Physicalism

Sort By:
Page 8 of 22 - About 219 essays
  • Good Essays

    “What is it like to be a bat?” Thomas Nagel argues that physicalism cannot possibly account for consciousness and quaila, or qualitative states. The objection in his article is target the flaws of both functionalism and physicalism with emphasis on the importance of consciousness and its subjective nature. In this paper, I will argue on Nagel’s argument but also focus on how a functionalist can respond to his objection. To explain what physicalism or functionalism stand for in philosophy, I will introduce

    • 1343 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mind Body Problem

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    well known explanations to the mind and body problem. They are known as dualism and physicalism also known as materialism. Rene Descartes a french philosopher and a scientist proposed and in depth explanation to the mind-problem, his

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Elizabeth Clines PHIL 290-16 April 15, 2015 Paper 2: Graham on the Mind-Body Problem The Mind/Body Problem: Dualism, Physicalism, or Both? In “The Disordered Mind”, author George Graham claims the mind/body problem to be one of the most famous problems in the history of philosophy. The mind/body problem is “the question of the place of consciousness and intentionality or of the mind in the physical world” (Graham 76). In other words, are the brain and mind two separate entities, or are they one

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Good Essays

    and body. Nagel argues against this, and believes that every human and conscious being has its own special subjective character of experience. There is something that it is like for the being to be itself, which cannot be explained through just physicalism, or objective reductionist means. It’s foolish for consciousness to be explained from a reductionist, or physicalist viewpoint. Nagel disputes that every subjective experience is connected with a “single point of view” making it impossible to consider

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Decent Essays

    2rd, 2016 Philosophy 101: Introduction to Philosophy Professor Bayne Dualism Best Explains the Nature of Consciousness The three theories we have discussed so far are the dualism theory of Plato and Descartes, the Aristotelian theory, and the Physicalism (identity) theory of Place and Strong. The identity of consciousness means that if you have the same consciousness, you are the same person, and if not conscience, you are not the same person. The thing that remains constant throughout all states

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Through the reaction of coming in contact with something not made of matter, it can be explained through physical processes as to what, why and how it caused this certain reaction to occur. Through The Qualia Problem, Jackson presents a claim that physicalism is false because of its inability to explain a conscious experience using the physical components that process within the body without the use of Qualia. I will argue that this claim presents an issue with the view that things that do not have matter

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    without the other. But there is no right or wrong answer for either. Physicalism and dualism, I believe both of these give a good case about the mind-body but there really isn’t a real good answer, but between the two I find dualism to be more plausible with the mind-body problem. Dualism states that the mind and the body are two completely different things, independent from one another. (Nerruan Webster) In Wikipedia, physicalism states that the body and mind is the same thing. I find it a little

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    the main threats to Physicalism. Physicalism says that everything that is or could ever exist is ultimately physical in nature. The Knowledge Argument claims that there are truths about consciousness that cannot be deduced from the complete physical truth. Lewis’ response on the other hand, disagrees with the Knowledge Argument. In this paper I will address the Knowledge Argument and Lewis’ response to it. The following is a thought experiment by Jackson to undermine Physicalism. “Mary is a brilliant

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Better Essays

    The knowledge argument is an argument against physicalism that was first formulated by Frank Jackson in 1982. While Jackson no longer endorses it, it is still regarded as one of the most important arguments in the philosophy of mind. Physicalism is the metaphysical thesis that, basically, everything in this world-including cars, humans, animals, research papers, even our sensations-are ultimately physical. The knowledge argument attempts to refute this thesis by appealing to the following made-up

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    attempting to explain things like beliefs, consciousness, emotions, etc., in organisms. Physicalism, dualism, and functionalism all have their unique explanation for the mind-body problem’s implication of Phineas Gage’s accident. Physicalism is a philosophical theory that attempts to solve the mind-body problem with its explanation of the results of the interactions between our brains and our bodies. Physicalism explains that everything in the universe is made up of

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays