.
The Innocence Project is a non-profit organization that is used to free wrongly convicted people through the use of DNA testing and to reform the criminal justice system to prevent future injustice.
DNA evidence is extremely helpful in criminal trials not only because it can determine the guilt of a suspect, but also because it can keep innocent people from going to jail. The suspect must leave a sample of their DNA at the crime scene in order for testing to occur, but DNA can be found in the form of many things such as semen, blood, hair, saliva, or skin scrapings. According to Newsweek, "thousands of people have been convicted by DNA's nearly miraculous ability to search out suspects across space and time… hundreds of innocent people have also been freed, often after years behind bars, sometimes just short of the death chamber" (Adler ). Though some may think it is a waste of time to go
The Innocence Project was established in the wake of a landmark study by the United States Department of Justice and the United States Senate with help from the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law (Schneider, 2013). This study found that there were numerous reasons why people are wrongfully convicted including, but not limited to eye witness identification, perjured testimony, improper forensic science techniques, and government misconduct (Roberts & Weathered, 2009) The original Innocence Project was founded twenty two (22) years ago as a part of the Cardoza School of Law of Yeshiva University in New York City, New York (Davis, 2012). The Innocence Projects primary goal is to exonerate those whom have been convicted of a crime when there is DNA evidence available to be tested or re-tested (Mitchell, 2011). DNA testing has been possible in five (5) percent to ten (10) percent of cases since 1992 (Risinger, 2007). On the other side, other members of the Innocence Project help to exonerate those have been convicted of a crime where there is no DNA evidence to test. A goal of the Innocence Project is to conduct research on the reasons for wrongful convictions, how to fix the criminal justice system, as well as advocate for those who have been wrongfully convicted (Steiker & Steiker, 2005). The members of this organization strive to teach the world about the dangers of wrongful convictions. To date, this non-profit legal organization, has freed three hundred eighteen (318)