Why The Rich And The Petty Bourgeoisie Tolerate The State?

The anarchy of production can be explained as the competitive nature of capitalism, which in an effort to increase output levels drives the capitalist to increase productivity within their individual factories. In an attempt to come out on top they will flood markets with their products without careful consideration of the actual needs of society. Ironically, Engles states that “the anarchy of production is accentuated by the very opposite of anarchy: the organization of production in the individual factory” (Engles 298). The anarchy of production leads to a concentration in the organization of production within the factory, capitalist will constantly find ways to improve their machinery and increase the productivity of labour (Engles 299). But, those who have the advantages for the natural or artificial conditions of production will prevail, and the rest will succumb to the capitalist system and fall into the working class themselves (Engles 299). At the same time the improved technology of machinery within factories leads to labour power becoming less and less useful (Engles 300). As a result more wage workers are laid off creating what Engles calls the “Industrial reserve army” (299). The anarchy of production pushes the organization of production past its limits,

Capitalism had created the circumstances that maker worker’s lives so meaningless, joyless, and hopeless. Capitalism has turned workers into their job. It has transformed everyone from a person to a thing. Every worker is known by their job and is their job. Every worker adapts and loses their self-identity for a job.

Bertrand Russell once expressed that “advocates of capitalism are very apt to appeal to the sacred principles of liberty, which are embodied in one maxim: The fortunate must not be restrained in the exercise of tyranny over the unfortunate” (Russell). Even in a relatively capitalist society, there are always criticism regarding the capitalism and its disregard for “the unfortunate” and the tyranny the “fortunate” exert over. The foremost proponent of this antagonism would be Karl Marx, who claimed that capitalism is ultimately hurtling toward its downfall.

With the protracted reign of segregation of the proletariat by a system that benefits the bourgeoisie, this entire face of discrimination makes an economy rigged toward one goal, which is keeping the current owners of the means of the production of power. Aiding the bourgeoisie is the world adoption of an hyper-capitalistic economic model where many of the traditional socialistic programs are cut out to keep the proletariat out of power by limiting their capital. While saving the bourgeoisie their money and sometimes increasing it due to the privatization of usual state-operated institutions that are now destined to filling the coffers of the affluent in the society.

Throughout history, humans have been unfortunately known for exploiting fellow humans. Major instances of exploitation include slavery and, as German philosopher Karl Marx argued, capitalism. Marx, having observed the class conflict between the bourgeoisie (the capitalists) and the proletariat (the workers), said that in the capitalist system, the bourgeoisie take advantage of the proletariat for financial gains. With the introduction of modern industry, instead of helping the workers work less, machinery only worsened the conflict as capitalists utilized them for the wrong purposes that in turn suppressed the workers even more.

Capitalism is defined as a system that uses a labor for wage exchanged to benefit the ruling class. Day in and day out people work for minimal pay to support themselves and their family. In a world dedicated to helping the rich become richer, what is left for the working class? This system is purely based around the oppression of the working class, by keeping wealth from the poor, gentrifying communities, and using systems that imprison those of lower income. The system does not allow for the working class to make much or gain economically nor socially. The capitalist system is the downfall of the working class, for those who spend all their time working for wages, it seems that the benefits do not outweigh the faults in the system’s design.

According to the Marxist theory, the original state of man was a primitive communism without private property. Business owners prioritize the maximization of their own profits above everything else. To accomplish this, they compensate their employees with as little as possible, while claiming all of what their workers produce as their own profit. Eventually, the more successful businesses grow beyond the reach of the smaller, newer, and weaker ones, making the attainment of big business owners’ level of success unreachable. As a result, revolution would arise from the discontent population. Finally, this would result in a dictatorship where the state would own and control all industry. However, this set of ideals juxtaposes reality. As evident

Freedom is an image of tranquility and the primitive essence of living life to one’s accord. Freedom is waking up in the morning and knowing that you are the narrator of your own life, not some overruling figure where you generate a fabricated savoir-faire to impress them, or merely survive another day. Alternatively, history vividly shows us about times when people wake to loud lashes, mothers crying for their children, and young women being raped. that was the reality of slaves living in the United States. For some, it could be hard to comprehend the tragedies many poor souls had to endure on this very soil. We simply do not think about the repercussions that follow living with no freedom. The movie 12 Years a Slave is a spectacular depiction of waking up one day as a free man, and the next morning being a piece of property. Solomon Northup is one of the main characters in this film, who is wholly separated from his family and sold to a slave master. His 12-year journey teaches us about the precious gift of freedom, religious music, and nonetheless the supposition that the Lord is on the master’s side rather than the innocent slaves.

