Bill W.

Aris Kagramanov 2/15/16 Mrs Jones Final Draft "Individuals can judge me for what I've done. What's more, I think when some person's out in people in general eye, that is their main thing. So I'm completely alright with who I am, what I remain for, and what I've generally stood for.(Hillary1)" The hopeful I am expounding on is Mrs. Hillary Clinton. I like this hopeful since Hillary has officially put in eight years in the White House as First Lady Yes, I for one do feel that Ms. Hillary Clinton

“Women's rights are humans rights” Analysis Hillary Rodham Clinton gave the speech fondly known as, “women's rights are humans rights” more correctly known as, “Remarks to the U.N 4 th world conference on women's plenary session”. The speech was delivered on September 5 1995 in Beijing China. The historical value of the speech is highly important as for millennia women have been oppressed and put in distress. The purpose of the speech is to clarify and spread the harm that the issue can inflict

had 44 different presidents and the 45th president is going to be decided in less than 2 months. The 2 main party candidates this year are Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton is the Democratic Nominee and the wife of former president Bill Clinton, and Donald Trump is the Republican Nominee and have already been in the spotlight for many years as he is a famous businessman. As of September 27th Trump is ahead in the polls not by a massive percentages though, and that’s probably because

Power and corruption seem to be words that most people would say go hand in hand. Why is this, though? Does power lead to corruption or is there some other correlation? Maybe it is powerlessness that actually brings corruption. Everyone to some extent is powerless; even the highest leaders are not absolute. Power is at all times up to question, as anyone could lose it with just a few events. Also the only way to be absolute in power would be complete world domination, which no one person has ever

find whole "political experience" question is often loaded.  It is a useful and facile way to "settle" a political argument.  When conversing with people who one disagrees with politically, declaring all politicians inherently bad is an easy way to gain "consensus" and be at liberty to criticize any candidate without appearing to disparage the beliefs of the other person.  It is therefore used so often it's become some form of "conventional wisdom".  But it's too simplistic.   I think the key issue

A team is a group of people who work together, apply each other's strengths and work on each person's weaknesses. Such unity and hard work can lead to victory, without it a group will not prosper and break under pressure. The movie Miracle and the book Bleachers are both alike but are more different when analyzed in chemistry, coaching technique, and success. Miracle is based on the true story of the newly formed United States Men’s Hockey team and their journey as they prepare to compete in the

Downgrading. That is this election in a nutshell. I have not felt more annoyed with politics and media outlets than ever before, since Donald Trump announced his candidacy on June 16, 2015 ,with those empty four words "Make America Great Again" , we learned that Trump is nothing, but a whining child that erupts on any ounce of criticism from either side. Why did he gain the support of voters with such minuet substance, like building a wall or banning all Muslims? I believe voters fell into the same

seemed like a normal failed investment. However, it would later be discovered that it was much deeper than that. It later came to surface that the project was funded by a fraudulent loan of $300,000. David Hale, the man who issued the loan, claimed that Bill Clinton pressured him to do so. Hillary Clinton took care of the legal matters for the entire Whitewater project, which made things more mysterious as billing records for the project went missing for two years and suddenly reappeared. Just days before

interest groups in order to gain support from lobbyist. Billy Tauzin and Karen Ignagani were two people who played vital roles in the passing of the Affordable Care Act. Tauzin was used to get PhRMA on board, a major player in the failure of Clinton’s bill, and Ignagni was able to get AHIP on board as well, two major victories towards Obama’s attempt for healthcare reform (p.257-264). Reversely, Obama was not able to have success with the gun lobby during his attempt, as the NRA would shoot down any

Republican groups and campaigned for Barry Goldwater in 1964. She attended Wellesley College, where she was active in student politics and elected senior class president. After graduating in 1969, she went on to attend Yale Law School, where she met Bill Clinton. After graduating with honors from Yale in 1973, she enrolled at the Yale Child Study Center. This is where she took courses for children and medicine and completed one post-graduate year