preview

William Served As A Justice Of The Supreme Court

Better Essays
Rehnquist was appointed by President Nixon and took his oath into office as associate justice on January 7, 1972. Rehnquist has served as the court conservative ideologue. William served as a chief justice of the Supreme Court from September 26, 1986 to September 3, 2005. During his time that he served as a Supreme Court judge, he wrote majority of opinions on the fourth amendment with included searches, seizures and traffic stops. Rehnquist argued about conservative views in a number of cases held by the Supreme Court. “His writings were mostly for the majority or dissenting opinions. Rehnquist had recognized his conservative viewpoints through the deference to the government over individual rights, respect for legislative actions in…show more content…
The images that the drone recorded showed a massive arsenal of firearms and illegal explosives that were visible through the skylights. During the search, deputies arrested a man by the name of Mr. Sweeney, who was living at the house. The deputies conducted a detailed search and they examined the address book contained in Mr. Sweeney’s cell phone. They saw multiple numbers of possible white supremacist, along with pictures and videos of crimes committed by Mr. Sweeney, which included the bombing of an elementary school. Detectives questioned Mr. Sweeney for approximately 36 hours without breaks and without legal counsel. During the interrogation Mr. Sweeney provided information about previous and future planned attacks. Based on the evidence found at the residence and the confessions of Mr. Sweeney, he was subsequently charged with a number of crimes including terrorist attacks. The jury found Mr. Sweeney guilty and convicted him of conspiracy, domestic terrorism, and murder. Rehnquist determined that the only way to not violate the fourth Amendment is to adopt a rule that precludes the prosecution from using any evidence that would have been collected in an unreasonable matter without probable cause. For example, Mapp v. Ohio; three police officers sought a bombing suspect and they found evidence that a bomb had been in her home. The officers were trying to gain entry into the home without a search warrant and she refused
Get Access