Under this system there are two classes of people, the property owner and the worker. In a political economy, the worker becomes material. They are part of the landscape, and the lowest form of material. Competition brings wealth to only a few, which is very much like the prior systems of a royal monopoly. We are still a two class system. The interest of the capitalist comes first, with ongoing competition. The system succeeds at greed and competition. Where does this leave the worker, he doesn’t feel a connection. The more the worker produces, the poorer he becomes, the

The individuals and groups of people such as the corporations, media and government, who control and regulate the most dominant mechanisms for creating and influencing ideas, are the main beneficiaries of capitalism. This means they are unwilling to acknowledge anything to do with inequality and injustice. Capitalists and therefore the State, recognize their own interests

Emerging, as Marx posits, “out of the economic structure of feudal society,” Capitalism quickly became a pervasive, relentless and seemingly inescapable structure. “The emancipation from serfdom and from the fetters of the guild” led, on one hand, to the unprecedented creation of various economic and social opportunities. Conversely, Marx also acknowledges that “these new freedmen became sellers of themselves only after they had been robbed of all their own means of production, and of all the guarantees of existence afforded by the old feudal system…Just as man is governed, in religion, by the products of his own brain, so, in capitalist production, he is governed by the products of his own hand…within the capitalist system all methods for raising the social productiveness of labor are brought about at the cost of the individual laborer; all means for the development of production transform themselves into means of domination over, and exploitation of, the producers; they mutilate the laborer into a fragment of a man, degrade him to the level of an appendage of a machine…they transform his lifetime into working-time, and drag his wife and child beneath the wheels of the Juggernaut of capital… Accumulation of wealth is at one pole, therefore, at the same time accumulation of misery, agony of toil slaver, ignorance, brutality, mental degradation, at the opposite pole, i.e., one the side of the class that produces its own product in the form of capital.” Throughout the first

People are slaves to the machine and the bourgeoisie because they need to work more hours daily for lower wages because the jobs become more simplistic and automated. A modern example of this is people on an assembly in Detroit, where cars are made. Things are now to the point were you can learn a job in a week when in the past it would have taken years to learn the same job. Marx believes that to sustain market growth capitalism becomes more automated for the giants of industry. Due to this “machinery obliterates all distinctions of labour and nearly everywhere reduces wages” (Cohen and Fermon, 454). In capitalism people are enslaved for lower wages, as the work becomes less appealing. Marx believed, “As the repulsiveness of the work increases, the wage decreases” (Cohen and Fermon, 453).

As the world becomes more advanced, it transforms into an increasingly competitive state. The idea of success starts getting measured by how much money people make, as opposed to emotional happiness. We end up dedicating our schedule around job hours; we tend to work more, and get paid less; we search for jobs that eventually drain our energy. Everyone, meet capitalism (*private ownership of business as a means of production). A Greek philosopher named Karl Marx once suggested that, for these reasons and more, capitalism is evil. Well, I agree. In this essay, I will closely examine Marx’s view on capitalism. I will then justify his proposition by applying it to my own experiences.

This highlights how the dominant culture of society is created by those in power because they are the ones creating the institutions. These ideals get passed down because those who support this create structures in order to maintain this power. An example is the way work and labour is broken up in the economic systems. While Marx advocates workers to construct a social relationship where workers are the voice of production and are not estranged from the fruits of their labor because humans gain self-satisfaction from working and completing projects, thereby stripping them of these interactions. This calls for the alienation of the worker as a means to maintain the superstructure of power dynamics of economic exploitation. Marx claims social consciousness and revolutions will derive from this concept, thus leading to full blown communism.

Throughout history, society has been organized by and for the ruling classes at the expense of those who work and produce. And throughout history, the ruling class has been usurped and replaced by the next in line to rule society. And every time a new class comes into power they proclaim their state to be the only state in which humans can function, from the Chinese emperors getting their mandate from heaven, to the captains of industry utilizing social darwinism. Yet despite what these ruling classes say about their own permanence, history shows a constant trend towards freedom, towards the emancipation of all people from class society. Currently we live under a bourgeois dictatorship, or a society in which the capitalist class are the dominant class. This is what creates capitalism, a system in which the means of production, exchange, and distribution are privately owned in a for-profit market economy. Socialism, however, seeks to replace the bourgeois dictatorship with a dictatorship of the proletariat, a society ruled by and for the working class as a whole. In this society the means of production, exchange, and distribution would be held in common in a democratically planned economy. If one has a firm grasp of history it is clear that transitioning to socialism, followed by communism, is the natural progression of human society. Socialism, therefore, seems to be an inevitability. In light of this it is important to understand socialism economically, politically, and